User talk:KAP03/Archive 1

License tagging for File:Notaktologo.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Notaktologo.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, KAP03, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JudgeRM  (talk to me)  03:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Notaktologo.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Notaktologo.PNG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Counterwave Inc.


A tag has been placed on Counterwave Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Counterwave Inc. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Counterwave Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Counterwave Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Notakto (app)


The article Notakto (app) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NSOFTWARE with no strong secondary sources (the Children's Book and Media Review does not seem to be a significant review source): "Wikipedia is not a directory of all apps that can be confirmed to exist."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. A link to an app clicker game about an egg factory is not an appropriate "See also" link from Chicken. McGeddon (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Notakto (app) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notakto (app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Notakto (app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Magic15 (game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic15 (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Magic15 (game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 13:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Moving pages and copying content from one page to another
It is not acceptable to just copy content from one Wikipedia and past it into another one as a way of moving it, as doing so loses the editing history, which must be kept to satisfy Wikipedia's copyright terms. Also, if a page is deleted as a result of a deletion discussion, copies of it, whether under the same title or not, may be speedily deleted without notice. Attempting to evade the outcome of a deletion discussion by making new copies is not a good idea. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hackenbush logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Hackenbush logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Non free images
Wikipedia permits the use of non free images only in article, not any other pages, such as Wikipedia space pages, talk pages, user pages, etc etc. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Image sizes
Please don't change image sizes without a very good reason. WP:IMAGESIZE explains how image sizing works on Wikipedia - by saying that an image should be displayed at 230px instead of the default 220px, you're telling Wikipedia that this image should always be displayed at exactly 230px. If a user has their display preferences set to show all images at 400px instead of the default 220px, perhaps because they have poor eyesight, your specified image size will override that and display it at 230px.

If there's a good reason to resize an image you can do so using "upright=", but for images of tic-tac-toe boards, these all seem perfectly legible at the standard image size. --McGeddon (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Again, please don't do this. --McGeddon (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * And again, specifying to display an image at exactly 236 pixels width makes hardly any difference to a user seeing all other images at a default 220px, and a lot of unhelpful difference to a user who's set their preferences to display all images at 400px or 120px for whatever reason. Please don't specify fixed sizes for images. Do you understand these messages? --McGeddon (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Sweetie (apple)
Hello KAP03. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Sweetie (apple) as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because it is only for articles on real persons or groups, individual animals, organisations, web content and organised events. This article's topic is not within the ambit of that list. Adam9007 (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Notaktologo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Notaktologo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Afd4
I'm curious why you created this template. It appears to duplicate the function of Template:Afd2, but it contains errors. For example, clicking the edit button does not edit the AfD page. It edits the template. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The edit button works as it should by allowing you to edit the article the afd is on. KAP03 (talk)
 * The reason I came here is because it doesn't work on Articles for deletion/List of voting results of the National People's Congress of China. I don't know if you've fixed that. Still, even if it was fixed, it appears to be a duplicate. Is there a reason why you created the template? Just friendly curiousity. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems to work on Articles for deletion/List of voting results of the National People's Congress of China. KAP03 (talk) 02:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about the first edit button contained in []. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There is now a button labeled "Edit AfD". Clicking on it will allow you to edit the AfD page. KAP03 (talk) 04:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it still doesn't work properly and it's disruptive. Why can't you use the standard templates? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afd4
Template:Afd4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

AfD nominations
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates (such as welcome templates and user warnings) on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use instead of. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. I have just spent a considerable amount of time subst'ing the AfD templates on all of the articles which you have nominated for deletion. Without the substitution, none of your Article for deletion/dated tags ever actually added the nomination date or time to the article. (also, it's redundant with the standard afd template, which includes the date by default in any case.) For future nominations, please follow more closely the standard procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. 22:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magic Triangle (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Magic Triangle (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. st 170  e  18:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Magic Triangle (disambiguation)


