User talk:KCVelaga/Archive 3

TFL notification
Hi, Krishna. I'm just posting to let you know that List of destroyers of India – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 5. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 23:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of INS Vikrant (R11)
Hello! Your submission of INS Vikrant (R11) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yakikaki (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Image in signature
I think, you should remove that Ashok Chakra image from your signature. Use of images in signature is discouraged and there is a community consensus against it (WP:SIGIMAGE). Thank you. Anup  [Talk]  14:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not only discouraged, it's not allowed. Primefac (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you both for informing, changed it. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Singapore
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

A request to speed up deletion......
You recently took the article List of office-holders in Punjab, India to AfD.But,since you were the creator and no other editors have made any significant edit to the article, you could nominate it under G7, speedily deleting it,saving a lot of time and energy.You may also want to go througthere entire AfD and wait for consensus.Thanks! Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 09:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thanks. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of INS Vikrant (R11)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article INS Vikrant (R11) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sam Manekshaw you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC
Hi. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw
The article Sam Manekshaw you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sam Manekshaw for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup
Hi Krishna. I just noticed that the articles you have been revieweing were not checked for copyright violations/plagarism. Therefore, while checking your reviews I found that two of your reviews have had blatant, 89% plagarism. From this point onwards, we will require you to check your articles for copyright violations to satisfy the requirement of having a complete review. If you do not comply, and we find another article that has copyright violations, we will have to disqualify you. Thanks! Mr WooHoo (T  • C''' ) 16:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Krishna. I just double checked the plagarism, but it turns out that those two sources that had had plagarism were actually because the website had used Wikipedia (practically a mirror site). Apologies for the misunderstanding. However, I still strongly recommend that you use Earwig's copyvio tool on the articles you review. Thanks! Mr WooHoo (T  • C''' ) 16:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have used them. Anyway thanks for reminding me. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

List of National Defence Academy alumni
Hi! The sub-sections of this list are quite complicated and not easy to surf. Currently they are divided as Chief of Staffs (A, N, A), Wartime Award Recipients (PVC, MVC, VC), Peacetime award recipients (AC, KC, SC). Can this be revamped to simple three sections as Army, Navy and Air Force? I know it's a lot of work but we would bring down 10 lists to just 3. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Obviously no. For examples, see List of United States Air Force Academy alumni and List of United States Naval Academy alumni. They are divided based on the notability criteria, not the services. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Because they are of institutes of a specific service, not like how we have here where all three services are catered to. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't have any opinion on this. Actually the list have also passed an A-Class review from MILHIS. I would like to ping, the lead coordinator of MILHIS, to comment on this. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * G'day, I can see benefits in both approaches, but to be honest I don't know much about lists. The best suggestion I have would be to put the list through FLC to see what they say about it, or ask some of the regulars there for an opinion. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Take this to the FLC archive page. So that community can voice their opinions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:05, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Goa Opinion Poll
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Goa Opinion Poll. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kodandera M. Cariappa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kodandera M. Cariappa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw
The article Sam Manekshaw you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sam Manekshaw for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You mentioned that you've passed the article, but what is this? Also I can't see any GA logo on the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Weird. I'll check it out. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Any update on this? I added Article history to the talk page, and what about the top icon? Also also posted a message on LegoBot's talk page. And one more, would suggest a c/e from GOCE before I take the article further (ACR, FAC)? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll put the GA icon on, we used to do it manually back in the day... I saw that you'd asked about Legobot, but I'm not sure how well patrolled that page is, so I've posted on the GA talk page as well. As far as Manekshaw is concerned, I'd ask for a GOCE c/e and look more widely at the various quotes in the obit's with a view to adding them in to give more of a sense of his personality. You'll also need to tidy up the citations and references sections if you want it to get through ACR. I'd use sfn throughout and use cite news etc to anchor the citations. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and also sorry for trouble you had with the review. Actually this is my first GA, and also can you explain what do you mean by "sfn throughout and use cite news etc to anchor"? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of INS Vikrant (R11)
The article INS Vikrant (R11) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:INS Vikrant (R11) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Krishna. I'm just posting to let you know that 1982 Asian Games medal table – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 03:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

November 2016 Military History Writers' Contest

 * Well done Krishna! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Face-wink.svg Thanks Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for uninentional vandalism of a particular page.
Hey I'm very sorry for unintentionally vandalising the page. My intention was to put up a tabular form of Srihari's movies list. As I'm new to Wikipedia so I pretty much don't know the basics. Sorry once again. PradeepKumar308 (talk) 10:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * An admin will contact you, appeal to him/her. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

ACC tool access request approved
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you are identified to the Wikimedia Foundation and approved your request.

You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarise yourself with the process.

Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.

Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! FastLizard4 (talk•contribs) 06:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Krishna Chaitanya Velaga; this is a reminder that you are required to subscribe to the ACC mailing list before handling any account requests. You have handled several requests already, but you have not yet subscribed.  If you do not subscribe before handling further requests, your access to ACC may be removed.  Also, is there some reason why you have request 186793 reserved even though you don't seem to be doing anything with it?  You may wish to review the ACC guide on the subject of request reservations.  Thanks,  FastLizard4  (talk•contribs) 12:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that. Subscribed to the list and also broke the unexpectedly reserved request. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:PradeepKumar308. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 22:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Closing RfDs
Hi. Re this edit, to close an RfD you need to do more than just editing the redirect. You also have to put header and footer tags on the RfD discussion, and Old RfD on the talk page of the redirect. How to do it is explained at Redirects for discussion/Administrator instructions. On the RfD page there are links for keep/retarget/delete beside the redirect, which help by filling in an appropriate edit summary when you click them.

I have already done this for Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 26 - I was surprised to find the redirect already retargetted - but I am letting you know for next time. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Will note that. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Page: M Ross Perkins (Singer)
Hi, you recently accepted my page submission for "M Ross Perkins (singer)", however the main article title is incorrect. It should read "M Ross Perkins", not "Ross Perkins". Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by W1nds0ck (talk • contribs) 23:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Primefac (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Miramar?
Hey. Did you ever rec'v Miramar access? Lingzhi &diams; (talk) 21:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I use it. Any problem? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I was just following up because I had screwed it up earlier. Checking to see if everything is OK. Happy editing... Lingzhi &diams; (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Portillo
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Portillo. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

2nd West Virginia Cavalry
Thank you for all your work reviewing the 2nd West Virginia Volunteer Cavalry Regiment. It is a long article, and I can be difficult, but you were very patient! I learned a lot, and plan to upgrade two of my other military articles. Cheers! TwoScars (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking forward for more contributions from you. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Sam Manekshaw
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Operation Trident (1971)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Operation Trident (1971) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=9 December 2016}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Operation Python
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Operation Python has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Are you sure the edit was complete? I still find the c/e notice on the page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * My mistake! I've removed it. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piru Singh
The article Piru Singh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Piru Singh for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Ishaq Dar
Krishna, do you think this article could achieve a GA status? --Saqib (talk) 16:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The article looks good, but I am not good at political biographies. I can help you with military history related ones, if needed. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

 * I've replied again.  —   Gestrid  ( talk ) 00:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Trident (1971)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Trident (1971) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

14:51:54, 5 December 2016 review of submission by 2600:1010:B008:1E21:4C0C:26D4:DE70:D124
can you help me edit this page so it can be approved?

We are a nonprofit
 * I am not good at these type of articles. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Somnath Sharma
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Somnath Sharma has been completed.

I tried to check the citation for Sharma's PVC medal but discovered that the link you cited is now a "dead link". I hope you can find another citation to replace the one you used.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017
On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.

For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
 * First place – $200
 * Second & Third place – $50 each
 * Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.

Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address. After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.

The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are, , and.

Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup Review
Hey! I was just checking your reviews where I noticed that you failed an article, and when I check reviews (pass or fail) I tend to use Earwig's Copyvio Detector to see if articles are plagarized. In this case, the article Qamar Javed Bajwa was 80% plagarized from one source. I gave points to your review, but just for future reference, be sure to use the copyvio tool to make sure there isn't plagarism. Thanks! Mr WooHoo (T  • C''' ) 01:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rama Raghoba Rane
The article Rama Raghoba Rane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rama Raghoba Rane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abortion-rights movements
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion-rights movements. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Field Marshall (India)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Field Marshall (India) has been completed. Several URLs still need to be archived.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Param Vir Chakra
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Param Vir Chakra has been completed bu user CoolieCoolster and myself.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Sam Manekshaw
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sam Manekshaw has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Commenting at AfD
Hello. I noticed that you nominated an article for deletion (Articles for deletion/Singapore Tamils). As the nominator, it is usually beneficial if you also discuss and explain your rationale and maybe engage with the participants in discussion. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AKrishna_Chaitanya_Velaga enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 10:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thanks for that. Will make the best out of it. I am a bit confused, what is this "trusted user" tag? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Cold War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cold War. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Sinking Creek Raid
Hello Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. Thank you for reviewing Sinking Creek Raid. Hopefully, I have learned from the 2nd West Virginia Volunteer Cavalry Regiment and this article will be easier for all. A question about the last two images: Do you think the Medal of Honor image and the Powell image should replace each other (put Powell where the Medal is, and put the Medal where Powell is)? TwoScars (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

4th GA Cup - Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for INS Vikrant (R11)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Trident (1971)
The article Operation Trident (1971) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Trident (1971) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

2016 Year in Review

 * Thank You Tom. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Python
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Python you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

If you have time...
Krishna hi :) If you have time, can you take a quick look at Featured list candidates. I've already addressed various queries of Rambling Man. It'll be nice to have your views too there. Thanks. Lourdes  14:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Field marshal (India)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Field marshal (India) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Field marshal (India)
The article Field marshal (India) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Field marshal (India) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Military History Newcomer of the Year

