User talk:KDegioia

Please hep!
@justberry my page "kris degioia" was deleted by Waffen77 and I have no idea why. It says he has been banned from doing anything on Wikipedia So how could he delete my page? I'm so confused, ( I don't even know if this is the right way to contact you ) my page wasn't even finished with all the notable references listed as links! It was just re created by someone (I didn't even know it was taken down by the same Waffen77 to begin with. I'm honestly very confused and I'm hoping you can help me ! Please! 107.3.202.41 (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)kris degioia107.3.202.41 (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging deleting administrator of this page. --JustBerry (talk) 02:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I really don't know what your response means. I feel totally dumb right now for the fact I don't know how any of this works! I'm cited in mark washingtons NFL wikipedia page, and have tons of links (not PR releases but  notable ones) mark wanted me listed as a clickable link from his to mine. Can you help us resolve this bc it's not paid, and it's  not advertising it's just facts. --2601:482:0:81BB:616C:2E50:DD41:D792 (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * kris degioia 2601:482:0:81BB:616C:2E50:DD41:D792 (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the ambiguity. I was simply pinging the administrator who deleted the page you had created to get more insight into their reasoning for doing so. If you visit this page, you should see this line (19:17, January 7, 2017 Mkdw (talk | contribs) deleted page Kris Degioia (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waffen77), which represents an article deletion log entry. --JustBerry (talk) 02:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks I did and saw my cite was deleted after my page was deleted. Mark himself did not deleted it. I looked at the sock Piet page and Waffen77 is banned from doing anything on here (from what I read) @justberry I really need your help bc I never made my Wikipedia page to begin with (as you can tell I do not know how to even write a simple message) then I did not know it was deleted untill mark told me. Then all of a sudden it's back but gets delete bc Someone I don't even know made one that was  identical to the old one? I don't see how that's fair. I can send you sources  that back up my notability. I never even asked for a winkipedia page to begin with and now I'm being bashed for no reason? I don't understand. Thank you.  For your patience and understanding KDegioia (talk) 02:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * kris degioia KDegioia (talk) 02:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

http://www.allncom.com/social-media-making-connections-count/ https://slament.com/2017/01/05/kris-degioia-ceo-wtf-multimedia/ http://www.blogprocess.com/interview-with-kris-degioia-entrepreneur-and-wtf-multimedias-founder/ http://alwaysthebest.org/ http://www.csiawareness.org http://m.digitaljournal.com/pr/2772932 http://m.digitaljournal.com/pr/3191109 http://www.pressreleaserocket.net/leading-digital-marketer-kris-degioia-to-co-host-upcoming-breakthrough-talk-show-the-daily-push/ http://7thspace.com/headlines/524494/kris_degioia_launches_tour_to_raise_awareness_of_how_cyber_stalking_wrecks_lives.html http://www.krisdegioia.com/ http://www.wtfmmcom/