The article Magic Triangle (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Completely unnecessary disambig page. There is a primary topic here and only two articles. We can easily use hat notes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. st 170  e  22:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I've removed the deletion template. I see what you've tried to do. Disambiguation articles can be speedily deleted if they only disambiguate two articles where there is a primary topic. This was the case, but you've forgotten to add in the third article of the same name. I'll do this now for you. st  170  e  23:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Asha Nautiyal
Hi. I'm not commenting on the promo tag, but a claim of being an MLA passes A7 for significance. If he isn't one, that's hoax, and as it's not blatant (unless one knows him well), that's an AfD matter. Peridon (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The user who created the article is User:Mrinalbenjwal and their only contributions are to this article suggesting WP:PROMOTION. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Spanish journalists
Hi, This is the reason I believe the "List of Spanish journalists" article I created yesterday should not have been deleted. I came across Antonio Fontán yesterday and made some edits there, and noticed that, although there are lists for journalists of many countries, there is/was no list for Spanish journalists. I understand that having a list with only one name on it is perhaps wasteful, but since this is Wikipedia I am assuming that other editors will come along and add names to this list, making it more useful in the future. Was I supposed to find a few more names to put on the list to make the page worthy of being created? That seems contrary to the way Wikipedia works. I have come across complete articles with very little content, which I assume will be enlarged over time if they are subjects worthy of being on Wikipedia. Is it possible that I was not supposed to create an "article" but rather a different "namespace" such as "a list" type of page? If so, I apologize, and would like some instructions on how to go about putting up the appropriate page which will be a place to put Antonio Fontán's name as a prominent Spanish journalist. Thank you. BloominOnion27 (talk) 06:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You can create the article in your user space (User:BloominOnion27/) or the Draft: space and then move it when it is ready. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 03:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from NewPagesFeed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have already done so. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 22:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

WP:GAMING
After the redirect to the Special namespace was deleted, you can't create a redirect to a Wikipedia namespace redirect that goes to the Special namespace. Double redirects do not work, and trying to find a loophole like this is WP:GAMING. I don't understand the point. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I wanted to make it easier to access Special:NewPagesFeed. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 00:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Subst AfD
Hi KAP03. When nominating an article for deletion, as you did with 2017 European Junior Championship of American football, please remember to substitute the template like this:. This way we assure the inclusion of the hidden text that enables the javascript most often used for closing AfD discussions to remove the Article for deletion template from the article. I removed it manually from 2017 European Junior Championship of American football. Thank you. — Sam Sailor 23:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

AfD nomination for U/chadpc
Hi there - I see you applied an AfD template on new article U/chadpc. Are you going to complete the process (there are 3 or 4 steps in total to go through)? If not, the article looks like a speedy deletion candidate to me, using "db-person". I will watch your talkpage for a response. Cheers!  PK T (alk)  16:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will complete the process. I have made the afd page aready and have added it today's afd log.. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions) 16:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

CARiD

 * Page CARiD is currently being discussed under WP:AfD. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

London Parliament (Monet painting)
I got a message from you about London Parliament (Monet painting). What was the content of this article, anyway? As far as I can tell, my only involvement was to move it to another title almost 10 years ago. (And if that was indeed the case, shouldn't we have just left it as a redirect?) I'll copy User:RHaworth. Zagal e jo^^^ 17:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Restored - not only was this a useful redirect, it is linked to from Claude Monet. I ask to explain why they blanked the page. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Zagal e jo^^^ 00:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

sos
broke my mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16kinga (talk • contribs) 18:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Data for Impact
Hi,

I'd created a page called Data For Impact, which was marked for speedy deletion and done so I guess. Wanted to let you know that I created that page because it is the name of a fellowship that has been launched by an organization in Delhi and I was created a page for the same. Intended to fill it in with more content shortly. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surendranb (talk • contribs) 08:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Firstly, remember that when using talk pages put new text below old text. Secondly you can use the draft namespace (Draft:) or your userspace to create your article and move it to the article namespace when ready. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions) 14:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hi!

