User talk:KAP03/Archive 2

Speedy deletion declined: Himachali Cinema
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Himachali Cinema, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: ‘’’Wrong criterion and article has already been the subject of a deletion discussion’’’ Thank you. ''' Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP
Hi KAP03. We appreciate your enthusiasm, but I really think you ought to stop patrolling new pages now until you have significantly more experience. The many messages on your talk page show that your accuracy is not sufficient for this task. Perhaps you would like to patrol for vandalism instead. Check it out at WP:CVU. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Goldco Precious Metals


The article Goldco Precious Metals has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional article created by a sockpuppet farm. See Sockpuppet investigations/Drabsi Jimmy."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Guanaco 13:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Goldco Precious Metals


A tag has been placed on Goldco Precious Metals, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Guanaco 13:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Goldco Precious Metals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goldco Precious Metals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Goldco Precious Metals& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Guanaco 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Apple Inc. WikiProject Reviving
Hello there, I am trying to revive the Apple WikiProject. Please come back and add your name to the participant list if you'd like to help me. Let's make this awesome. Come by today! Thank you, DJAustin (talk) 14:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP warning
Hi KAP03. Please stop patrolling articles now - your patrolling is disruptive. This is the final request - if you continue to patrol pages you may be blocked without further warning. Flip (app) is software, so it is ineligible under A7. Draft:Outdoor ministry had a lot of links that were questionable, but they were easily removed and the core of the prose was not spam, and since it is a broad concept rather than a specific group, it doesn't fit clearly into any of the other CSD criteria. As has been suggested before here, you need more experience in other areas of Wikipedia before you work with new pages. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Dear KAP03: I'm woodschain175, I will  supply resource for my posts, arxiv:1605.03430V2,it has not been published yet. It does not invol any trouble of copyright. I want to submit my job to a high quality journal but it's not a easy thing. I will submit it to an open publication if I know readers are intersting to  it. I want to test in wikipedia. Please give me an opportunity to show my work to readers and do not delete  my posts.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodschain175 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fruit Ninja
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fruit Ninja you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please help me to improve my work
Dear KAP18: I learned several materials related and know follow things. 1 avoid linking to Arxiv. That's not allowed by them. 2 There is risk about conflict of interest with journal to which my paper will submit. 3 Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. I want post it on talk page and ask other people to give me their opinions about it then I can improve my work. It’s difficult for me to discuss my work with people. I’m an engineer and don’t work in a university. However contents in my post are enough simple to be understand. I want to know if my statement is clear enough and how difficult for it to be accepted by people. Please help me to do this thing. I participated ICM 2010 in Hederabad.

Thanks!Woodschain175 (talk) 09:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fruit Ninja
The article Fruit Ninja you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fruit Ninja for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Prods
Please see WP:NOLY. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Citation overkill (contrary opinions)
Not sure why you created it. I don't get it. QuackGuru ( talk ) 16:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

I still don't get it. The redirect has no value. QuackGuru ( talk ) 15:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Can you let me know what is the potential benefit of this redirect. It was one of many names editors thought might be used for a new essay. The current name I chosen is simpler. As far as I can tell the redirect does not have potential for use with a future discussion. I don't understand the purpose of creating redirects that don't seem to be of value. QuackGuru ( talk ) 23:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please don't remove Afd comments
I'm not going to template you, but we do not have the right to remove another editor's comments from an Afd discussion, except in extreme circumstances. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Transplanting
No i am right Harshiamthe1 (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