 * OK, let's look at those. We need significant coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of you.
 * http://www.allncom.com/social-media-making-connections-count/ - written by your client. Not independent.
 * https://slament.com/2017/01/05/kris-degioia-ceo-wtf-multimedia/ - Press release written by you. Not reliable or independent.
 * http://www.blogprocess.com/interview-with-kris-degioia-entrepreneur-and-wtf-multimedias-founder/ - interview. Not secondary.
 * http://alwaysthebest.org/ - the home page of a website is not a valid reference.
 * http://www.csiawareness.org - the home page of a website is not a valid reference.
 * http://m.digitaljournal.com/pr/2772932 - press release. Not independent.
 * http://m.digitaljournal.com/pr/3191109 - press release. Not independent.
 * http://www.pressreleaserocket.net/leading-digital-marketer-kris-degioia-to-co-host-upcoming-breakthrough-talk-show-the-daily-push/ - press release. Not independent.
 * http://7thspace.com/headlines/524494/kris_degioia_launches_tour_to_raise_awareness_of_how_cyber_stalking_wrecks_lives.html - appears to be written by you. Not independent.
 * http://www.krisdegioia.com/ - this is your own website. Neither independent nor secondary.
 * http://www.wtfmmcom/ - this is your own website. Neither independent nor secondary.
 * None of those sources constitute significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mark Washington (linebacker), did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JustBerry (talk) 04:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017 - reply to your question to various editors
Hi Kris, I have seen you ask the same question of a few people and it seems to me that you have not understood what has happened or the warnings that you have previously been given about your editing (here). I will try to explain as clearly as I can:
 * The article "Kris Degioia" (which, you should note, is not "your" article - even if it is about you, wikipedia articles are not owned by anyone) was not deleted by Waffen77. It has been deleted three times: the first (9 Oct 2016) by because it was blatantly promotional and wikipedia does not exist to promote people or companies. The second and third times (28 Dec 2016 and 8 January 2017) were by  and were because the article was created by Waffenn77 or another similar user who have been found to be abusing multiple accounts and undertaking undeclared paid editing, which is not allowed on wikipedia.
 * If you are Kris Degioia, then you need to understand a few things. First, you should not be writing about yourself on wikipedia anyway. See here and here. Secondly, wikipedia is not for self-promotion - see here, not matter how 'noble' your cause is.
 * Wikipedia articles will only be allowed if they are about people demonstrated to be notable, and can be verified by reliable, secondary sources, none of which you have yet been able to show as nearly all of the links you have included above are blogs, press releases, or your own websites.
 * If you would like to be a wikipedia editor, then I would suggest you get some experience editing articles that have nothing to do with yourself. If you are only here to promote yourself then you are in the wrong place - see here.
 * Please read the blue links to find out more information about each of these things. I have 'pinged' the two administrators who deleted the article, so they may be able to clarify or explain anything I have missed. Thanks, Melcous (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Of course I have asked as many ppl as possible with this. I am noteworthy and all of the cites I have are noteworthy. I didn't pay anyone to create my page. Thank you for telling me that it was deleted that many times as I did not know that. I realize this is not for advertising or promotion it's about facts. And everything on mine was facts. So just bc someone thinks that facts is "promotion or advertising" my page gets deleted? Someone's opinion is NOT FACTS. And someone flagging it for deletion based off their opinion is the definition of a catch 22. Once again my references and cites are ALL noteworthy and I'm not talking about press releases. KDegioia (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)kris degioiaKDegioia (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging addressee on behalf of User:KDegioia. --JustBerry (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Also when did I ever once say ANYONE "owned" my article. That would be the equvilant of saying "someone owns my life story" I might not speak wikipedia language, but I can tell you I am far from dumb. Lastly, you state I was warned? That may ir may not be true but that does not mean I know or knew about it. Once again thats your opnion not a fact, and dont try to say based off ip address balh blah blah then I woukd know, bc I wouldnt, and I didnt know. I might be many things but im far from a liar!


 * Thanks . Kris, the advice given to people here is usually that if you are noteworthy, someone else will write an article about you eventually. If you really don't want to wait for that, you can always try requesting someone write one here and see if an non-COI editor is willing to do so. But either way, as I said, you should not be writing about yourself. In terms of verifying that you are noteworthy, you may well be, but on this page above you provided links to eleven websites. As far as I can see:
 * 1 is a blog post written by someone you have worked with
 * 2 is a press release
 * 3 is a blog post by someone who interviewed you
 * 4 is a blog noting how good you are at self-promotion
 * 5 is the website of an organisation you founded
 * 6 is a press release
 * 7 is a press release
 * 8 is a press release
 * 9 is your own promotion of your tour on a website that distributes press releases
 * 10 is your personal website
 * 11 won't open for me but I assume from the address is your company's website
 * See here on the fact that articles cannot be based primarily on self-published sources, which all of these are. So hopefully you can see my point that this does not establish your notability. You would need to be providing things like newspaper articles, and other sources that are not directly connected with you (that's what we mean by secondary sources) to do that. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 06:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * PS, I only just saw your last post - please don't take offence, that will not help anything. I didn't call you a liar. My comment about owning articles was because a few times you talked about "my article", which you may have simply meant as "the article about me" but I wanted to point out is not "your article" in any other sense. In terms of warnings, I'm talking about the advice given on the talk page of your previous (now blocked) account, Krisdegioia, about writing about yourself and managing conflicts of interest. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 06:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That pretty much duplicates the analysis I posted in the top section of this article, about the same time you did. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Mkdw  talk 07:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In addition: Involvement with undisclosed paid editing, your original account was blocked and this secondary account has the same problematic issue, sharing your account as mentioned in some of your comments, conflict of interest, repeated disruptive appeals, venue shopping, abusively using multiple accounts and logged out editing. The community has been very patient and gone to incredible lengths to explain the situation but has been met with "I don't hear you". It's clear you cannot constructively edit given all these problems and I suggest you leave the writing to the community. If you are indeed someone notable then there's a chance someone else with the encyclopedia's interests in mind will create an article. Mkdw  talk 08:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)