User talk:J~enwiki/Archives/2007/February

4-H and WP:SCOUT
No it's not final. What came about was that someone had added even communist youth orgs the that cat and we decided to go in and purge it. Since the 4-H article didn't even mention Scouting, it was one I purged. If you could add some lines to the 4-H article about how/why it's could be considered a Scouting org, I'll add it back in. Showing 4-H uses the Scout method and/or is tied to Baden-Powell or BSA would be even better. Lv answer on my talk page.Rlevse 17:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Yamla
I responded. Check it out, and see if I formatted it correctly --71Demon 00:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for rearranging Requests for comment/Yamla. --Yamla 03:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

71Demon
Just to clear something up regarding 71Demon. He was told by multiple admins, both here and on unblock-en-l, that his characterising his block as a "spite block" was a personal attack and would not be tolerated. Note that it is not just my block that he is characterising as such. He was specifically told by another admin, "Please, never do that again. Ever." It is because he chose to continue the same personal attacks he was specifically warned about that resulted in my warning to him. Provided he refrains from any further personal attacks, I welcome his contributions to the Wikipedia generally and to the RfC specifically. --Yamla 23:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You said: "I recognize your concern regarding the two edits (one, two) 71Demon made, which seem to be the most immediate reasons for your warning. I believe that, in effect, the warning only served to potentially provoke the user and further escalate the situation.  Please consider not biting and not feeding.  Given the user's animosity relating to your conduct specifically, please also consider refraining from further engaing the user directly, and, instead, please consider asking other administrators to intervene should you believe further administrative action regarding the user is necessary."


 * Will do, with the exception of commenting on it on my RfC if he does the same thing again, and blanking attacks from my user talk page. If you believe this to be half-hearted or otherwise insufficient, please let me know and we'll discuss further.  --Yamla 00:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Just to be clear, my comment on the RfC would only be if he did the same thing on the RfC page itself. --Yamla 00:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Betty Ireland
Re-assess as neccesary and as often as needed. Those aren't set in stone, but moreso a part of an ongoing conversation about imrpoving WV-related articles. Thanks for taking an interest.

BTW, the guidelines were just copied and pasted from another Wikiproject a day ago, so they are still subject to change.  young  american (ahoy hoy) 17:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, don't worry about membership and ranking and whatnot. Assessments are welcome from all. No egos here.  young  american  (ahoy hoy) 17:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)