User talk:K18s/Archive 2

August 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Pellucid marginal degeneration, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. you were too fast and I was going to edit it... k18s (talk) 23:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

EyeWiki
Are you associated with them? And if so do you think they would be willing to consider moving to an open license? Currently they are not  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 06:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * James, I am not. I contacted them a while ago for permission to use their images, but I did not received any response. I will write again. their email is eyewiki@aao.org if you would like to try too. k18s (talk) 14:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Corneal collagen cross-linking. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Diannaa I do not think this is in the public domain. It is produced by Avedro, Inc. and approved by the US government. It is not written by the US government directly. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I was going by the website's copyright page. I see what you mean though. Does it have to be removed as copyvio? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * That website says "Government information at NLM Web sites is in the public domain." with the key being government". I think that stuff counts as non government information. I have paraphrased some of it so I think we are okay. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 14:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks James and Diannaa. I shouldn't have used that without any change. k18s (talk) 04:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rare Disease Day Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rare Disease Day Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — kashmiri  TALK  12:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of EyeWiki for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EyeWiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EyeWiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MrOllie (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)