User talk:KDiver12345

Welcome!
Hello, KDiver12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Adding "character actor" to leads
I'm afraid that your opinions or assessments of their roles don't count on Wikipedia, and unless you find this description in a reliable source (WP:RS), and quote it preferably in the body of the article (see MOS:LEAD), then you will need to revert a lot of your recent changes, please. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Laterthanyouthink. Thank you very much for messaging me and making me aware a bit more about the rules of editing on Wikipedia pages. I apologise that I didn't include a verified source for most of the actors that I changed to character actor. I will revert them back to their original. I appreciate you taking the time to give me advice. I will try and find reliable sources in future if I post. Many thanks, KDiver12345 :-) KDiver12345 (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi again, I reverted all my article edits back to their original and left a reason for each. You're welcome to check out my reverts and let me know if I was correct. Sorry to have left this so long. I didn't get the notification on my phond that I was messaged on here, so thank you. Have a good day. KDiver12345 KDiver12345 (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . No problem at all, and thanks for doing that. I didn't check all of your edits but those I saw looked similar in nature and were obviously not deliberate (vandalism), so I thought it best to let you know rather than plough through reverting them myself. Please don't let this put you off - there's a lot to learn and nobody absorbs it all overnight. We all learn slowly by our mistakes and by picking up tips from more experienced editors (and I'm far from in the top category of those!). If you have questions that need answering as you edit, the Teahouse is a good place to ask. I'll have a quick look at your changes, but I'm sure they're fine. (In general, fyi the citations belong in the body rather than the lead, which is a summary and should be further elaborated in the body.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)