User talk:Körtilldå

Sweden
You asked why so much content had been deleted from Sweden, and have now reintroduced much of it. I'd like to introduce you to Summary style. The Sweden article is 127 KB, which is quite a lot for the average reader to read through. For articles on very general subjects, such as Sweden, only a short overview of a subject is supposed to be in the main article and more detailed info be moved into subarticles.

I hope I can get your co-operation in helping rewriting Sweden in summary style. The article is about twice as long as it should be. henrik • talk  13:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I would definitly help with that, is that new article supposed to be rewritten on one page separated from the Sweden page and then moved? If thats possible i think that would be the best way to do it. If you want a short text, why allow the adding of that bronze age neolithic period and all that shit when you allready had a good summary text of the Swedish prehistory. Actually i don't see why you would need to rewrite the whole article, why not just remove the unnecessary stuff instead, i could help you with that.


 * Great! Ah, no, I'm not suggesting that a new article be written. As you say, "removing the unnecessary stuff" is what I'm suggesting. The early history stuff is also problematic and a bit too detailed, I'm hoping it can be reshaped into a shorter text too.  henrik  • talk  14:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll remove some shit and then i'll motivate why here.


 * But please don't delete entire sections wholesale. What we need to do is summarizing them. henrik  • talk  14:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Allright, but some parts seem kinda unnecessary to me, and equivalences are not found in other articles about other countries either. Why not delete some full sections when there are like 350 of them?

But if thats what you want, ill do my work later on.


 * It's explained in Summary style. The main article should be a brief summary, but should still contain the most important highlights. henrik  • talk  14:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

why is the literature part gone though?

"Show Preview" button
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. &mdash; alex.muller (talk • edits) 15:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)