IOS 12 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IOS 12. Since you had some involvement with the IOS 12 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WPIS listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPIS. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WPIS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atmosphere of Uranus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atmosphere of Uranus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sandvich18 -- Sandvich18 (talk) 13:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I see that you haven't contributed to the Atmosphere of Uranus article. Do you plan on assisting me with your nomination still? Sandvich18 (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Husband of anne askew
Hello KAP03. I am just letting you know that I deleted Husband of anne askew, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your edit to Carriage
Please read Historical present (I linked it in the edit summary) to explain why this is not "unnecessary". If you checked the revision history, you would have seen that I was correcting my own work—sadly this is something in which I have become well-practised.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 08:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, as I was finishing off my own edit I'm going to put it back.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:G10 material picture.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:G10 material picture.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Incremental games
Template:Incremental games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Plural of "ABS" is the same as plural of "ATM" ("ATMs"), etc.
I started a discussion about pluralizing "ABS" as "ABSs"--that is, "anti-lock braking systemS" the same way as we pluralize "ATM" as "ATMs," etc. Will you please show this other editor why that's correct with me?

Thanks if so, 174.23.105.242 (talk) 22:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC))

Undoing of my edits of the Hurricane Maria article
Hi. I don't understand the wholesale reversal of my very recent edits of the Hurricane Maria article. I believe my verb tense correction is correct. The shortening of the naming of the Smith Act was done to save space, the article already being over 100K in size and the text of that paragraph verbose. My readding of 'respectively' is debatable, but just an editorial difference between editors. Reversing someone's edit involving wording is certainly allowed short of the three revert rule. I admit I mistyped it. I don't find my edits "unconstructive", and I don't feel I need to review Wikipedia's rules. Sorry, but can you undo your action, and let the pending changes process proceed? Or is there something else I need to consider? Thanks for your consideration. 132.198.151.86 (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought you had broken a link. I have reverted my revert. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 132.198.151.86 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kostas20142 -- Kostas20142 (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass
The article Glass you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Glass for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kostas20142 -- Kostas20142 (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 10
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IOS 10 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PiGuy3 -- PiGuy3 (talk) 03:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 10
The article IOS 10 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:IOS 10 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PiGuy3 -- PiGuy3 (talk) 04:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Love Don't Live Here Anymore
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Don%27t_Live_Here_Anymore

The Wiki entry for Love Don't Live Here Anymore states that it "incorporated the use of the Electronic LinnDrum machine" - except the LinnDrumm didn't exist, and wouldn't exist for several more years. The electronic drum used in the song is the Pollard "Syndrum" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollard_Syndrum), which was the first synth-based drum system used in popular music. The music video for the song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5gFAiPJhvI) shows the Syndrum "TwinDrum" system being played.

The LinnDrum is a drum machine that has buttons on the front for programming - it wasn't ever intended to be used in live situations, and, as can easily be confirmed, didn't exist in 1977 when the song was being recorded.

Thus, my edit to the article.
 * First, sign your posts with four tilde (It makes it easier to know that the comment above is from you). Second, please try to explain your edits through an informative edit summary. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 04:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Glass
Hello, and thank you for your significant contribution to Glass. Unfortunately, the article did not pass the criteria required for GA. However please do not let this discourage you-quite the opposite. The main problem was that the article required too many improvements when you nominated, and you managed to make most of them during this period. So, please continue contributing to it, and I am looking forward to see Talk:Glass/GA2! --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass
The article Glass you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Glass for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kostas20142 -- Kostas20142 (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Merlin (poem)
Your IP reverted and I just rolled back his edits. You might want to check it. Atsme 📞📧 20:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Senglea Athletic F.C.
Dear KAP03, I refer to your messege regarding "Unconstructive editing on Senglea Athletic F.C.", which unfortunately can be considered a mistake. I have merely updated the squad list, which was outdated (from 2000s), respectfully there's nothing constructive or unconstructive about that. Admittedly, I have used sources which I forgot to reference and I would be very glad to list them, however the sources were also not fully updated - I was actually watching the match live so I could take note of the footballers playing. Kindly note that I shall be logging into my username, (which I should have done in the first place) and reupdate where necessary. The team of the article in question, is now playing in a top-tier league and has therefore gained some more notability, thus deserving an updated squad list. 88.203.8.125 (talk) 20:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I have undone that edit. However, could you use a edit summary on your edits to explain your changes? -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 22:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding, I have noted your suggestion and will make sure to leave a summary next time. Tsum60 (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SP:NPF