 * Congratulations! Zawed (talk) 10:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Belated congrats from me too, Krishna! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bernie or Bust
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie or Bust. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Rama Raghoba Rane
 Schwede 66  00:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Piru Singh
 Schwede 66  00:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiCup
I see you have added seven GA reviews to your submissions page, but some of them are not eligible for this year's WikiCup because you did a substantial part of the review during 2016, before the WikiCup started. Please see this discussion on GA reviews on the WikiCup talk page. For this reason, as a WikiCup judge, I am removing your submissions for Second_Battle_of_Bapaume, Jean-Baptiste_Piron, and Chinese_cruiser_Chaoyong and accepting the other four submissions. Although two of these were taken up by you in December, the actual reviewing appears to have taken place in January. They are good reviews by the way! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Field marshal (India)
The article Field marshal (India) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Field marshal (India) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Python
The article Operation Python you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Python for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jadunath Singh
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jadunath Singh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply
I advise you to be more familiar with the topic of the Holocaust in Serbia before posting any warning or advice on my talkage. Thank you!--bez potpisa (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Cecil Harris GA Review
Ahoy, just checking in to make sure you haven't forgotten about reviewing Cecil E. Harris for GA. I know you review many articles and have recently been involved in that process (including distractions by troll users on one of the pages you were reviewing), but it's been about a week now without any headway. My article is long so I'll be patient while you conduct your review. Based on your previous reviews and your experience with Wikipedia I have confidence you'll help improve the article. Best, Finktron (talk) 00:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, will get to you within a day or two. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 15:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participate
Hello Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?

Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?
 * Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
 * An editor must have 500+ edits.
 * Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here. Regards. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kodandera M. Cariappa
The article Kodandera M. Cariappa you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kodandera M. Cariappa for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eurodac
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eurodac. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Somnath Sharma
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Somnath Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jadunath Singh
The article Jadunath Singh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jadunath Singh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

4th GA Cup - Round 3
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Param Vir Chakra
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Param Vir Chakra you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 00:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Yehudi lights
Hi, I can see you're busy (and suspect a lot of activity "in real life" too), but would be glad if we could continue with this GAN! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry chap, will take care of that soon. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 10:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

A class
Hello. You have four nominations open at the moment on WP:MHACR, some of which have outstanding comments from reviewers. I see you responded earlier to the comments on the list of frigates; I had intended to ask you to revisit that. I've un-transcluded Kodandera M. Cariappa for the time being. Please could you address the outstanding reviews first, and preferably wait for the reviewers to revisit in case they have more comments, before putting Cariappa back or nominating any more articles? Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  15:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand that. Will get to the comments soon, got a bit busy. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can see you've got a lot on your plate! For what it's worth, it looks like the list of frigates and INS Vikrant are close to promotion—if you address the comments on them and the reviewers return to support, then both would have the requisite three supports. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Qamar Javed Bajwa
Hello Krishna, Sorry to bring this up again but I'm curious to know if this article can be re-assessed for GA nomination ? At Talk:Qamar Javed Bajwa/GA1, you wrote (1) "The Education section is too small and needs considerable expansion." I don't think we're missing anything related to subjects education. (2) "Expansion of career section is also required." I did research and I found we're missing nothing related to his career. (3) "More importantly the article is not stable." Looking the history page, I don't see any substantial information being added recently and no edit warring history on the page so far. (4) "Has lot of issues with the MoS, needs a thorough copy-edit from an experienced copy editor." This can be fixed at no time. Look forward your comment! --Saqib (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry to say, many issues still exist. I strongly suggest a peer review, before renominating the article. Besides, the main issue is stability of the article. Given the subject is the current army chief the article ma edited randomly by any user and even IPs, so the article clearly fails this criteria. Anyway, I suggest a peer review. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 15:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Atrocities in the Congo Free State
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Atrocities in the Congo Free State. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Param Vir Chakra
The article Param Vir Chakra you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Param Vir Chakra for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Field marshal (India) has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Template:Field marshal (India), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  18:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Field marshal (India)
Template:Field marshal (India) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Trident (1971)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Param Vir Chakra
Mifter (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Field marshal (India)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Problems with content
Hello, as you may be aware, I have raised concerns about your editing here. You are free to explain your editing process here, there, or anywhere else, if you wish. MPS1992 (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you want to me to give the explanation for? The article is broad in its coverage, within the context, well referenced per WP:RS, complies with the MoS, so it meets the GA criteria. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. I am not requesting any further explanation from you. MPS1992 (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for this edit which has improved the accuracy of the article. Please could you have another look at the cited source, because currently the article still does not accurately reflect the cited source. If you are not sure why, let me know. MPS1992 (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox song
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox song. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Python
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jadunath Singh
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)