User talk:KKutie

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Sekute™


The article Sekute™ has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism containing the ™ character.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * This article has been moved to sekute. It will still be deleted as it is a non-notable neologism. Please note the various reasons this may be deleted. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sekute
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sekute, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sekute
A tag has been placed on Sekute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Sekute
How is it copyright infringement when its the word I created? The external website does belong to me and I would allow Wikipedia to use the text. But that would be just for Wikipedia, correct? (KKutie (talk) 23:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC))
 * I have replied to your message on my talk page, but I will also respond here if I may:
 * The website which the text was copied from clearly shows that it is under copyright. With respect, we have no evidence that you have any connection with the website/company - in theory, anyone could say that! We have ways to verify that you are the copyright owner, but as neither the phrase or the company meet Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines (or Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organisations), then even with the copyright owner's permission to use the text, an article would be deleted
 * Even if permission was granted for Wikipedia to use the text, it could then be used by anyone for any purpose (including commercial) as per the licenses we use here at Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL - there is no such thing as "Wikipedia-only" release.
 * "its the word I created" - this is the definition of a neologism! I looked for press coverage of the term, and the only place I could find was at the company's website and social networking sites. Unless it is a commonly-used phrase, it would not meet the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia.
 * Until there is coverage of the company in reliable and independent sources, it would not meet the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

New Text

Thanx for getting back to me. I pretty much understand the guide lines now. But just for future reference until the phrase is more used in commerce or worldwide it won't be consider for wikipedia, correct? (KKutie (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Basically, yes! Although it's not quite that simple - as many phrases don't have articles on their own - they tend to be part of another article.

I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a company or organisation. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username. Thank you.


 * Please note that an account can only be used by one person.
 * Wikipedia's Username policy says Explicit use of a name or url of a company, group or product as a username is not permitted. Your username should represent you. Accounts that represent an entire group or company are not permitted.
 * It also says here User accounts can only represent individuals. Sharing an account – or the password to an account – with others is not permitted, and doing so will result in the account being blocked.


 * Please also note that changing your account name does not mean that you are not bound by the Conflict of interest guidelines.

--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, KKutie, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 17:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)