User talk:KATMarketing

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SoWhy 11:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * When a client pays a marketing company to publish material about them, that is pretty much a definition of promotion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Energypeople


A tag has been placed on Draft:Energypeople, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —  Wasell ( T ) 13:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Comment
You obviously shouldn't be allowed to abuse Wikipedia in return for payment, but you also seem to believe that you can own an article on behalf of your client. That's not correct. I was beaten to it by another admin when I attempted to delete the article, but what you wrote also didn't meet the recently updated notability guidelines for organisations and companies. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll also point out that the draft article read is if it was written by a marketing department or marketing company (which, in fact, it was) and the style of writing used in marketing is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)