Just a quick drop-by to say thanks for all your contributions on iOS articles. I really like your dedication to finding all sorts of changes in the operating systems! :)

Best regards, LocalNet (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello KAP03. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at 21th-century Filipino painters. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. — Non-Dropframe    talk  03:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Cram101
Hi, please don't use Cram101 as a source. These books copy Wikipedia: if you compare the wording of their entry to the article you can see it is a paraphrase of the start of the Wikipedia article lead. Don't just grab the first hit in Google Books. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

G7 for user pages
Hi KAP03. Just to let you know, I have declined your speedy deletion request for User:Vandhi100. If you take a closer look at WP:G7, it states, "If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page, a category page, or any type of talk page, this can be taken as a deletion request." (emphasis mine). The criterion is worded this way because it is not necessarily the case that when a user blanks their user page, they want the user page deleted. One legitimate reason for having a blank user page is to keep the signature link blue. Mz7 (talk) 05:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

My unexplained AfD template removal
Sorry for not adding an edit summary when I removed the AfD tag - I was multitasking in different tabs, got interrupted in real life, and lost track. The reason was that the tag had been placed by a sockpuppet of a banned user (and the afd page has since been speedy deleted), but obviously that has to be explained in an edit summary, which I failed to do this time. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 16:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Io games
Thanks for opening the AFD. I'm getting very tired of all of the useless articles from that user. Meters (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Sylvan Hills Freshman Campus
As far as I remember speedy delete comes after 15 minutes (here 5 only).Xx236 (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi KAP03,

I'm currently in a graduate program and this week's assignment was to create a wikipedia page from scratch. I went through the requested articles section of Wikipedia and found request for Megan Olivi. Seeing as she was the only person I recognized out of the request, I decided to make one for her. I was wondering if you would at least leave the page up for a week, just so I could get credit for the assignment. I would really appreciate it. Every other topic I tried already had a wiki page.TPH5201 (talk) 04:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sparkwave for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sparkwave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sparkwave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

ANTI (computer virus)
Thanks for indirectly reminding me about the deletion process, by nominating this article. I might start paying more attention to nominations.

Come join the light side. We welcome good editors who create useful content of encyclopedic standard, regardless of age. Familiarise yourself with WP:ATD and join us in improving Wikipedia the mature way, the way of people who solve problems directly instead of getting others to do it. --pmj (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

About orphan article
Hi, for the page Burak Davutoğlu, you had signed "orphan" because of not having links to the page. But now lots of page are linked to Burak Davutoğlu page. Could I remove the sign?

thanks, Frock~trwiki (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI, I've taken this article to AfD. -- Finngall   talk  15:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

speedy keep?
It seems odd that you're closing debates that have gone on for weeks as speedy keep. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No one but the nominator said to delete the article so the article can be speedily kept under WP:SKCRIT. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Flash-Gas Page Merger
Hello,

I agree that the concept of how flash gas is created is applicable to both refrigeration and petroleum production, however the implications are not very similar in the larger scheme. Perhaps we could distinguish the two by using Flash Gas (refrigeration) and Flash Gas (petroleum).

There is going to be much more information added to the petroleum flash gas page in the coming weeks, I will also work to add more sources to what is already on the page. Is there a way that I can take the information from the refrigeration page and create a sub-header titled "in refrigeration" on the Flash Gas page that I'm working on? I'm new to Wiki so I don't know if the official term is "sub-header" but I'm referring to the drop down tabs that contain all the various aspects of the topic. Any advice would be appreciated and I will do what I can to help resolve the issue on my end.

IkeLacy (talk) 18:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Does Not Commute
Hello, KAP03,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Does Not Commute should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Does Not Commute.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

L3X1 (distant write)  03:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

A closure of move request...
WP:RMCI and esp. WP:RMNAC states, .I would like you to kindly abide by the policy and self-revert your close.As a side-note, even when you are certainly certain about the validity of the close at all costs, avoid closing any discussion where you have opined.Also, take a look at the proper procedure for closing a move request at the afore-cited page.Take this as a piece of request from someone whose second closure at a discussion venue some-what led to a mess!Cheers! Winged Blades Godric 06:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Talk:IPad (7th generation) was the close which elicited this conversation. Winged Blades Godric 06:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your first GA nominee
You did not properly place the template on Talk:iOS 10, the talk page of your first GA nominee ever. Can you please replace with  on that talk page? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 01:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017
Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1
For future reference, do not edit the comment that says "Add new entries to the TOP of the following list" as you did in this edit; Twinkle I believe relies on this comment to place new AfDs. Cheers, ansh 666 05:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:IPad2017image.png
Thank you for uploading File:IPad2017image.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 06:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Before and offline sources
Hi KAP03, I don't know you, and don't know how you work. I just want to be sure you are aware that not everything is online, and that not all online sources are publicly available. WP:OFFLINE and FUTON bias are relevant. Lady of  Shalott  17:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Phase Master 20:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