A tag has been placed on SP:NPF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Khufu
What do you mean? My edits were fine! I found them at a website about the Pharaoh's of Ancient Egypt. Do not respond to this message Kind Regards, Kachur — Preceding unsigned comment added by WizKachur (talk • contribs) 14:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Can you help me thwart some nonsense, please?
I noticed that you've been working on anti-lock braking system fairly recently; particularly with an interest in merging the motorcycle version of into there. I agree about the merge. Should you and I devise a plan on how to mesh the stuff together?

I have another issue with that article. I just did a whole bunch of corrective work there, tidying the article up from several little miscellaneous errors (mine are the 4 most recent 103... IP edits), and then along comes some bozo who erases all my work and falsely accuses me of being a banned editor! Who does he think he is, reverting my edits and and assuming such a grave label onto me like that, likely without even checking my edit history for evidence? And if he reverted my edits there for that reason, then why hadn't he reverted all my other edits for the same reason?

I don't really want to try to reason with the guy; it seems like all I'd get is some kind of crap back from a rogue editor. And if I revert his reversion, won't he just fight with me until the cows come home? Probably so. I know I could report him, but it seems like IP editors always lose those battles in front of admins no matter what; they are not fair fights, unfortunately. Anyway, what do you think should be our next step? Do you think you could kindly throw a dog or two into the fight and restore my edits, and standing up strong against this vandal with me? Where do we go from here? 103.253.146.206 (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hahaha, you're gonna edit the article about ABS plastic but not talk to me about edits on this (vehicular) type of ABS? 103.253.146.206 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Using Twinkle with kindness
KAP03, recently you reverted the edits of an IP editor in the articles on magnetism and electromagnetic field. Did you really mean to call his efforts vandalism? Note that Twinkle has an extensive menu of warnings, with vandalism being the default. What you really needed was uw-mos1 (Manual of Style).

Please try to be nice to new editors. This one was only trying to add citations and didn't understand how to do it properly. RockMagnetist(talk) 20:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 9
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IOS 9 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProgrammingGeek -- ProgrammingGeek (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Rescue
Hi. Even though I have edited a lot in Wikipedia, I never understood or had explained to me the rationale behind "rescuing sources" How would one know that the sources were discarded intentionally? Thanks, --Smokefoot (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

1000 miles of corn
this is a trophy game between purdue and iowa and I was in the process of putting more information into this page with win loss records longest win streak largest margin of victory and I was about to source my page when I say that it was flagged for deletion. I am a new member here and this is the first Wikipedia page that I have created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budde85 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

I added some souces for my information and I added a generic image to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budde85 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

I made some more edits to this page. I added a table to show the history of the Purdue vs Iowa rivalry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budde85 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Strength of glass) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Strength of glass, KAP03!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Unless this topic can be substantially expanded, it should probably be incorporated into Glass."

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Archive URLs
I'm not sure if your bot is doing as intended, but was it actually your intention to slap archive URLs on more than 60 live refs in Coconut? The idea behind those being to provide archived material in case of dead links, I question whether it makes sense to bloat the code by adding one to just about every non-dead link. Can you tell me what guideline you are working from here? Cheers -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Just saying, it is not my bot. It is run by User:Cyberpower678, not me. Also it seems something is wrong with your response that is causing everything to be italicized. Actually, I realized what happened. You seem to have forgotten to put in the "i" into the  tag (By the way I use the Visual Editor for most edits). -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the italics. So, this is your edit though, isn't it? -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Same thing at Ox, I see. What is the motivation behind adding archive URLs to dozens of live links? -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, in looking deeper into that, I find (at WP:WBM) that providing an archive link along with live URLs is actually encouraged. Not sure I agree with the code clutter, but anyway; never mind. Cheers -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Fruitwood) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Fruitwood, KAP03!

