User talk:Jyothish.r

Speedy deletion nomination of Jobveno


A tag has been placed on Jobveno, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pure RED &#124; talk to me  &#124; 14:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alex ShihTalk 15:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 14:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

. Alex ShihTalk 15:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I must point out that, though your account might have been created eight years ago, you have only made four undeleted edits in total (including this unblock request), only one of which was to article space. In addition, you have made seven edits to two articles that were later deleted, one of which you created yourself which was speedy deleted as being promotional (for which you were blocked). Saying you have not posted any promotional content before seems a little disingenuous when you have actually posted as close to no surviving article content as you can get without it being actually none. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

unblock discussion
Sorry, I'm not convinced that unblocking you would be wise. Some of your edits were not overly constructive such as edits to an article deleted at Articles for deletion/Republic of karnataka, which looks to me like some sort of soapbox. That looks like the most prominent of your edits of old. You did add info cited to a subject's website, but that possible passed muster. Then of course there's Jobveno. What sort of constructive edits will you make? How will you recognize promotional editing so as not to produce more spam? Please state in your own words the meaning and intent of WP:RS and WP:IS. How do these relate to WP:N?--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)