User talk:KGirlTrucker81/Archive 3

Accepting bad edits
Why did you accept this edit here? It was quite obvious vandalism.

Looking back through your talk page it would seem you have been questioned a number of times about accepting bad revisions on articles. If you don't have time to review edits properly, or aren't good at spotting vandalism, maybe accepting revisions isn't for you? -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Per WP:Reviewing, PC reviewers don't take responlitblity regardless what they accept. They added unsourced content and may be vandalism. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 17:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Erm, just to clear up any confusion, you can decline revisions in which vandalism is present through PCR. I've seen a previous discussion here in which someone requested your PCR be revoked. I don't want that to have to happen, but it may well do if this continues. Patient Zerotalk 18:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I already know what is vandalism is and is not but I don't want to get dragged to ANI, that was who requested it but stale for now. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing  19:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I know you do. I am not doubting that. But please, don't accept edits that are obvious vandalism, as it is essentially the same thing as ignoring vandalism when one spots it on an article (and I couldn't ever bring myself to do that). You could well end up at AN/I for this should your accepting of bad faith edits persist. Patient Zerotalk 13:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I came here because of a bad accepted edit as well. You recently accepted three edits on Simon Hopkinson that added a joke about Gavin Free. The entire reason that page is protected is because people keep adding jokes about Gavin Free, so accepting those edits completely undermines the protection. If you're not going to take the time to verify that an edit is not vandalism, then please do not accept the edit. Thanks, Iago Qnsi  (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Adding this one as well, although it's probably a tricky one to spot at first. – Uanfala (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Formatting issues
Formatting issues are never a reason to decline a draft, as you did at Draft:Bharti Sharma Kshitij. If a perfectly valid draft is badly formatted, it should be fixed and accepted, not declined so that the creator (probably unfamiliar with the "proper" way of formatting") has to struggle through the process (and wait of resubmitting). There are a bunch of dropdown decline reasons, and the custom reason should only be used if it really doesn't fit any one of them (or if it breaks multiple decline reasons equally). Cheers, Primefac (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, I thought formatting issues not a vaild reason to decline but thanks for the advice! KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 17:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Azerbaijan at the 2016 IJF World Masters, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Why did you unreviewed the page? KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 21:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Mistake - I thought it was unreviewed.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It's okay, we all make mistakes including me. Keep up the good work! :) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 22:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you very much for what you wrote on my page. I'm not sure to know how everything work. But I will try to be more careful next time. Thank you !

AnhSe (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC) 
 * How sweet of you! :) Thanks! KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 19:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Good evening, Would you mind explaining me why the references I submitted were not reliable ? I'm not sure I understand why. Thank you. :) AnhSe (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Because using social media as sources is mostly no. All information must be cited an reliable source such as a newspaper review or an book reference. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 19:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the explanation ! AnhSe (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you for your patience. AnhSe (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

13:08:08, 13 November 2016 review of submission by Kireadsalot
Hi

Thanks for reviewing my article. I do apologise for posting topic hastily. I am new to contributing. It is my first article. I do not know how to go about.

I also would like to post article on Christchurch Earthquqke.

Contributing to wiki is not the same as Facebook, Whatsapp. I need guidance to begin with. Could you please guide me with initial steps. I will take it from there onwards.

Thank you
 * Your draft has no references ethier, I highly suggest you read WP:Your first article before making further improvements. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 14:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. Will go through the link. Kireadsalot (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

23:44:59, 16 November 2016 review of submission by Hray202
Hello, thank you for reviewing my submission for Kyle Cherek. Can you let me know which sources are not reliable so that I may revise? Again, thanks! Hray202 (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In my reviewer comment, YouTube is not an reilable source which you listed here. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 07:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Tasty cookies!
Thanks for the welcome KGirlTrucker81! New to the wiki editing, lot to learn. :) JemSt0ne16 (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 02:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Ronald McDonald
There is already a discussion already started on the talk page about it. Check it out. 174.192.17.245 (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, I've commented on the discussion saying that will be consensus against it. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 22:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC
Hi. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Request on 00:42:23, 24 November 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by JohnTheofilaktidis
The hardest thing to explain about a Business Continuity Plan is Why you don&#39;t have one (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

hi KGirlTrucker81! I received your message regarding the article I was trying to post and I am struggling to figure out why it does not meet the requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia? I modeled my article based on OAEM's sister group IAEM (International Assocaition of Emergency Managers) and tried to keep the article short and factual. Can you please help me understand what I need to do to ensure that my article is complaint?