Wikipedia editor Gatemansgc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I don't see why not. Redirect to Wiktionary is perfectly reasonable here."

To reply, leave a comment on Gatemansgc's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Gatemansgc (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Moving Further reading below External links
Why are you moving Further reading sections below External links in Essay. According to Manual of Style/Layout Further reading comes first. StarryGrandma (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I have reverted these edits. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 05:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. StarryGrandma (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atmosphere of Uranus
The article Atmosphere of Uranus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atmosphere of Uranus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sandvich18 -- Sandvich18 (talk) 15:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Bobby Beausoleil edits
Received your message. Was it an automated message? Being a knowledgeable art culture historian and a good writer, I am dismayed by the suggestion that I should go fool around in the sandbox. As I noted when making the new entries, much of the existing information is erroneous, laced with hysterical pop culture hyperbole. I am very familiar with Bobby Beausoleil’s history and his body of artworks and I am attempting to correct the record in relation to him.

I would like to have wiki’s support in these efforts. You will note that I have been using proper citations in correcting the information. Only modest changes were made, again, properly cited. For example, Beausoleil’s father was not a milkman and he did not go to a reform school.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Again, I hope for your support.

BeBeDahl

P.S. I will reinsert my edits so that you can review them in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeBeDahl (talk • contribs) 19:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Golf Zero
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. KAP03, thanks for creating Golf Zero!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 13:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

modifications on page Soil
Dear KAP03,

Can you tell me why you modified the references I had updated on the page devoted to Soil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil). I do not understand the meaning of your changes, which were annotated "Rescuing 128 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.1)". I scrutinized all the references which had been added (most of them by myself) since the beginning of the year, and checked whether they were still operational or needed to be refreshed. Can you explain what you want to do, and what I have to do from my side? In the meantime, I will delete your modifications. I apologize for the trouble, if any... jfp 16:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah. It thinks EVERYTHING is dead.  Hit detonation too.  AManWithNoPlan (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Could you stop reverting me. See the page Wikipedia:WBM which is ok with providing archive URLS to live links. Also, not all of the links are dead. The tool I use (IABot Management Interface) allows me to check all live (and possibly dead links) for archive URLs. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 16:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear KAP03, please let me do this task with my old-fashioned methods. I am busy with this page from the beginning of the year, adding a lot of sources and making additions or deletions when needed. No need of robots, except to detect vandalism, of course. Thank you for your understanding jfp 16:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfponge (talk • contribs)
 * People please stop this madness. See the on this page -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 17:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please stop doing this to google book URLs. They are not primary references (they are photocopies of actual reference); so, they themselves are an archive of the original.  Secondly, it is highly unlikely that they will every go away.   AManWithNoPlan (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The purpose of archiving a live page is to make sure you have a copy of how is is now. So, it is really a bad idea for the google books, since they should never change.  AManWithNoPlan (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Cite error in named reference
Hi KAP03, your edit of Compression (physics) resulted in the error Cite error: The named reference  was invoked but never defined. I just fixed it. Please be careful with your edits! --GünniX (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Chess
What was the point of your edit of 23:51, 23 December 2017 to Chess? It appears that there was no visible modification, and no bad references were fixed, but the article is now 9,724 characters larger. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I see that my question was already asked and answered a month ago in your talk page.
 * Bleah. Many of these links are such that, if they went bad, the text that references them would also be bad.  (For example, if www.olympic.org/world-chess-federation were to disappear, it would be wrong for the text to refer to an archive version.)  So it doesn't make sense to provide archive links.  I don't see how a bot can figure that out, though.  Bruce leverett (talk) 03:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Fiji
Hello KAP03, I put the new picture Fiji (orthographic projection.svg) on the article because it is consistent with other countries. Examples: (See Russia, Canada, and China). Thank you.74.104.173.120 (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 9
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IOS 9 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MacOS
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MacOS you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosguill -- Rosguill (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MacOS
The article MacOS you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:MacOS for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosguill -- Rosguill (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 9
The article IOS 9 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:IOS 9 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

smart glass
You should reference US patent 8635817 in the Sunvalve smart glass discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.172.216 (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:FOOLS
Remember to remove the REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD line if you make any more joke AfDs. Thanks, ansh 666 04:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

