User talk:KIDB


 * /Archive 1
 * /Archive 2
 * /Archive 3

no! come back!
Come on, you're not leaving us forever are you?? Where will the Székely be without you? And where does it leave me?? I understand the need for a wikibreak but please don't leave forever... K. Lásztocska 05:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * KIDB, is this true? I beg you to reconsider. Dahn 16:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the messages. I am not leaving forever, I will keep an eye on what's going on here and will return if there is something important happening. --KIDB 05:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Good to hear that, and thank you for the diary link. It makes for some rich and amusing reading. Biruitorul 17:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

You're back?!
Szia!!! I actually just saw that video just yesterday on my favorite English-language Budapest blog. Hilarious...and disgusting...and downright frightening. She can't be for real?

Soooo glad to see you back! :) K. Lásztocska talk 13:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:WP:User contributions
Please userfy this template, i.e. move it into your userspace then request that the new redirect be deleted. –Pomte 05:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Xmas
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! -- R O   A M A  T  A A  | msg  18:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Szekely Land map
We are discussing the accuracy of your Szekely Land map here. Please join the discussion.--MariusM (talk) 23:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Also, could I please ask you to check these changes? Does everything look right to you? Thanks. Biruitorul (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Basically my original definition of a Székely Settlement was "a settlement within a Székely Seat". Now I had a look at the changes and it seems to me that other places have been added that are in the neighbourhood and have/had ethnic Hungarian inhabitants. According to my sources, eg. Aranyosgyéres/Campia Turzii was part of Torda County in the 19th century and did not belong to Aranyos Seat. --KIDB (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Catedrala.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catedrala.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Civility
Hi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at Civility/Poll, so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Hungarian names of Romanian places
Hi KIDB, I have been working on Hungarian related settlements in Tranylvania, at least until now.

I knew that in 2007 there was a kind of compromise with Romanian editors at the Odorhei/Székelyudvarhely discussion page and you were an imporatnt party of it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Odorheiu_Secuiesc

I worked on Transylvania settlements article in compliance with the compromise reached there i.e. if Hungarian population is more than 20%, the Hungarian name should be bolded in the lead and put in the infobox.

As of 23rd, March 2010 User: Iadrian yu deleted all bolded Hungarian names from the articles of the Szekler counties and when I reverted, he started an incident case. As a result of it, the admin ruled that the 2007 compromise is not valid anymore. The change was supported by 3 editors, 2 out of them with account created only days before. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive605 (decision by admin Mjroots)

What do you think about this? I see from the discussion you had a good relationship with moderate Romanian editors. If noone shares my opinion or no one believes that a positive result can be achieved, I do not want to insist, in vain Rokarudi--Rokarudi 09:15, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Hello, KIDB. I have removed a "warning" and a "block notice" from your talk page. These messages were left (for no reason, as far as I can see) by an overeager editor and I have warned them about this behavior. I apologize for taking the liberty of editing your user talk in this way, but I see you have not edited in a while and I did not want you to be greeted with an untrue block message on your return. Please message me if you have any questions. Regards  Tide  rolls  05:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms Kingdom of Hungary.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coat of Arms Kingdom of Hungary.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

románia
Szia, láttam te is hozzáfűztél romániával kapcsolatban. próbáltam kijavítani a cikket, mert tele volt olyamsikkel, hogy a "románok" ezt meg azt csinálták a XIV. sz-ban, meg hogy Vlad megvédte a "román határt" és hasonlók. Ha jól tudom (szerintem jól) akkor abban az időben nem létezett olyan, hogy Románia, sem románok. Vlachok, oláhok, nem tudom hogy nevezték magukat, de biztos nem románnak. Románia ha jól tudom az 1800-as évek közepe-vége felé kapta nevét, és a mai Románia 1919-ben jött létrte 3 (rabolt) országrész egyesülésekor. jellemző, hogy ennek a nagy rablásnak a napja román nemzeti ünnep. Na de mindegy is, én nem utálom a románokat, csak nem szeretem, ha elfelejtik, mi hogyan volt. Mivel te rutinosabbnak tűnsz nálam, kérlek segyts, hogy a románia történelme szócikk angol nyelvű verziója ne tartalmazzon ilyen anakronisztikus dolgokat. Köszi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.183.245.214 (talk) 12:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Mountains.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Mountains.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:1490 map.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1490 map.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mountains.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mountains.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Fresko 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fresko 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

M2 motorway (Hungary) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, M2 motorway (Hungary), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  09:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:M2 motorway (Hungary) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:M2 motorway (Hungary), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:M2 motorway (Hungary)


Hello, KIDB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "M2 motorway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM5.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM5.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM7.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM7.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM70.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM70.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM30.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM30.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM0a.jpg


The file File:MotorwayM0a.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM6.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM6.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM0s.jpg


The file File:MotorwayM0s.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Romania - Roman Empire.jpg


The file File:Romania - Roman Empire.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Fresko 2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fresko 2.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Napéshold.jpg


The file File:Napéshold.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MotorwayM3.JPG


The file File:MotorwayM3.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image is a derivative work. We have good license and weak source information on the base image. However, we have no license or source for the derived image and without that we should not keep the image."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr   Tex  03:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)