Regards,

John The hardest thing to explain about a Business Continuity Plan is Why you don&#39;t have one (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I declined your submission for the following reasons: 1. It doesn't meet WP:NCORP. 2. Your draft has no references which required to establish notability through reliable sources. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 01:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Ruff (operating system) AfD
Hey, just so you know, I started an AfD for Ruff (operating system). I saw you patrolled the page, so I figure maybe you saw something that I'm missing, and you can come defend it. Cheers, Iago Qnsi  (talk) 16:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying me for an AFD that I may participate in but any notifications will be perfectly fine. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 16:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Page Declined - Proctor - Nov 24, 2016
Hi KGirlTrucker81! I received your message re my article being declined. I'm new to this and would like to try again if you can let me know why it was declined and what I need to fix to make it acceptable. Thank you for your help. Clproctor (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your submission is a copyright violation and it will be deleted. Next time, please write your draft in your own words. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 22:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi KGirlTrucker81! Thank you for your response. I'm not sure what copy is in copyright violation. All of the copy on the page was actually written by me. I copy and pasted it from a word file that I wrote. Would you be able to be more specific about what content you feel is in copyright violation? Thanks again for your help. Clproctor (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In Earwig's Copyvio Detector, I have seen multiple copy-pastes from other websites. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 01:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

The first paragraph of copy on the page is just my bio which I have given out to other companies that have hired me to help coach their agents. Is it possible this is what is being picked up? It's my bio, written by me, but other companies may have put this copy on their sites. It does originate from me though as it is my personal bio. What would you suggest? Clproctor (talk) 01:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Take a look at WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPYPASTE for more. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 01:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

0 (key) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 0 (key). Since you had some involvement with the 0 (key) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI
You are welcome to remove comments from your own talk page, but please do not remove posts from other editors at ANI. Frivolous claims will be declined/rejected/BOOMERANGed in due time, and at the very least the editor making the claim should be responded to rather than ignored entirely. Primefac (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * No, this is an obvious troll here, who is adding unsourced content who is an IP. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 21:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * First, not all IPs are trolls, and second - the content has been sourced. This particular case is obviously an exception to the general rule. You're welcome to continue reverting what you feel is vandalism, but my point was not about the edit war; it was about removing other people's posts (which has now been brought up by someone else at the ANI thread. Primefac (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Challange
Thanks for Boomerang (Turkey) Would you like to add your article to the list in The 1000 Challenge (Turkey). Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I've only accepted your AFC submission but I may do it. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 18:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

18:04:38, 27 November 2016 review of submission by Joseph-Winklepicker
Hi,

I just submitted my first contribution which was declined at the first attempt (I hope I will get the hang of it) and am just seeking some clarification, so as not to keep needlessly submitting my article for review, which I imagine may become annoying for reviewers/moderators.

I've done a brief edit and removed/changed a link that was from a non reputable source and I've also added another section. I just wanted to check if I'd need to refine my sources further or if my Facebook faux pas was the main reason for declining. If re-submitting is the way I find out, then I am happy to do so. I figure my ego can take a few more declined notifications before I cry a river. If at first you don't succeed, try and try again...

Thanks for your time and I look forward to your reply. Joseph-Winklepicker (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Facebook is not an reliable source because using social media as sources is mostly no. You've still got independent third-party sources but it must not have interviews, press releases etc. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 18:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

21:52:19, 27 November 2016 review of submission by Michaelhurwicz
On Nov. 7. I submitted "The Climate Monologues". (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Climate_Monologues) It was rejected because a blog was used as a reference. I have eliminated that reference. I am hoping and assuming that all the other references are acceptable. Therefore, I'm hoping this article can now be accepted.

Michael Hurwicz (talk) 21:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 22:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

An early cracker
A BIG THANK YOU for correcting the sURPRISE PACKAGE (BAND) into a normally capitalized named article. In return I'm letting you know that being a partner affected to AS I support Autism Awareness, although it is not always a pleasury task. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 13:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

RfC: Userspace protection
Hey KGirlTrucker. I'm contacting you to follow-up on the RfC on userspace protection that you participated in. After a discussion at, it looks like a filter is a better approach to implementing these changes. We're developing some language for a message that editors will see when the filter is triggered. Comments and suggestions on this message are welcome at the talk page. Take care, I JethroBT drop me a line 16:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Hirschtick
Dear KGirlTrucker81,

Thank you very much for reviewing of my first article about Jon Hirschtick and for your confirmation that it is good enough for Wikipedia! (you accepted it three days ago)

Unfortunatelly it is being considered for deletion. Could you please confirm that my plan to keep the article is good?

I am going to do this:
 * 1) Add information about awards of Jon Hirschtick to show his notability.
 * 2) Reduce number of sources (i.e. keep only links on Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Forbes and may be Bloomberg, but delete all other not so cool sources) to fix the reason "the sources are not equally convincing" (do you see other ways to fix this kind of issue?).

What else you'd recommend me to do in this case? (I am reading WP:XFD, WP:HELPAFD, WP:GOODARG, WP:ARS now, but it is not completely clear for me what is better to do)

