User talk:K.O.K Kev/2010/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nexus (professional wrestling), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The information you're referring to about Sheffield does not explicitly state that Sheffield is out of the group. --☆ Antoshi ☆ T 03:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Your source is not reliable enough. Like I've said before, until WWE itself gives actual information that he is NOT in the group, he is NOT to be removed from the list of current members. --☆ Antoshi ☆ T 04:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Nexus (professional wrestling). Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nexus (professional wrestling). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HTC Sabor


The article HTC Sabor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Completed unreferenced, speculative rumors about a product. Fails WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Re your message: The sources do not need to be from Google or HTC, but they do need to be from a reliable source. Generally, rumors about future products are not from reliable sources. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Re your message: No, that does not appear to be a reliable source nor does the original source of that story. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  So Why  10:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  So Why  10:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg
I have tagged File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days.  So Why  13:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I noticed you re-added it before and I re-removed it. Please note that non-free images must follow our non-free content criteria and this image fails WP:NFCC, since it's not needed in order for the reader to understand the article. It would be purely decorative, which is not allowed. So please do not re-add it to the article. Regards  So Why  13:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Again, please read the policy I linked above. File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg does not belong in List of HTC phones because non-free images should not be used where they are not necessary and it's certainly not necessary on that list, where it's too small to be of any use. Even if one argued to include a non-free picture in that list, this specific image is still not the right choice, since it's clearly an inferior choice to the current image in the phone's article which does show the back and does not show an unnecessary promotional caption. Regards  So Why  08:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mytouch4gggg.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  So Why  08:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serebii (website)


A tag has been placed on Serebii (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I don't want to appear as if I'm stalking you but I had to delete this page for copyright-related reasons. You copied the text from this wiki as far as I can see. This wiki does only grant content to be used and modified for non-commercial uses. Unfortunately, content added to Wikipedia must be available for everyone to use and adapt with attribution, so adding that content to Wikipedia constituted a copyright violation and in the interest of the project, it had to be removed as soon as possible. In the future, if you want to incorporate content from other pages, please make sure that they use the same license as Wikipedia does. Also, whenever you do incorporate content from a source with such a license, you have to attribute the source in your edit summary or in the article's footer, otherwise it will still be a copyright violation. Regards  So Why  09:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Serebii.PNG
I have tagged File:Serebii.PNG as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

You cannot put fair use images on your user page. And also there is no "Project Wikiranger".— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 03:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Victini poster
Please find a version of the poster that does not have a watermark from a fansite on it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 01:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The Poster has the watermark removed, any other ProblemsK.O.K Kev (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, it's clear you just used MS Paint to get rid of the watermark. Please try to find the original image instead.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 03:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There are several versions. The original is too small(50px), the second from a japanese doll has a plush, and the last two you've seen. I'll look but so far this is the best there is
 * Just try to find the original. Filb.de found it, so you can too.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 03:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Look, this poster is Great. With no disrespect but I don't see you adding upgrades or better versions. BTW Filb.de has almost 20 ppl if not alot more who dedicate their life to Pokemon. I'm adding the poster back. Please don't Start an Edit War.I;m just trying to improve this article.
 * We're not using it until someone can find the original image. I don't have to add a better image. The articles doesn't need to have a better image. The textual logo is fine.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And stop commenting on my user talk. That is why I am talking to you here. And you are not allowed to have any of the images you put on your user page on your user page.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!! What the hell is wrong with my image? First there's a watermark, then when the water mark is removed, there's still an issue. Your not helping the image at all ,just giving it a bad history. I haven't seen you do any better. According to Wikipedia, you'r ethe one starting a war. The image is 350px, it shows the purpose an dtwo main character Pokemon. BTW Stop deleting this and leave my userpage alone.
 * You cannot use any images that have a copyright on them on your user page. It is explicitly written in policy (see WP:Non-free content policy). You cannot have the images from Serebii on your page.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright But What's Wrong with The Poster?!
 * It's not the original image. It had the Filb.de watermark on it and now you just used MS Paint to cover it. Find the original image, then upload it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I talked to some people and the original was removed but just for YOU an alternative WITHOUT the watermark(http://blog.pokemon-movie.jp/2009/)! Is it better or can this end until The PKMN company release more images, THEN i'll reupload. The info's barely from today. WAITK.O.K Kev (talk) 05:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. — Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 05:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Serebii
Serebii is not a reliable source and should not be linked to, unless an article about the subject actually is made and is kept on the English Wikipedia. Do not say "Serebii says..." anywhere on Wikipedia again.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 23:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there K.O.K Kev, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:K.O.K Kev. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Htc-glacier-mytouch-4g.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KangPodkolPoD.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KangPodkolPoD.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use images
Stop putting fair use images on your userpage. I am not here to translate the damn Pokemon Global Link webpage for you. If you can't navigate it, don't go to it. Leave me alone. Don't put fair use images on your userpage and if you continue to upload screencaps of webpages just to ask people what they are you will be blocked.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 00:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KangPodkolPoD.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:KangPodkolPoD.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 11:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Let me be as clear as I possibly can. If the fair-use image makes another appearance on your userpage, I will block you from editing. This use of copyrighted material is not acceptable per the WP:NFCC. 11:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Images
Stop uploading images to Wikipedia. You are not using them properly. If you want to show us that an image exists, link to the original image rather than uploading it to Wikipedia to show us on Wikipedia. If you continue to violate our image policies, you may be blocked.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 19:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