File:IPad2017image.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPad2017image.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 20:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think you're understanding what a license is. A license is something like this. Adding Fair use rationale is not providing a license. After going through your uploads, you've done this for all of your images. Please replace these with the correct license. Also, a picture like this image listed for deletion needs to be on Wikimedia Commons, IF and ONLY IF, you are the original uploader. Since it came from the Apple website, I highly doubt you are the original author and would then be required to obtain permission from Apple. Thanks, Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 20:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

WP:FOOLS cleanups
Please note, April Fools is over. We do not need to run joke AFD's through MFD to get rid of them. They will either be dealt with by an admin, or you can nominate for CSD. — xaosflux  Talk 00:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And please don't record them for posterity on the talk page Siuenti (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Please go to Talk:AFD to discuss the 1st April AFD issue, Edit warring unfortunately ends one way, Thanks – Davey 2010 Talk 20:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd also suggest to stop the relisting until it is resolved how we are going to deal with the jokes. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

G6 on April Fools
Before reverting could you read and comment on the section linked to? There was a rough consensus there to delete the AfDs that had no participation. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

CSD
Hi, Don't worry about CSD'ing everything as everyone's now dealing with it, I would also ask you stop with the relists otherwise you could end up blocked (It's technically wp:disruptive editing), Regardless of that thanks for your help with everyone, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 03:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ok Golf for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ok Golf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ok Golf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RoCo (talk) 17:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 10
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IOS 10 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProgrammingGeek -- ProgrammingGeek (talk) 20:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 10
The article IOS 10 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:IOS 10 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProgrammingGeek -- ProgrammingGeek (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IPad2017image.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IPad2017image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Burak Davutoğlu
Hi KAP03,

Thanks for your comment at Articles for deletion/Burak Davutoğlu

I removed lots of links from article. For now, it has just 24. And, to make summery and make it easier for you, I've listed below that why this article suitable

(Just some examples) It says;

''"Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."

''Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include: University-level textbooks, Books published by respected publishing houses, Magazines, Journals, Mainstream newspapers. “Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language.”

We can see in important institute İstanbul City Theatres official play fragman here: Aldatma: here
 * He's the lead actor of his last plays Kerbela and Aldatma (Betrayal). These plays are notable in Turkey.


 * In this TV channel interview here, presenter says that "Başrol oyuncusu Burak Davutoğlu" (it means Lead actor) for Kerbela play and.


 * His TV dramas displayed on mainstream chanels, also in 17 countries in the world.
 * In this TV dramas, some of them he was the lead actor or he shared the roles with lead artists.

also;
 * In this filmograpy, you can see the productions here
 * He's not very famous actor but for example here, in this mainstream magazine, he's called as "famous actor" in an important project.
 * He’s the permanent actor of an important institute such as Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality City Theaters. (I prepared the article just for helping understand)
 * In some mainstream media publishments, we can see also his picture with the news text.
 * He’s the instructor of a professional institute Dialog Anlatım iletişim, which is certified by the Ministry of National Education.
 * He staged as a lead actor on an open-air theater which has 4000 audience capacity. (Kerbela)
 * He staged also at the international festivals.
 * He was displayed on the cover of the theater magazine that's being distributing all around Turkey. (ISSN: 1307-6965)
 * He has been one of the founders of cinema actors' professional association BIROY, which is an association to monitor, collect and distribute the copyright of the actors in the audiovisual field.


 * And also I edited, added some critics here

If there is something else I can do, I should do, I try to do again. If you change your decision, I'll be happy if you share.

Best regards,

Frock~trwiki (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

22:52 9 April 2017

Replaceable fair use File:MarbledSculpinImage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MarbledSculpinImage.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Notability
I noticed that you recently nominated Malhar Thakar for deletion. Please check Janki Bodiwala and Aarohi Patel for notability. All these three are associated with Gujarati cinema. I have copyedited and tagged last two. Regards, --Nizil (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Prompt Softech
I saw your notice of speedy deletion of prompt softech page in wikipedia. Please check, I added some more information for this page in one paragraph. It is right? please suggest me for it. Regards, Wmasterus (talk) 07:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

advice
Please do not mark pages as deletion because they're empty jus ttwo minutes after they've been written. Give the editor a chance to write them. As reviewing administrator, I removed your speedy tag from Influence of technology in music. If nothing is added after a day or two, that's another matter. It is extremely important not to discourage new contributors.

