User talk:K272479

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 21:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
modilo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 01:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Proposed deletion of Modilo


The article Modilo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * References do not show notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NexCarnifex (talk) 02:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Modilo for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Modilo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Modilo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Discussion of possible deletion of Modilo
That discussion is at Articles_for_deletion/Modilo], I took the liberty of moving your comment their. The policy for determining the notability of companies is at WP:CORP, you might take a look at that. --Nuujinn (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Modilo
Well, the first thing you can try is to ask an admin to "userfy" the artcle, that is, move it to your article space. They may or may not do this, but it is an option. Then you need to edit the article itself, and add references that can establish notability. An ideal source would be an in depth review of the subject by a newspaper or magazine--it is important that the source be independent of the subject. Non-english sources are fine, but you may be asked to provide a translation. When you think you have the article in good shape, I would suggest that you request feedback on it, a good place to do this is RFF. Drop me a note anytime if you need some help, best of luck. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the suggestions ... but exactly HOW do we "ask an admin to userfy the article" ? Should we mail someone or do it through some "forum" ?

Having spent some time reasearching Wikipedia absout "context aware", "location enabled" and "ambient software", and checking those references ... as well as a number of references (many of which are NOT valid :- from company specific wiki-pages, it's pretty obvious to us that modilo and the references we can provide, are as "notable" as any of these. In addition to that it would be very ODD if an entry about a company and service which is very cutting-edge (world wide and definately in europe) would be rejected !

--kss (talk) 13:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)