User talk:KBuck

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Garion96 (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

LFI
I have no connection whatsoever or any particular sympathy with Labour Friends of Israel. The fact that I don't agree with POV edits that seem to imply some kind of conspiracy doesn't make me part of that supposed conspiracy. Even if I were a member or supporter of LFI, you could try and assume good faith and consider that I am still capable of edits free of POV, whatever my personal point of view.

When you have approached a good number of other socialist societies and found whether LFI's practice is exceptional for that kind of organisation, it would then be a pertinent fact, which can be put into context. Whatever, this is Original Research and doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia unless you can find a credible verifiable source to back this statement up. Mtiedemann 09:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Static interpretation of time for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Static interpretation of time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Static interpretation of time until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Opal&#124;zukor (discuss) 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)