Thank you very much! Ilya.lichman (talk) 10:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * You can feel free to share your thoughts and !vote (ex: Delete or Keep) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 13:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * KGirlTrucker81, thank you for your quick answer! Yes, I am going to try to explain why Keep is right decision. But I want to improve the article before it. So I ask you for your opinion about two ideas (to add information about awards and to remove all references except Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Forbes and may be Bloomberg). What do you think about it? Will it be helpful? Thank you again! Ilya.lichman (talk) 13:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * personally, I would say, go vote to keep it, if you feel he's notable enough, and list the awards he has won when explaining your reasoning to keep the article. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  13:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer! I will be really happy to know your opinion about my reasoning to keep the article, and your opinion about notability of Jon Hirschtick. Thank you again! Ilya.lichman (talk)
 * If I'm not mistaken, I've seen the documentary, but that wouldn't necessarily qualify him for notability by itself. But, I honestly don't know enough about him to make a proper judgement. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  16:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * ,, Thank you for your ideas! I've rewritten the introduction of the article to prove that Jon Hirschtick is notable enough. Could you please review/criticize it? Thank you! Ilya.lichman (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, since reviewing the article I think he's notable enough. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 06:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I worked on the lede section somewhat. Formatted into a somewhat prose style. Also to know that when adding a reference, it needs to be after the period at the end of a sentence, not before. I took care of that for you. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  08:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for these corrections and for the explanation! I'll try to be more accurate with punctuation. Also I have an idea about proving of notability of Jon Hirschtick. He is one of recipients of the CAD Society’s Leadership Award, and other recipients of this award include PLM decision-makers and CEOs such as Autodesk’s Carl Bass, and Dassault Systèmes’ Bernard Charles, as well as 3D Systems's Ping Fu. All of them are in Wikipedia, because they changed the world, as Jon Hirschtick. The only difference is that Hirschtick done it twice. Is it reasanoble? What do you think about it? Ilya.lichman (talk) 12:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * well, like I said, I don't know enough about him or the award to make that call. Now, if this was an NFL player, that would be a different story. lol (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  12:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Jesse Eisenberg
Hi there! I notice that you have nominated this article for GA, which I would have worked on at some point. I wanted to take it up for review but I saw that you have never contributed to the article (except where you reverted a vandal). Please do some work and then nominate it; it is not in very bad shape, but is certainly not ready for GA in my view. The article has a lot of trivial information. I notice absolutely no reviews of his work and the media image section is missing, which I think should be added, discussing what the media thinks of his personality and work. References are not properly formatted and WP:SHOUTING is very frequent. And it goes on.

Anyway, I hope that you take my suggestions into consideration. Cheers! – FrB.TG (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * OK :) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 20:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for patrolling articles. It is suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created, as you did at Society of Chartered Financial Analysts of the United Kingdom. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -- samtar talk or stalk 13:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I know, but sometimes it can be deleted by other admins fastly and hasty is not required to do this. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This isn't a competition. If you leave a page for half an hour and someone else deletes it, who cares? 's point was that you should wait and see if a page will be developed. I got pissed off when I created a page and had it tagged while I was in the process of adding more content, and I'm an experienced editor. Imagine how it would feel as a relatively new editor. Primefac (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Only clear non-notable subjects such as this one: "Caroline Douglas is a awesome and funny person" and usually issue an or  to show Wikipedia is not Facebook or LinkedIn. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  16:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Once again your comments are completely illogical and irrelevant to what has previously been said. Please, listen to what these two have to say, as experienced editors. Patient Zerotalk 20:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Tactical Edge, Inc.
Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for reviewing my article about Tactical Edge, Inc. However, while my talk page says that the article has been created, it does not appear that it was actually created. I can't find any evidence of the article anywhere. I'm new to Wikipedia editing, so perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place? You accepted the article at 20:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC). Would appreciate any help you can provide in getting the article visible. Thanks. Garberinotalk
 * , it appears that shortly after being accepted, your draft was PRODded and subsequently deleted on 14 November 2016. I'm rather surprised that you did not receive notification of the PROD tags being placed on the page. was the one who deleted the page, so you should talk to them about possibly undeleting the article. Primefac (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 17:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Removing comments from other user's talk pages
Please don't remove comments from other user's talk pages. Per WP:OWNTALK, user talk pages are subject to thegeneral userpage guidelines on handling inappropriate content, which say that content should only be removed from another user's user space if it is something that must be addressed urgently ("for example, unambiguous copyright, attack, defamation, or BLP reasons, etc."). Comments that are simply offtopic, not formatted correctly, misplaced, etc. should be left up to the talk page owner to remove. In the case of my talk page, the comment you removed was clearly an attempt by an inexperienced user to call my attention to what they perceived to be an error in a Wikipedia article. While they may or may not be correct, and the comment wasn't formatted per the usual Wikipedia guidelines, a content dispute is an appropriate thing to be on a user's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 18:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake, I thought it was vandalism. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 12:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

NPR
Hi. When reviewing new pages, please consider adding categories where none exist. It only takes a few moments. There is an excellent tool displayed on every page that does most of the work for you. It's called HotCat. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I may add cats on BLPs and other articles and if necessary. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 12:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Wow
The edit I made on Carlos Gomez was not vandalism. I made the photo size to 2,000 but changed it back with in 5 seconds. Seriously? That is not vandalism now get a clue. 75.87.162.172 (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your edit seems vandalism because altering the pixel size into a larger size could've been vandalism. So, please edit constrictively. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 01:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Toufique Ahmed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 23:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * looks like you may have made a mistake here... -- samtar talk or stalk 23:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * repinging because I messed that ping up -- samtar talk or stalk 23:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * And he just templated me! Please read my talk header. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 23:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm more interested as to how this came about - whereas your wishes to not be templated should be taken into consideration, I'm afraid you can't stop editors using them :( -- samtar talk or stalk 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , without seeing how the page was created, my guess is KGirl moved the page at some point. I've had a fair number of "creations" simply due to the fact that I moved a page and its creation got credited to me. Primefac (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * that was my first thought, however it only has two revisions - the creation by Toufiquekhans and then the tag by KGirl.. It's no big deal, I just want to make sure MordeKyle isn't patrolling things a little two quick and being a bit click happy! --  samtar talk or stalk 00:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It was a mistake, it was supposed to be a Hasty notice for an A7 after only a few minutes after article creation.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 00:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi (what are the issues)
Hi you just reviewed and rejected my sandbox .....plz help me out with the issues and how I can fix it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nabeelgm/sandbox