INCONVIENCE
sorry about that its been my first time,sorry for the inconvience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extra words (talk • contribs) 14:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

SP:NPF listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SP:NPF. Since you had some involvement with the SP:NPF redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Sand geyser
I believe I have improved this article to the point where it should be retained rather than deleted. Please take a look and tell me what you think. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  21:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Trevor Powers/Youth Lagoon
Hi there, could you please help me move the page "Youth Lagoon" to the page "Trevor Powers" to satisfy wikipedia requirements. It should be a section under "trevor powers" since it is a past project by the artist. I had previously added the " trevor powers" page to reflect the accurate status of the artist, but now I see this first needs to be merged to satisfy requirements, and I don't have administrative access. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Posthocinfo (talk • contribs) 15:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Galaxy formation and evolution
> ''Hello, I'm KAP03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Galaxy formation and evolution have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 04:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)''

Can you please be more specific? What have you undone, and why? Thanks KAP03 Ellery Jones (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Funk
I don't see this editor lasting long. See Talk:Jesus where I've commented on his edits and added a link to a source for Funk. Doug Weller talk 17:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

SNS on nail polish page
It wasn't promotional, it is, in fact a new type/kind of nail polish/method of coloring them, if you reverted that, why not the Shellac as well? Seems inconsistent. 173.76.164.40 (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That was exceedingly promotional. And I have reverted the "shellac" bit, which was promotional also.  That said, two wrongs do not make a right, only three lefts do.     78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 02:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you please tell me why it's promotional? It's a new kind of nail polish/treatment, I just wanted to add information about it, not to promote a company. So, you're saying if a certain company offers it, we can't talk about it because it's promotional, then you'd have to delete a page like on crispy creme donuts, but have you done that? 173.76.164.40 (talk) 04:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Historic sites in Wales
Yes I know the cat doesn't exist. I'm requesting that it be created. It should be listed under Category:Historic sites by country but is missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.206.52 (talk) 05:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

My Edit of African Socialism
I see that you reverted my edits to African Socialism. They were correct. The publisher's name is always "Weidenfeld & Nicolson", not "Weidenfeld and Nicholson". See Weidenfeld & Nicolson if you don't believe me. --Alan W (talk) 05:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Sir
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -YouHaveFoundBiox

Also I did not do vandalism I was just deleting the stuff that didn't belong like train accidents because it was an error by the person who got killed or injured by the train...

Next time follow the rules sir...(TheFloridianTraveler (talk) 05:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC))