And while I'm here, I see that some of your deletion nomination have been speedy kept. The guidelines for notability here are not self-interpreting statements to be taken blindly, but need interpretation. The ways we interpret them are varied and sometimes inconsistent; they can only be learned from participation or at least observing multiple afd discussions, and especially the discussions at Deletion Review.  DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Find sources 3
FYI, your redirection of Template:Find sources 3 to Template:Find sources has broken Prod blp, as the former is allowed to be used in mainspace while the latter displays an error if you try to. I've reverted the edit. – Train2104 (t • c) 12:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

April Fools closes
Just fixing tool labs. Hope you don't mind me changing your closes.  J 947 (c)  23:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Aleksandr Bezak article
Hello, KAP03. The subject of the article was born in 1800. Everybody born that year should be dead be now. Zee money (talk) 04:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC) I have removed the deletion notice. If you put BLP tag on this article again, I will consider that vandalism. Zee money (talk) 04:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yandex.Market
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Yandex.Market, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: as a website by a notable company (Yandex), significance is indicated (cf. also WP:ATD-M). Thank you.  So Why  06:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries
User_talk:Necrothesp. It is not necessary to leave edit summaries on AfD pages, talk pages, etc. Only on articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, its not necessary to leave any edit summary lest you get told off by a user.Gonejackal (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * While edit summeries are not strictly required, they are highly desirable on ALL edits, including "AfD pages, talk pages, etc" DES (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Tagging of Calentito que nunca 2010 (Compilation album)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Calentito que nunca 2010 (Compilation album). I do not think that Calentito que nunca 2010 (Compilation album) fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "Latin GRAMMY nominated Puerto Rican singer " is a claim of significance, while "patent nonsense" is obviously absurd. The Patent nonsense criterion is quite narrow, and applies only to random text such as "sdhfejufekji" or random words. It does not apply to poor writing. I request that you consider not re-tagging Calentito que nunca 2010 (Compilation album) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 17:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like the page has been deleted per WP:G11. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 19:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank your for the information. G11 would have been arguable, and although I didn't think it justified, I probably won't raise the matter at deletion review. But please be careful with "patent nonsense" speedy tags in future. DES (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Can I help
May I plz help with this page Camden226 (talk) 03:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Talk page stalker here. To help you and avoid any confusion, Camden here is talking about the article Fidget Cube. Sky  Warrior  03:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrospect (software)
I've just done a first pass and a cleanup of my expansion of the lead of the Retrospect (software) article. Thanks for pointing out the need for it. I am therefore removing your tag. Please make any suggestions for improvement of the article's lead in its Talk page, where I have created a special section just for that purpose. If you feel that the article's lead is not yet substantially adequate, please let me know in the Talk page there, and I'll put the tag back.DovidBenAvraham (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing good faith content prior to completion of editing.
Please stop removing good faith content prior to completion of editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.0.181 (talk) 04:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Deleted Page - Eye 4 esports
Hello, I believe you have deleted a Page I was currently working on - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_4_esports

Please read below as to why we believe our page is relevant to this specific category. I have also included our website and examples of featured articles on industry media / platforms.

Eye 4 esports Ltd is a Professional Gaming Organisation and registered profitable esports Company established in the United Kingdom. E4 field teams in four major esports titles and represent the UK's best video game players and entertainers. With over 12,000 fans across social media channels, Eye 4 esports compete internationally across the regions largest events and is established as one of the UK's leading esports clubs in console gaming. E4 feature on mainstream TV, broadcasted to thousands of viewers and are covered by some of the industry's largest news and media platforms within the electronic-sports market.