Thanks..... ∞😃 Nabeelgm 😃∞
 * Nabeelgm (talk • contribs) Nabeel Gm 03:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC) Nabeel Gm 03:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, everything seems to be an test but if you want to write an article, please get started on it. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 03:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Sandwich testing, KGirlTrucker81.

Unfortunately Lourdes has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Wrong CSD template; it's not an organized event"

To reply, leave a comment on Lourdes's talk page.

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

Your Review in May 18
Hello, i just wanted to inform you that the date regarding the birth of Johannes Glauber was added by the ip address itself in the main article without any conclusive source for that addition.I would request you to Unaccept that revision or delete that entry altogether.Thanks.-- Param Mudgal talk? 13:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 13:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you.-- Param Mudgal talk? 13:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Zamzam -- request for help
hi, thank you for reviewing zamzam_ship. I am a newbie and would like to request your help with the disambiguation page for zamzam. Right now, searching on zamzam leads to the disambiguation page (including links to well, ship, party, and soft drink). I think searching on zamzam should redirect straight to the zamzam well page, and then all the other pages should be offered on the disambiguation page. It is not clear to me how to make a search redirect to a single page by default. Can you help me fix this please? thank you. Lcb03 (talk) 16:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)lcb03
 * Well, disambiguation pages are entries at the same word (like "do you mean") etc. You can add Zamzam (ship) to the dab page with a short description of the subject. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I must not be explaining the problem clearly. Let me try again.   When you search wikipedia for the word "spoon,"  it takes you directly to the "spoon_utensil" page, and then that page offers links to the spoon disambiguation page.    In contrast, when you search wikipedia for the word "zamzam,"  it takes you directly to the zamzam disambiguation page.   I think searching on zamzam should take the user directly to the zamzam_well page, and then that page should offer links to the disambiguation page and the other pages (on ship, party, and softdrink).Lcb03 (talk) 16:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what dab and redirect notice templates used to do. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, so I think we have the same understanding of what should happen. I tried to use the templates correctly on the zamzam page but clearly failed.  I can't figure out how to make the zamzam search act like the spoons search.  So I'm hoping that with your expertise you can help fix it so it works the way it should. Let me know if I should ask elsewhere.  Thanks.Lcb03 (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The usage of the template are like this: If you want more questions, visit the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  17:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Request on 01:05:59, 13 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Littlebigadventure
Hi KGirlTrucker81,

Many thanks for your time on my short work.

I could not locate the 'resubmit' button anywhere after editing my draft today so am wondering if you can please shed some light.

Cheers,

Littlebigadventure (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Have you submitted your draft for review yet? Just put at the top when your finished. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  12:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

@KGirlTrucker81, hello i have done all that you had asked me to do...the only problem am having is how to code an image into the Iyle, infobox. please go and check it out and also show me how to code an image thanks.KGirlTrucker81

request for creating Marwa Al Mamari
Hi KGirlTrucker81 I'm trying to create an article about Marwa Al Mamari but you SpeedDeleted it.

Please advice with the exact reasons and if by any chance you can create it and I can provide you with all the documents and requirements.

Your assistance is highly appreciated.

thanksFan77777 (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This person is non-notable and no independent third-party sources such as a news review. Think if a person is mentioned by a news source. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 13:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I have uploaded one of the newspapers Al Khaleej Newspaper article about her, and there are more. please check my uploads, however, the articles are all written in Arabic, but i am uploading more. Al khaleej Newspaper is a very well known national newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, Dubai, Sharjah, and they did identify her and note her as the Editor in Chief of Salfa Electronic Magazine, salfa.co Please adviceFan77777 (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I have uploaded the newspapers to the article and added the references, please check. Thanks Fan77777 (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The page has now been deleted by admin, so next time create an draft version. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 19:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Arijit Singh
The info about the song of Kabil.. That is Mujhe Kehne De zara is inappropriate...!! If it's not! Please let me know!! As this song is yet not released or officially not declined as the part of the film!! Nishant Saini (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * We don't know about your views on the songs as long you cite sources to confirm it. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hi,how do i get to put links on a page that i have created,i am finding my pages getting deleted because of this Wangina (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, because look at your talk page, two CSD notices and one being a copyright violation. I'll suggest you create an article via the AFC process. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 13:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Ricardo Semprun.
I saw you patrolled this article. Note that Ricardo Semprun without the punctuation has been salted. Is there a reason you didn't try to move the article to Ricardo Semprun before marking it patrolled? Oftentimes socks will pull stunts like this to circumvent the title blacklist. See also Sockpuppet investigations/Gstigler. Please don't patrol a suspiciously-titled page like this one again without doing a little digging first. Sro23 (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe I didn't move this one either. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 12:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You should always try to move a page to its best title (in this case, removing an unnecessary period). Primefac (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

