User talk:KKoolstra

Seguir el pulso
Dear Sir Dimtri Nikolaj and Estimated dr. K.Koolstra: I herewith like to really thank you for your helpfull support in the case of my recent astonishing blocking up from further editing again. In the mean time with best regards I remain faithfully yours: D.A. Borgdorff - e.i. MASc. by 86.83.155.44 (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Citation needed
Can you explain why you replaced the 'citation needed' flag in standard deviation? I think it is nonsense to put citations to every easily provable fact that can be checked in many different standard textbooks. What is then, according to you, the wikipedia standard? Why is a citation needed for this mathematical fact and not for all the other mathematical facts, formulae, etc. in this article. Or do you think that those should be tagged also. By the way, what do you think how it looks to the reader? It looks as if there is doubt about these facts, which is absolutely nonsense. KKoolstra (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * All this is explained at Manual of Style/Mathematics. Among other things, it says that if a citation is requested one should be supplied. Readers cannot be expected to investigate untold text books to find a source. See also Verifiability. As far as I know, "how it looks to the reader" is not one of the criteria for deciding inclusion in Wikipedia. Melcombe (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect interwikis
Hi, My bot did that automatically, Any bot could do the same thing. Someone may put incorrect interwikis about white elephant in wrong page. I can't find where is the wrong page to fix it my self. Thanks for understanding.-- M.Gedawy Talk 11:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, It's just that I can't find either which page is the 'cause' of the wrong links. I hope it is fixed now. KKoolstra (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Replied at my talkpage.
Thenub314 (talk) 18:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)