User talk:KDACAPELLA

I encourage you to go to the talk page to make your case, and to answer the arguments that have been put forward objecting to the new lead on the lynching article. Thank you.Skywriter 20:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

..I encourage some research on the structure of hate or extremist groups and their often heterodox interpretations of United States Constitution and laws which disagree or are in variance with the group's opinions, beliefs, or theories.[1] Lynching is not relegated to only the unlawful execution of a victim. Lynching is terrorism and it evolves, like a military or paramilitary campaign, as a gradual process which includes, but is not limited to, the planning, staging, and unlawful execution of an assault, whether it is verbal, physical, or otherwise conveyed in signs of malice that constitute threats of violence involving the intent to commit an unlawful and unjustifiable act that will result in harm to another.KDACAPELLA 21:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

This is all well and good but it is original research, and not permitted on Wikipedia. Unless you can demonstrate a source, the dictionary definition suffices. Have you replied to the points raised on the talk page? That is the relevant arena when there are disputes such as this. The point is to find areas of agreement and identify areas of disagreement. I have stated what I see as areas of agreement and disagreement. That you reverted the definition twice is not acceptable. Thank you.Skywriter 00:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Edited Confederate Flag
Does this compromise work? — BQZip01 — talk 00:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Street Theatre
You seem to be one of the people editing the 'protest' section of this article. How would you feel about moving this section to its own article, say Performance protest, to avoid having an article trying to cover two entirely unrelated subjects? There would of course be a linke from Street theatre to Performance protest. 199.71.183.2 19:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Christian terrorism
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Premeditate listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Premeditate. Since you had some involvement with the Premeditate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)