User talk:K480b

K480b (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Questioning why "Religious monism" is included, much less dominant. Indeed, given a scientific consensus on universal laws of nature (gravity, genetics, etc.), religious belief seems to require some sort of dualism, and "Religious monism" to be an oxymoron. Even if religion (or spirituality) and natural laws are not necessarily incompatible, most religions (especially the dominant Abrahamic ones) regard such dichotomies as good-evil, heaven-earth, body-mind, creator-creation as real. Such dichotomies are incompatible with monism, as described elsewhere in the article. Since I am only a newly "minted" editor, I am reluctant to remove this section (and its references) on my own. Yet "Religious monism" appears completely out of place.

Welcome!
Hello, K480b, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! William M. Connolley (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Monism
Hi. Re Monism: I reverted your changes. The correct place for your questions is the article talk page, Talk:Monism William M. Connolley (talk) 23:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)