User talk:K.O Defender


 * }

First of all, "Cilan" is still not confirmed. Second, do not remove "Dent" just because "Cilan" exists. "Dent" should remain on Wikipedia as a name. We are not like all of the other websites that completely ignore that the Japanese names exist in some format.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 19:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Victini and the White Hero: Reshiram


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Victini and the White Hero: Reshiram, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

'''Never make articles about fake things on Wikipedia. There is never going to be a film "Victini and the White Hero Reshiram" and your creation of the article by copy-pasting the content from Victini and the Black Hero: Zekrom is vandalism.'''— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay, CoroCoro leaks are not reliable sources. We have to wait like everyone else to get the information because this information could be completely fabricated and there is not going to be a Reshiram film. Also, you have the entirely wrong title. Just wait a week or so for CoroCoro's next issue to come out and then we can mention the film but it does not get its own article because there are not enough reliable sources to support its notability.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)