User talk:KLPrescott

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Millermk90 (talk) 05:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The phrases in the article that are promotional need to be reworded to remain neutral. Some specific examples are "allows participating employees to receive an instant disbursement of their accrued wages in advance of their next-scheduled payday for a nominal fee," "provide employees living paycheck to paycheck with a fair and reasonable alternative," and "allows participating employees to avoid these charges by giving them advance access to their earned but unpaid wages."  Negative statements about alternative options (e.g. "And payday lenders often charge interest rates on an annualized basis of 400 percent or more") also contribute the promotional nature of the article. Also, the topic may not be notable, since only one of the sources you gave even mentions the company.  WP:ORG says that "A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization."  In light of that, you may need more sources which actually talk about the company to establish notability.  If more sources don't exist, then the subject simply doesn't belong in Wikipedia.  Millermk90 (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I think it's close. Do you mind if I tweak it to cull out the remaining promotionalism? User:King4057 14:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Be my guest. And thanks.KLPrescott (talk) 18:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Cool. I made some tweaks and suspect it will be approved now. User:King4057 19:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk&#124;contrib) 18:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

flexwage.com link
Hi. Thanks for your addition to the Payday loan article. I removed the http://www.flexwage.com link since it does not meet either our external links or reliable sources guidelines:
 * Reliable Sources Guideline
 * External Links Guideline

Thanks for helping us. -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 23:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FlexWage Solutions concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FlexWage Solutions, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission FlexWage Solutions


Hello KLPrescott. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled FlexWage Solutions.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC FlexWage Solutions was accepted
 FlexWage Solutions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! CorporateM (Talk) 22:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of FlexWage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FlexWage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FlexWage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)