User talk:K-colwell

I don't know what the matter seems to be k-colwell, but I think we both know that the information I have contributed to the website is very true and accurate. What exactly seems to be your issue here? The fact that you continue to feel the need to revert my entry proves to me that you are the one in the wrong. I honestly do not know what is not true about the printing entry. Everything I have in there is true and correct!!! A $30 limit has been set beginning this year, and students are thereby faced with a tough choice. Everything beyond that costs four cents per page. So, I would appreciate it if you simply face up to the fact that this is true and deserves to be made known on the website. Thank you.

Is it also true?
You have also posted things about the College of Law that are absolutely untrue, that our President is a Medical Doctor, and many other posts that are rather childish.


 * Well, all I can say is that this is simply the nature of an Internet-based encyclopedia. Anyone who takes such a reference so seriously needs to reassess his basis of education.  Along those same lines, I was not very impressed with your grammar in your response.  I seriously think that you need to get a grip on the facts.  Then again, I guess that is what spending any length of time at Ohio Northern will do to a person.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rarefly45 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

Sorry about my grammar...
Very sorry about my grammar... it has been a long day.

Printing Costs
Why in the heck did you note that verification for the source was needed, and then you go ahead and delete what is otherwise an extremely worthy entry?!?!? You cease to amaze me... Do you think this will have an adverse impact on potential students considering attendance at ONU or something? If that is the case, then I strongly suggest that you get to the root of the problem and eliminate the crazy printing policy to begin with. Not only that, but I doubt a simple Wiki entry would make much of a difference with respect to how ONU is perceived.

Actually I didn't delete the entry....
I was just following the recommendation on this page Template:Fact that states that information that is poorly sourced may be moved to the talk page. I actually have no idea if what you have stated is true or not but it does sound like information that is not relevant to the "Technology Growth" section. In addition your entry sounds rather like someone complaining about a fee increase instead of a "neutral point of view."

A tag has been placed on Victor L. Streib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 14:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)