Reincarnation
I do not know why it was 'unhelpful' of me to try to help others, by sharing personal TRANSPERSONAL experience. I know (a 'ken', inner knowing) that the soul, our individual souls and the ONE (ceator) Soul - have no ENDURING gender, race, religion embedded into it. This, I would have thought, would be VERY helpful to those thousands upon thousands of people (globally) who have gender difficulties, for feminists and those who feel marginalised due to their 'this life' gender experience, amongst other reasons. I reiterate: the Soul has no gender, race, religion etc. This is very important, actually because, for those who know that reincarnation is 'real' (such as myself), one (that is the person 'now') has had many past lives, lived in many different bodies, cultures, countries, religions and of course periods in history. The crucial thing is: THIS life determines our next incarnation. How we live our life now, the nature of our soul (linked intimately with our thoughts, feelings, words and actions), whether we are of good character, or bad is judged accordingly (even if one does not-choose to- believe in a creator God, the 'laws of karma', for instance, in a non-monotheistic religion, overlap in their wisdom: this is surely a fact that if we lead a good, moral, upright life then we will be 'rewarded' in the life to come; it is simply 'cause and effect' (Judaism demands an ethical existence, by way of loving the creator God and keeping His Commandments; and does mention rewards and potential punishment, and that God defies the bounds of death...Christianity, of course echoes this theme. Buddhism also maintains that the work we do in this life will affect the rebirth). Yet, the soul 'our' soul, is continuous; life and death, and rebirth, is a journey 'of the soul' if you like...which takes on different bodies, as mentioned; ideally in order to learn, develop and grow (the 'reward' part). Regarding the 'punishment' part, I feel I know, through Judaism for instance, that God is essentially a loving God and encourages repentance for errors, wrongs(and, as Oscar Wilde said: to err is human). 'God allows for human steps..' So if, for instance, a person was wicked and maybe racially prejudiced to the point of murder - in the life to come / the 'judgement' that person could CHOOSE to reincarnate in the body of a person from that very race or culture that s/he vilified previously. By doing so, they would learn and become wiser, but also be able to demonstrate Goodness (love for the family in which they are born, for instance) to rectify their past wrongs, and will be judged accordingly. If they maintain goodness, their soul will reflect this, 'heal' (I believe that the mechanism for this is by way of....continuous judgements ... and if deserving, then 'stains' on the soul could be erased. As Judaism asserts (for instance, during the annual Yom Kippur; Day of Atonement and during the full 10 Days of Awe (from Jewish New Year to Yom Kippur) our judgement lies 'in the balance' and we ask God to be 'written into the Book of Life...for a Good Life...' and, of course this is a special and most holy day of repentance, when one examines their life over the past year, and asks, maybe begs God to forgive them (and of course, they must 'do the work' and demonstrate, by being a better person, in thoughts, words and deeds, that they indeed do wish to repent. And so it continues (how our character develops, consequences of every minute action, which includes thoughts: cause & effect, 'karma' and so on) So BECAUSE THE SOUL IS GENDERLESS, HAS NO RACE, RELIGION etc...one can EXPERIENCE different cultures and outlooks and ways of life and learn great things. MS0017 (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)6/8/18 Reincarnation is a SPIRITUAL mechanism, and as such, there are no 'academic' references, how can there be? When Moses received the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai, did he ask if there were references to back up what he was receiving? No! It was Faith, based on trust. Qualitative rather than quantitative. So I beg to differ in your assessment of my contribution. MS0017 (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 06/08/2018
 * See Verifiability and WP:Original research. You must provide reliable sources to content that you add to Wikipedia even if you "know" it is true or have experienced it. Also, Wikipedia is not the place to publish personal opinions (see WP:NOTESSAY) or promote your personal beliefs (see WP:NOTPROMO). -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 04:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

File:FidgetCube.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FidgetCube.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. kyykaarme (talk) 11:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Stunna life biography


A tag has been placed on User talk:Stunna life biography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CryptoKitties for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CryptoKitties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CryptoKitties until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Synthetic rope


The article Synthetic rope has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "See Rope"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roxy, in the middle . wooF 08:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Synthetic rope


The article Synthetic rope has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: See Rope. Note that this prod was removed without explanation so it has been replaced

Also see Fibre Rope Which was not deprodded without explanation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roxy, in the middle . wooF 07:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Synthetic rope for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthetic rope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Synthetic rope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roxy, the Prod . wooF 13:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Weighted blanket) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Weighted blanket.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:NSPACE


