User talk:K177isnext

revisions to K class article
Hi there,

I've just reverted your edit with details on N class preservation in the K class article for the second time. Preservation details for the N class are already detailed in the separate article for that locomotive, and a link for that article is already there.

I'd also note that the amount of detail on K 174's restoration is probably going overboard given the size of the article and level of detail in the other sections. That's not to say the information is not of interest or importance, but I'd really recommend creating a separate article to cover this locomotive.

Zzrbiker (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)