Website - http://www.eye4esports.com

Press Articles: http://www.marca.com/esports/2016/02/03/56b1f66b268e3e76538b467d.html

http://es.dexerto.com/news/entrevista-wizards-lewtee/

http://es.dexerto.com/news/snmastercod-jornada-5-resultados-clasificacion/

http://cod.esportswikis.com/wiki/SocialNAT/Black_Ops_III/Master_League/Season_2

http://www.esports-news.co.uk/2017/03/02/e4-enter-overwatch/

http://www.esports-news.co.uk/2017/04/24/11374/

http://www.esports-news.co.uk/2017/04/15/eye-4-esports-acquire-fifa-player/

https://beyondesports.eu/mo004-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alextdesign (talk • contribs) 15:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 2019 Games of the Small States of Europe
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2019 Games of the Small States of Europe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: yearly article for a notable event (cf. Games of the Small States of Europe). Thank you.  So Why  06:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have nominated the article for deletion at AFD at Articles for deletion/2019 Games of the Small States of Europe. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Elijah Roberts
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Elijah Roberts, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'm no hockey expert but GNews hits indicate that he might be notable, user WP:AFD instead. Thank you.  So Why  08:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rewan Amin
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rewan Amin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing for a notable team indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  13:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

CSD tagging
Hi, I noticed that you had been getting a lot of declined speedy deletions recently and your Twinkle CSD log has a lot of blue in it from things that don't appear to be recreations (as is common for A1, A3, and G12). As a piece of advice from a fellow editor who is relatively involved with new pages when I have the time: I would highly suggest that you focus on work in the article mainspace (including things like copyediting) or go to the countervandalism academy, and do work in these areas before continuing to do speedy deletion work. Incorrect speedy deletion tagging is not ideal for several reasons: it could delete worthwhile pages and it also turns of new contributors. is a good resource to talk to if you have questions about CSD, and he might be able to chime in too. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Reeshav Kmr Kaushal
I notice you marked the article Reeshav Kmr Kaushal rather quickly after it was created. Normal Wikipedia etiquette is to wait at least 10 minutes for A7 deletion nominations. Thanks... red dogsix (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NewPagesFeed


A tag has been placed on NewPagesFeed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramaksoud2000 (talk • contribs)

Your un-did edit on macOS Sierra
On macOS Sierra, you undid my change. I didn't remove a reference, I removed the copy of the reference. There were 2 of the same references. I also corrected some errors in that edit. So I would appreciate it if you re-did my edit. Thanks! Alsamrudo (talk)

Tagging of Giardino Papadopoli
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Giardino Papadopoli. I do not think that Giardino Papadopoli fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because The mention of Venice in the article, even if not linked gave ample context. I request that you consider not re-tagging Giardino Papadopoli for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. Please be more careful with CSD tags, Remember that if a quick google search will fid the subject, or if a reasoanble deduction from the text of the article will identify it, a no-context deletion is not appropriate. DES (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fidget spinner
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fidget spinner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rhetoricalnoodle -- Rhetoricalnoodle (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Egg, Inc.
Hello, KAP03,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Egg, Inc. should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Egg, Inc..

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Devopam (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries
You've reverted two of my edits on iOS 10 via TW with no explanation in the edit summary. As a conscientious editor, I take care in my editing and would appreciate at least a brief reason as to why you disagree. Ponydepression (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Neotel (cycling team)
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Neotel (cycling team), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: competiting in a notable circuit indicates significance. Thank you.  So Why  07:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fidget spinner
The article Fidget spinner you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fidget spinner for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rhetoricalnoodle -- Rhetoricalnoodle (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:4x


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:4x, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Redirecting of Khatra (Album by Yama Buddha)
why did you redirect the page to Yama Buddha

Lelukai (talk) 15:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hasty tagging
I'm not quite sure tagging Tallinna keskraamatukogu one minute after it was created was ideal. From what I can tell, it wasn't recreated and it certainly isn't advertising. The editor could have been trying to build the article, and there appears to be an article on a another Wikipedia about it, and Google suggests that it might in fact be notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I think hasty only applies to speedy criteria WP:A1 and WP:A3 not WP:A7. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 16:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no formal rule, but the library you tagged a minute after creation was certainly significant: it was the first town library in the entire country . That wasn't in the article at the time, but very well could have been if the creator had more than 60 seconds to update the information. Tagging an article that isn't malicious or bad faith within a minute of creation is very much WP:BITE. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)