14:53:15, 16 December 2016 review of submission by Namik Paul
Hi wondering why the update is declined? do you guys need more articles of of news paper? i didn't get why the information is not verifiable? what kind information you need to verify it. Pls help thanks
 * Your actual submission contains unreliable sources(Blogs, interviews, social media, IMDB etc.) which is not acceptable. See WP:RS for more information. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 15:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk 16:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:ATMIA - ATM Industry Association (22 Dec 2016)
Hello

In other to address "notability" issues I have a) added sources specifically dealing with ATMIA rather than quoting once / one sentence in the article; b) diversified sources by adding others than ATMmarketplace and Finextra ; c) removed previous bulleted lists; c) reduced number of sources in half (from 80+ to 38)

Look forward to hearing from you in due course, season's greetings

Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I declined your submission again because some words are too peacocky. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 18:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Sources Question
What are good sources to establish notability for new actors and politicians?Capolitico (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Such as major news reviews, journals, and books. See WP:RS for more information. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 22:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

And IMDB isn't a good source for movies or actors?Capolitico (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Mostly it's an unreliable source. See also Citing IMDb. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 02:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

03:03:28, 23 December 2016 review of submission by Verelitoradzeebi
Hi,

I have resubmitted the article in English. I also have it in Georgian and would like to add after the initial approval from you of the English version. Let me know how I can help in this process. This is the tragic story of my family in Tbilisi Georgia that has a lot of information in it.

lookinging forward to hearing from you! Thank you! (Verelitoradzeebi (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)).
 * I declined your submission again because it's not written in neutral tone, and possibly fails WP:GNG. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:ATMIA - ATM Industry Association (23 Dec 2016)
Hello

Many thanks for the prompt response and comments. I have endeavored to make the text more neutral.

Look forward to hearing from you and Happy holidays!!

Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ and now moved to mainspace. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 13:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Bot
Hi @User:KGirlTrucker81 regarding your message on my talk page about Hello Bot, I was wondering did I use A1 hastily ? FIT<b style="color:orange">INDIA</b>&#160;<b style="color:red">(talk)</b></i> 19:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, within 4 minutes of creation and you've just bitten a newbie. Please review WP:NPPNICE. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 19:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * am always nice to newbies and I have read WP:NPPNICE :) Thank you <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">FIT</b><b style="color:orange">INDIA</b>&#160;<b style="color:red">(talk)</b></i> 20:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 20:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi The page you tagged for speedy Devil shopee looks more like a G11 to me and its a newbie and its under 5 minutes :) <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">FIT</b><b style="color:orange">INDIA</b>&#160;<b style="color:red">(talk)</b></i> 15:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's only a suggestion when I do A7 speedies but I still wait ten minutes if this clearly meets A1 or A3. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 15:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects
In the future, please take more time to look at proposed redirects at Articles for creation/Redirects. I just accepted five redirects you rejected, all of which were listed as alternative names in the target article's infobox or lede or were simple rephrasings of the proposed target article's name (e.g. Sunday Night Football on ESPN vs ESPN Sunday Night Football). These are all valid redirects which should be accepted unless there's some pressing reason not to (e.g. multiple shows of that name). Thanks, and hope the holiday season is going well for you. Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * OK :) KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 18:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

ATMIA orphan tag (24 Dec 2016)
Hello Thanks for the additional edits. Rearding the orphan tag to the new contribution, ATM Industry Association is referenced in the following Wiki pages:

cash machine / Automated Teller Machine (twice) Windows XP (which corroborates footnote 8 in the current ATMIA article page) KAL Software MegaLink Oberthur Cash Protection

All these were referenced back in the "See also" section of the ATMIA. I also added the ref back (ie "[[") to these but not showing when I search Wiki or using Google (for ATMIA). In any case, this is a minor technical issue and I do believe the "orphan" tag is unwarranted.

Thanks Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I see a bunch of redlinks which also a orphan too. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 12:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * CIM2014, it is indeed no longer an orphan, so I've removed the tag. Primefac (talk) 16:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Adding the since I messed it up earlier Primefac (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you! CIM2014 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Request on 19:15:04, 24 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Fabulatuaest
Removed link to blog that provided archive of newspaper article; added citation to newspaper article.

