User talk:KJB2017

Notification of policy on managing conflict of interests
Hello, KJB2017. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Alex Chalk, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Cowlibob (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Alex Chalk, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''While your edits may have been well-intentioned, they destroyed the referencing in the article. I strongly suggest that, rather than edit the article directly, you present your proposed changes at Talk:Alex Chalk. If other editors agree with the changes, they can help you make sure they're formatted properly.'' —C.Fred (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Edits on Alex Chalk
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Chalk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please check the article's talk page for more information.

I've edited the page and kept some of your constructive edits and manually reverted the rest. I hope this will help you see what is constructive on Wikipedia and what isn't. Please do not engage in an edit war - I see your edits have now been reverted a few times. Let me know if I can help you in any way or if you need more information. Thanks, Legendiii 23:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC) (find me here)

May 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content—or removing sourced content without a source to support your reason for removal—as you did to Alex Chalk. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''If the investigation has wrapped up, please provide a source clearing Chalk. Otherwise, please don't assert that the media outlets reporting on the investigation got it wrong without superior sources to support your claim.'' —C.Fred (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)