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:NSPACE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &#91;Username Needed&#93; 14:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice regarding a user script
Hi. Recently, a request was made for someone to revise the User:Bility/convert24hourtime.js user script. I (DannyS712) took up that challenge, and have fixed the bug with the "thanks" button, fixed the bug regarding blocked users, fixed the bug regarding converting the times when examining a diff, and even added the feature to convert times when looking at logs. I have some more features planned, but I thought that, since you are currently importing Bility's script, you may want to know that a less buggy version is available at User:DannyS712/12Hours. This is intended as a one-time note. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Merger discussion for KidZui
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;KidZui&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mrwoogi010 &#9993;  17:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Trick r Treat
If you don't think that my revisions are una autentica poronga, we'll just have to disagree, but the dog's name is Spite, not Spike, so please don't undo that change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinDaCosta (talk • contribs) 17:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Photography
I ask who are you to say that my edits in Photography are not constructive. The page is totally corrupted making a shameful mistake between Photography & Art and I am trying to avoid this confusion to naive people who tend to believe everything they read on the web. If you think my logical text was not constructive then do it better and fix that tremendous error in this page.

PHOTOGRAPHY IS ONE THING. ART IS ANOTHER. PHOTOGRAPHY MAY USE ART FORMS TO CREATE AN IMAGE (VISUAL ARTS). ART MAY USE PHOTOGRAPHY TO CREATE A PIECE OF ART. (VISUAL ARTS).

NOW IF THE PHOTOGRAPH DO NOT INVOLVE ANY KIND OF TECHNICAL OR INTELLECTUAL USE OF ART, IT'S (PHOTOGRAPHY) BECAUSE THE MEDIUM WAS PHOTOGRAPHY. SO PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART. it's a science, a technique and a profession.

IT'S LOGICALLY SIMPLE.

You're not being smart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrthekx (talk • contribs) 06:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Tesla model y
Can you please stop redirecting the article. You are making it worse. Thanos2556 (talk) 05:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.
Hello ,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.
 * RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

April Fools AfDs
Hey - please follow the instructions at WP:FOOLS, namely removing the REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD template. ansh 666 04:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Academic honor code
An explanation WAS provided in the edit summary: "attempts to peacock VMI as different from the other SMC with respect to toleration in the honor code, not notable" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.58.103 (talk) 18:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass
The article Glass you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Glass for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IPhone OS 1 screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IPhone OS 1 screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

"C-size" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect C-size. Since you had some involvement with the C-size redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 23:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

International Franchise Association Speedy Delete
Hi, I saw your mark of the page I created for a speedy delete, and I wanted to ask about reconsidering that as I don't think the original criteria for deletion apply any longer. I'm new here, so trying to figure all this out. Anyway, the page was originally created/deleted 7 years ago, with notes that it wasn't well-sourced and concerns about whether the org was notable enough, so I sourced this page from reputable sources like ProPublica, CNBC, etc. This is a group that is suing states and cities over labor legislation and spending millions on lobbying lawmakers, so I do think they fit the guidelines on notability in the public's interest (I didn't want to put too much of that on the page because I wanted to be impartial). To request a reconsideration for a deleted page, Wikipedia directs you to contact the deleting author, but that account hasn't been active in a year or so so this was my next step.

Given the above, would you reconsider the deletion? I'd appreciate it.

Editing1002 (talk) 00:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Introduction into superheavy elements
Hi! I see you have moved Superheavy element/Short introduction from the article space to the template space. While this section is indeed transcluded into several other articles, please note that the existing policy explicitly transclusion from the article space. See Transclusion:
 * When two pages need to discuss the same material in the same way, they can share a section. This involves creating a third page and transcluding that page onto both pages. This third page may be a page in its own right or a subpage of either of the other two, and if the first it may be placed in the same namespace as the other pages or in template namespace.

I have preferred to keep the repeated text in the article space because this introduction is not supplementary to encyclopedic content, like templates are; it is encyclopedic content, so it is logically stored in the same namespace as the rest of such content. Moving to the Template namespace may, I'm afraid, make some novice editors not want to mess with the "technical" part of Wikipedia, but this part should not look any more difficult than the rest of articles. So would you please move it back to the original location?--R8R (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)