If you cannot abide by our rules, you will be kicked out. Is that too hard to understand? You do not upload copyrighted images to Wikipedia just to say that they exist and put them on a talk page.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
Your edits to Ryulong's talk page are unacceptable. I've blocked you for twelve hours to cease disruption and so you can examine your edits. Please see WP:CIVIL, WP:BLOCK, and WP:DE in the meantime. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 20:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Courcelles 22:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Checking up
Ever since that whole spat in the Nexus article I decided to come and see what's been new. It seems you've gone on to try things that are obviously quite new to you as far as Wikipedia is concerned. And while all editors are encouraged to remain bold in editing and creating articles, it seems you're doing things without actually reading the rules.

You need to understand that Wikipedia has rules and that these rules are taken very seriously. This is not some random Pokemon web forum or Facebook, Wikipedia has strict rules that people have been linking you to time and time again when you make a mistake. Making a mistake isn't a problem, but blatantly ignoring the rules is.

I see that you're creating articles without sources or notability. You're taking information from other Wiki's. You're not properly tagging fair-use rationale to your uploaded images and you're blatantly uploading non-free images in the hopes that you'll just be able to get away with it. Wikipedia is not a website for you to simply upload images as you see fit. These images aren't to be used for your own benefit, they're supposed to be used to progress the encyclopedia as a whole and bring visual aid to articles.

In the case of Ryulong, unless someone is harassing you on your talk page they have every right to post on it, especially if they're there to inform you that you did not follow the rules. That does not give you the right to go to their talk page, call them 'Overconfident' and swear at them. ALL editors have the right to revert articles, nominate articles to be deleted and inform other editors of their mistakes so that they can learn from them. You do not have to be an Administrator to warn someone that they will be blocked from editing if they continue to break the rules. (See: Template messages/User talk namespace)

I get the sense that you're a younger person because of the way you're editing and reacting to situations. While Wikipedia has plenty of young editors, they're all required to follow the rules, regardless of age. You need to settle down, take the time to understand the rules and what you may have done wrong and learn from your mistakes so that you can continue to be an editor on Wikipedia. Otherwise, you won't be doing much. --☆ Antoshi ☆ T 13:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Poster & "Tao" trio
I believe it is better to wait for a better version of the US poster to come out, rather than to use a tiny tiny version from the official website. It does not matter that Wikipedia is using the Japanese poster at this stage, because it is still a Japanese movie.