Fabulatuaest (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Now you can resubmit for review which I'm happy to accept it. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 19:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Request on 03:41:05, 25 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Peterb1234
Peterb1234 (talk) 03:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your feedback on the article Williamsburg Independent Film Festival. More sources have been added hopefully providing notability and verifiable back up. We are great admires of the dedication and importance of the work you do on Wikipedia's behalf, and would be honored to be included. I hope given the Holiday spirit - maybe we can be allowed to continue the process. Signed peterb1234
 * Please place at the top when your finished. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  15:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: M G Leonard
Hello KGirlTrucker81. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of M G Leonard, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The previous AFD was delete for an "As yet unpublished children's author." this article may be about the same subject but is not "substantially identical".''' Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  14:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Re: rejection of Draft:List_of_prohibited_activities_in_the_United_States
Hello, "List of..." articles on Wikipedia often have few or no outside sources, because they summarize many other Wikipedia articles. For example, here are three "List of..." articles with 0-1 outside sources: Also, topics like abortion, child porn, and prostitution are obviously notable. Please reconsider your rejection. Thank you 96.241.172.86 (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * List_of_colors_(compact)
 * List_of_currencies
 * List_of_lakes
 * One source don't have automatic inherited notability. You need more references rather just the source itself. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for commenting about draft pseudo-pseudogenes.
However,realize that this is a VERY new concept and I cited the FIRST paper that coined the term, less than 2 months ago! I'm going to add one more reference soon, and I intend to keep updating the article, but what I've got is just about state of the art. Thanks again for resding this, as I am a newbie and this is my first attempt at using "talk". Dennis Drdfp (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, declined your submission because there's no secondary sources such as major news reviews. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  18:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Dr Fekadu Fullas
Yet more copyvio by this editor, this time from here. Doug Weller talk 14:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 14:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

16:59:15, 28 December 2016 review of submission by Msbitinkov
Hi, just wanted to check why the submission was declined. The majority of proofs in this case are the pictures, I have added links to them including those on FMD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msbitinkov (talk • contribs) 16:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , please read The Golden Rule; your draft is currently failing the first (and most important) point - there is simply no significant coverage of Inga Barkovska. The galleries may "prove" that she had per pictures taken, but we need words on the page to say who she is and why she's notable. See WP:YFA for more information about improving the page. Primefac (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Lzzjsd (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC) G'day mate, I suggested the term "Surrogate Friendship" on the Friendship page and it has been reverted. Any good reason? I think this new section is rather important because the "friendship" term has now become the "function" on social sites and the activity to how things up.. I would appreciate your giving reasons for such decision. Thanks Lzzjsd (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You forgot to cite a source when adding a new section. If you need help on referencing, see WP:Referencing for beginners. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 12:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Review of submission Draft:SAP_Web_IDE
Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for reviewing the article on SAP Web IDE. I saw that the reject reason was regarding information sources. Following yours and others reviews I improved it, I used as many independent (non-SAP) sources as possible. I used "Enterprise IT World", "CIO", "insideSAP", "TechTarget", "Forbes" and more. I'd appreciate if you can let me know how I can make this article better and published :-). Raz.korn (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, declined your submission again because it still doesn't have independent third-party sources rather than press releases. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing  15:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks again for reviewing the article on SAP Web IDE. I made the corrections you suggested, which should resolve the issue. Now I have articles from "Computer Weekly", "Forrester Research" and other truly independent and reliable sources. I believe these sources make the case that SAP Web IDE is significant. I'd appreciate if you can approve the article. Raz.korn (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You have not resubmitted your draft for re-review yet. Click on the "resubmit" button to proceed. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  12:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi KGirlTrucker81, I apologize. I had the notion that I should consult/talk to you in order to make sure the new draft answers your rejection before re-submitting. I clicked the "resubmit" button. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raz.korn (talk • contribs) 14:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I declined your submission again because it still has PR reviews which are unreliable sources. I highly suggest you read Your first article before making further improvements. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... Educational Service Wrokers Ok I understand why you are saying it is copyright, because you use this tool https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Educational_Service_Workers&url=&oldid=757416192 and because I rely heavily on that article it said an above 70% chance copyright infringement but if you look closely I quote and cite everything. Please remove the tag? Rebekahalnablack (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You can contest the CSD by clicking the button that says "Contest this speedy deletion", but please don't remove it. Let the admins decide whether delete it or not. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 16:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

17:36:48, 1 January 2017 review of submission by Daniela-S
Dear KGirlTrucker81, Thank you for your amazingly quick response to the wiki page I'm trying to create for my friend Daniela Sieff. I've never done one before. I've read the recommended pages and have tried to make changes to the original submission, removing links to bitly.com and replacing them with ones to YouTube, added references containing links to Daniela's personal webpage, to Routledge's page advertising her book, plus internal links to other wiki pages. I'm still getting error messages, so am clearly doing something(s) wrong. Sorry to be a pest on New Years Day, but I'd appreciate some pointers to where exactly I'm going wrong. all best wishes for the New Year, Peter
 * I declined your submission again because this still contains interviews and other unreliable sources. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse and ask a question. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 17:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Labdoo article
Hello KGirlTrucker81,

thank you for your help on the Labdoo article. I don't understand why you deleted the "How it works part". Although the title may not be very good, this part did explain what Labdoo is about and how the labdoo donation, sanitizing process works.

" 20:13, 31 December 2016‎ KGirlTrucker81 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (8,767 bytes) (-4,322)‎ . . (WP:NOTHOWTO) (undo | thank)"

Could you please explain why you deleted it?

