User talk:K69

Hi, this is my talk page!

Welcome!

Hello, K69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Mexican Drug War
Hi, K69. Could you please stop making political statements on Wikipedia pages like you did to Mexican Drug War or Scientology? Wikipedia is not a soapbox, blog, or discussion forum. If you want to make personal statements related to Wikipedia, then you may use your userspace to do so, as long as it complies with User pages. --Apollo1758 (talk) 20:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jj horner.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jj horner.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Revere. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Paul Revere, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Jokestress (talk) 23:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC) [edit by Teque5 (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)]

Hi. I removed the links you added to Omegle and Cleverbot as, while humorous, they don't seem to belong on a serious encyclopedia like Wikipedia (in accordance with WP:NOT). Thank you. — Tommyjb  Talk!  (09:39, 8 June 2011)

Please unblock me
I'll be good I promise.

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

February 2012
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Propofol, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

What? Those revisions were all based of fact backed up by references. I'm going to start my own Wikipedia.

Blocked
Okay, you've had your fun. Adding defamatory links to fake news sites is clearly unacceptable. For at least the last four months, every edit of yours has been trolling, and your block log goes back even further. The last block was indefinite and reversed on the "one last chance" condition. I see no reason to believe you will be a constructive editor, and have reinstated that block. Kuru  (talk)  13:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of David Rabern for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rabern is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Rabern until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DarkAudit (talk) 02:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of JJ Horner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JJ Horner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JJ Horner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ploni (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)