There is nothing to state anywhere that Kyurem represents the "Wuji". Yes, Reshiram and Zekrom are "Yin" and "Yang", but Kyurem is only "Boundary". And there is nothing that links the yin and yang to fire and thunder. It is all WP:OR and not allowed. Also, I entirely rewrote the Reshiram and Zekrom sections to look better, because anything real world about them does nto need to be mentioned before they are physically described.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 01:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I have to agree on both points. Wikipedia is not a news site, and should use whatever is best for displaying information to the reader. The japanese version is bigger and clearer, and thus better illustrates the movie to the reader. Also, yes, the trio names are original research. Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop uploading new versions of the poster. You cannot upload the DVD box art and claim it is the film poster. A new image has to be used, and we have to wait for the article to change, anyway. The Japanese movie poster is fine. Just because older pages got automatically updated with the English release info does not mean this one has to. Remember that our rules are different from other websites' rules. What's good on fansites is not good on Wikipedia.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I said above, Wikipedia does not need to update automaticly for these things. The image used now is fine. Wait until a better quality english poster is given. No need to rush. Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Sign your posts
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. — Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

File:LOGOPUCCA.gif
Ugh. What did Courcelles and I tell you about images? First, this is way too big. The first rule about copyrighted images is that they should be as small as possible, but large enough that they can be adequately used. And on top of all of this, you don't say where the image comes from and you don't know how to properly format them on Wikipedia.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:53, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Season 4?
If there will be a season for, do you mind creating that page for me. That way, I might understand all of this better. So can you please start a season 4 page for those of us who are confused. Thanks for the notification. Please tell me what you think as soon as possible. Thanks for your help! 68.6.148.3 (talk) 02:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Response: Well, yes. So, what is the answer? Please respond to this soon.
 * Okay, well here is another question: do you think that the episode, Clash at Crash Town Part 2, was only a mid-season finale. Like a break in the middle of a season. Please tell me what think soon. Thank you! 68.6.148.3 (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the answers. But I got one more question: So basically Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's: Road to Destiny has been "cut in half" for a certain amount of time, simply because of the issues that you listed (and probably more) on my talk page? So that means that Road to Destiny isn't really finished yet? Please respond to this soon. Thanks for all of the answers! 68.6.148.3 (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Response: Thanks for the help! Now I really understand all of this. I really can't believe that they are holding up Road to Destiny until that much later, but oh well, I guess that I will have to wait until then. Again, thanks for the help! 68.6.148.3 (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Zoroark movie
Do not replace the reliably sourced plot section with your section based on watching a fansub of the Japanese movie. It is not my job to sit through 11 copyright violation YouTube videos and write up a plot summary. You shouldn't be using them either. Wait for the movie to come out this year on Cartoon Network.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 03:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Your plot section is not written very well. You use the past tense to refer to events in the film. You only focus on the events of the film concerning Zoroark and Celebi. You refer to something in a post credits sequence which is not important. And on top of all of that, you are not allowed to link to illegal copies of a movie on YouTube. Remove your content now, because you have now violated WP:3RR. The only job I have is to make sure that all articles are properly written and properly and reliably sourced.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 04:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokémon: Zoroark: Master of Illusions and your comments on User talk:Ryulong
Hi K.O.K Kev, I noticed your edits to Pokémon: Zoroark: Master of Illusions, as well as your comments on Ryulong's talk page. With regards to the Pokemon article, I wanted to make you aware that we require reliable sourcing for content in Wikipedia articles. This is to allow readers to see where we got our information from, and allow them to see the original source if needed. For several reasons YouTube is not considered a reliable source. For one, there is no way to absolutely verify the content posted to YouTube is genuine - anyone could be uploading content. Secondly, and less of an issue, is that it is likely that the content on YouTube in this case is a copyright violation, and is unlikely to remain on their site. Ryulong appears to have mentioned a few of these problems above. I noticed you responded to him, and it is good that you are engaging other editors with whom you disagree. However, it is important to assume he is acting in good faith and refrain from attacking him personally. Comment on content, not on the contributor, so that your discussion can improve the article instead of merely being bickering. Attacking other editors tends not to do this, and will result in your account being blocked. Thanks, Prodego  talk  04:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)