Thanks

Best Regards and a happy new year. --AoifeJB (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In the edit summary, this is NOT content(the one I put the link in) and you should be able to click the link for the reason why I deleted this. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 19:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

BLP PROD on Erasma Arellano
I've undone your placement of a WP:BLPROD on Erasma Arellano. The article had a reference - it may not have been an inline link, but it had a section marked "Reference" that list the title, publishing year, and publisher for a book. If you have checked that book and found that it has no reference to the subject of the article, let me know and I'll restore the PROD. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The article is now at AFD after you removed the BLPPORD. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  06:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So I see. Did you actually read the article that you've repeatedly try to have deleted? Because half of it is a Reference section, which shows you a source. You don't seem to have done WP:BEFORE, as a Google search would've shown you that the subject is a medal-winner. Then you mark it for deletion discussion as if they were an actor or filmmaker, rather than an athlete. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I searched it on Google, and no independent third party sources are present. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  07:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Really? Your Google didn't find him mentioned in lists of medalists at the 1958 Asian Games? Because mine did. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, sup of the mouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  07:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Mary Barkworth
Hello, I just created Mary Barkworth. I'm sorry, but this is the best I can do given the limited sources available on the internet. I think the information from the linkedIn page is why you posted the unreliable template. I think the information there is rather harmless and was created by ms. Barkworth herself. If you want to delete the article, please be my guest. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I had this article quickly removed now. Thank you for your valuable contibution. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Request on 01:42:35, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Peononon
Peononon (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear KGirlTrucker81, I added references for the submission, which should resolve the issue. Basil McGuckin was my Grandfather, though he died 14 years before I was born. It seemed that he was one of the few Members of the second Northern Ireland Parliament that had now follow-up information. So I wanted to add some.
 * Now, feel free to resubmit for re-review. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  12:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

22:16:18, 4 January 2017 review of submission by 192.180.232.238
Hi there. After multiple attempts to submit Elgin's page for acceptance I've continued to be declined due to the references used - when clearly he's a notable person within not only his industry of hair, but entertainment as well. What can I do to ensure this will eventually be approved? I understand some of the references are name drops (used to verify details mentioned in the text), but they seem noteworthy and to be from credible sources. Individuals and entities accosted with (including those who have studied under Elgin) have wikipedia pages, yet he can't seem to get one! Any of your help would be greatly appreciated.
 * Please read the golden rule. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing  12:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

there seem to be some persistent ones encountered
Not sure that they are reading messages, deliberately ignoring or what... creating one liner blps with links only but no refs... gah JarrahTree 13:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is an sock of which I filed an SPI report on that one.  KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * actually I think its the same every day - thanks for your reply - cheers JarrahTree 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

My recents
Think it should speak for itself - leave it to your judgement JarrahTree 15:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. :/ KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * oops, I know I can be allusive and obscure (there is even a user who encountered me and has a banner on her/hist/whatever dontlike obscurantism heheh my fame to claim) I meant  JarrahTree 15:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * quack quackquack - level of claim - level of english usage - quack quack quack - JarrahTree 15:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, the username is not an policy violation, but in doubt consider filing a report at WP:COIN. :) hehe ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * your chuckle - I dont believe the ed is anything but a blockable troll... JarrahTree 16:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * BLOCKED told you so JarrahTree 16:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's an obovious troll. Now blocked as an sock. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Deal or No Deal merge
Hi,

You added a merge template to this article but when I click on "Discuss" there is no merge discussion taking place? And indeed the talk page that you link to hasn't been edited between December 2013 and January this year. Have you started a merge discussion elsewhere?--5 albert square (talk) 13:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No I haven't, probably I tagged it while NPPing. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you still wish for a merge discussion to take place? Or can the template be removed?--5 albert square (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I still want a merge discussion to take place. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK started :)--5 albert square (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Redirecting Sayyed Ziya -> Zia'eddin Tabatabaee
I'm the person requesting the redirect (not at home, ergo IP). The source is Ervand Abrahamian, "the coup" (I also edited the page in question with that source). I verified the history of the person, and it is the same person. The "sayyed" is missing on the english page, but it's on the German and Spanish pages. There seems to be a million different ways to romanize Persian names; my philosophy is to catch them all. I'm a wikipedia newbie, so I don't know if this talk page is the relevant place to write this. Uglemat (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Could you provide sources other than wikipedia itself? Otherwise, it's an unlikely search term. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I just did. "The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations" is a book, written by Ervand Abrahamian, and he uses that name, in full, 4 times on page 36 alone, and many other times in the book. Uglemat (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, the redirect has been created. Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

VietnameseYoungling
So...what does "Per below" mean? I'm sorry if I bothered you, I'm terribly young and new. VietnameseYoungling (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The previous decline reason stated in your AFC submission. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Mayestron rapper
Hello

I've just created a page and you declined it please would you mind to remove it for me please here is the page i've created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mayestron_(rapper) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talk • contribs) 17:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin and I'm unable to delete pages. You can tag WP:G7 for the admins to delete it for you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Help me out
I don't mean to delete it, I wanna make page for an artist and I already make one but it still declined all the time, Here is the link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mayestron_(rapper) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talk • contribs) 21:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, I noticed you've asked the same questions with KylieTastic and also on IRC. Please don't canvass our editors who are unrelated – take a chance to review the pages we linked to on your talk page, and please let me know if you have further questions. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Help me out Please
Of course I need help plz coz I don't want my first page to be deleted that I created and that why I still claiming it, plz do not delete it I won't create another one without any permission  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talk • contribs) 21:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please look at my previous response for the same reason. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

04:10:26, 12 January 2017 review of submission by 38.75.224.122
Question re your rejection of the draft of 'Tory Bruno">

mment: Specifically this is simply a business PR listing and none of it satisfies our established policies; there's

no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else

Not following your logic. This person leads the World's largest and most prolific space launch company. He is one of the best known individuals in the space industry.

A simple googling of his name yields pages and pages of news articles. Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Washington Post, CNN, CNBC, Fortune, Forbes.... etc

Please help me understand how he is not notable
 * I declined your submission again for unreliable sources. The comment you posted was actually SwisterTwister's which I mostly agreed with the comment. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

WP:AGF
The tone of your NAC of Tennisuser123's ORCP was uncalled for. As none of us know what the future may hold for them in an RFA, statements like "Frankly, you have no chance of passing an RFA" are inappropriate and are a violation of AGF. If you'll notice, everyone else was saying they may well stand a chance in the foreseeable future. I'd change the wording if I were you. Thanks, Patient Zerotalk 12:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Then, please feel free to revert my closure and then you close it with a good tone. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, if you don't mind me doing so. Patient Zerotalk 12:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

15:41:34, 14 January 2017 review of submission by Rohollamahdavi
Hi, and thank you for your help but my reference was FDA and I think this topic is very fascinating because it can be useful for every person who works in pharmaceutical industry. thank you again
 * Your draft still has no references, if you need help on referencing, see WP:Referencing for beginners or stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of Indycar broadcasters
Hello, you rightly rejected this draft a couple of weeks ago. A similar page was created in mainspace at List of Indycar broadcasters within minutes of the draft being started. However, the creator has seemingly ignored the article until today when he copied the content of the draft to the page (no attribution). By way of background, this is a long-term IP-hopping editor well-known to the Wiki Formula One project (and other motorsport projects) who also edits as 'Rowde'. He makes a habit of this sort of thing (amongst other "Wiki-sins'); creating both pages and drafts/userpages for topics which probably won't be accepted. Anyway, I was wondering about the best way to deal with this particular instance? Thanks for any suggestions. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe PROD this article? This is still NOTDIRECTORY. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I see you've already done so. Eagleash (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

ok
you live in a country where gender, humanity and a few other things are being reversed in a few days, but not too sure where you get the 'she' from JarrahTree 03:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I clearly don't know! :) I use random gender identity stuff lol. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Rick James
You should read what someone writes before engaging in petty reversions. I was posting a relevant query about the bloody article, that you twice sniped. Enjoy your fiefdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.69.15.196 (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, your comments violated WP:NOTFORUM. Talk pages are for discussing improvements not for general discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * KGirl, not really. The article showed some random name that an IP had changed it to. This IP was just trying to sort it out. Primefac (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

02:04:27, 16 January 2017 review of submission by FogrolirGrumbane
I'm not requesting a re-review, just want to ask an honest question for a better guideline for redoing the references etc...

It says to list verifiable information, and while I realize a lot of it is from the authors website directly, several references are from the authors pages from amazon, good reads etc. I am not sure what would be considered verifiable as the author has stated on his official facebook page several tikes that he generally does not do interviews for sites or give out much personal information. If I go to the poetry websites and link the book compilations of his poetry would that help? His personal information would rely solely on his website, unless I pulled his public record to verify things such as his being arrested and such.

Just looking for clarification, as to me personally, you cant get more verifiable than from the persons website itself. Though I did also link an outside website that did a profile on him from the United Kingdom.

Sorry this is so long! Just want to see if linking the compilation books would help, or if it is more his personal info that is the issue. Thanks guys!

FogrolirGrumbane (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * PRs and soical media are not reliable sources. You need sources that are reilable and independent of each topic such as major news or book reviews. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Sri Lanka Air Force Women related article
@KGirlTrucker, I am not being able to find any more reference regarding Sri Lanka Air Force Women's Wing, you may consider deleting that.Katree en vasal (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin, and I'm unable to delete pages. You can tag CSD G7 to let the admins delete it for you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

MoonMail deletion suggestion
Is there anything we can make to get MoonMail article published? What was wrong in the article so I can help fix it? Alexandresaiz (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC) alexandresaiz
 * The article only has one reference to a blog which is not reilable sources. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

01:47:53, 18 January 2017 review of submission by BenHirons
Hello,

You recently reviewed and declined the submission of my page 'Smartpay'. I was just wondering why the referencing does not show the subject's notability as I've looked over them and believe that they adequately support the notability of the material on the page. If there is anything specific that I am missing please let me know so I can further improve this page.

Thanks for your help, Felicity
 * It needs independent third-party sources to help establish notability such as in-depth news sources. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Kendall Vertes
Just an FYI the page has been repeatedly recreated (and subsequently deleted) and this user tries to get it through by using the name + an entirely different article (see most recent edits.) Not sure what they're trying to accomplish here though. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , that may be true, but there was content added shortly after the A3 tag was added, making that CSD invalid. A7/PROD/AFD might still be applicable, however. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh I agree - I just meant it as a heads up. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)