User talk:KNHaw/Archive 3

March 2020, Mamamoo page
Hi, I'm thankful for your help. I'm new to wikipedia and i have a question. I do think the content i deleted should not being included since It's not relevant to Mamamoo's career. This type of content isn't included on others artist pages so i was wondering why?

Again Thank you for your time :) Nayramoo (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reaching out to me about your edit! The reason I reverted it is because, although you may be a fan of the group, the content you deleted was well sourced (see wp:source) and is an important point in the group's history - I *do* think it is an important in recounting their career.  The goal of Wikipedia is to record *all* reliable information about its subjects, not just the things that we think are positive or happy.


 * I understand that as a fan of the group, this might bug you. However, I think that you should actually reread the text you deleted.  When you read the footnotes it shows that the members of the group handled a very tough mistake in a very good way.  The apologized and moved onwards.  As someone who is not a fan, I know very little about the group, but I have to say that I think it speaks very well about them, their morals, and their willingness to face mistakes and continue doing what they love.


 * If you have any questions about my edit or anything else, please ask me about them here. Thanks!  -- KNHaw   (talk)  04:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for giving me advice on my Talk page! I really appreciate it! I am a beginner. I joined on March 24 2020. Again I thank you for your advice. Weather person 1 (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I am the world's first hologram certified English Phonetics Trainer from London
You can do the verification from the Association of hologram certification from London. With my face inside the sticker. The original English Phonetics Trainer certified and registered.

Call me or mail me for any clarifications. The information I edited is the true information.

With kind regards S.Loganathan World's first hologram certified English Phonetics Trainer +919087058881 eipl2019@gmail.com Loganabiz (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reaching out to me. I do not doubt your claim nor its importance to your career.  Congratulations on your achievement!  You should be proud about your achievements.


 * However, one of the underlying principals of Wikipedia is the concept of notability, as laid out in here. Simply put, there is not enough room on Wikipedia to put *all* information on a topic, so we restrict the entries to things that are unique or notable.  If you were to be placed in the article, it would be necessary to post information about, say, the first Spanish Phonetics Trainer in Madrid and one for every other language.  Then we'd have to place one for anyone with a college degree studying holography or who wrote a thesis peripherally related to holography or every person who ever patented or sold holography equipment... you can see how this would get out of hand.  And, as important as your achievements might be to you, I do not think that it is notable enough to be included in the general article about holography as a whole.


 * Now, I understand if you disagree with me. That is your right.  If so, I would recommend you raise the topic on the talk page for the article and ask for consensus about whether it is suitable to redo your edit on the page.  After that discussion, we can see what the results are.


 * Thank you for your reaching out to me! -- KNHaw   (talk)  05:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Orange Cassidy
Hello. I have seen you included in the Orange Cassidy article (or at least, reverted a vandalism) that he wrestled as Fire Ant in Chikara. However, I'm reading the article but I can't see any source stating he wrestled under that name. Are you sure he wrestled as Fire Ant? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * I checked the history and the only edit I can see that matches your description is back on May 4th. Is that the one?  I was simply reverting a large deletion and was unaware if that was correct information or not.  If that was incorrect, please let me know here so I will not interfere with your work.


 * Thanks for reaching out to me! -- KNHaw   (talk)  16:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was the one. I think you did a good job. However, after reading the article, it can't find if the information is sourced. I was asking If you know something I didn't know. Thanks :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to RedWarn
Hello, KNHaw! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 75 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767  talk!  03:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Sainte-Mère-Église Window 2a.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sainte-Mère-Église Window 2a.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for raising the issue. I am unsure of how to proceed. I believe the image is not copyrighted, but I understand that a mere belief is not sufficient for that. I have started a discussion at Media copyright questions and pinged you in it in order to determine how to proceed. If you wish to join the discussion there perhaps we can get this resolved one way or the other.  -- KNHaw   (talk)  06:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Sari Pohjonen moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sari Pohjonen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sari Pohjonen


Hello, KNHaw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sari Pohjonen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Just a reminder to always smile!
Did you know that you can't lean your head and smile?

Gotcha! Anything you should smile more it looks great on you!!!

This is a word from me just to say to never get let down and if so you should always bring yourself back up and never to give up!!!! Frog E fort (talk) 23:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Al Sobotka "Vandalism" warning
I've just joined Wikipedia with the hope of lending a helping hand to the site. The edit I made was NOT in any way vandalism and was simply adding some details about the individual in question. I ask that you please remove you warning about my edit. Pissyboy Mercutio (talk) 06:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Warning removed. Please see your talk page for details. -- KNHaw  (talk)  14:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Been doing this a while
Admins call me Blue Barette Bam for the account I made over a decade ago, but more recently I was well known as CGSFH for vandalism related to Connie Glynn. Have a wonderful day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.65.174.67 (talk) 02:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)


 * That's just sad, man. Sad. -- KNHaw  (talk)  02:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit to Conway's Game of Life Rules
Hi, I recently made an edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life#Rules. Found the edit had been removed today, with notice saying to contact you at this page.

I did not remove any information, only added to the article a logically simpler (and computationally more efficient) version of the ruleset. This version produces identical output from the same input, and is therefore equivalent, except as noted it is faster and easier for both humans and computers to process and/or understand.

Reason given is that there was not a reference. Problem is, there is nothing to reference except plugging it into a program and witnessing it in-effect produces the same final result. In essence-- it is the algorithmic equivalent of a mathematically reduced equation.

Not sure how else to go about this, because the above is self-evident, though tested, and therefore I do not have a document to refer to.

This is no different than the second version of the ruleset already in the document, which also does not have a reference but is likewise presented by fiat-- though I have seen this second version crop up all over the Internet in articles and videos about programming Conway's Game of Life because it is simplified.

The two additional rulesets as I presented them, are further logically reduced versions of the original ruleset that Conway came up with, and the additional ruleset that was already presented in the document.

The reason I posted this edit is because if someone is trying to understand what is actually happening on each tick/generation of the Game algorithm (say for example, trying to write the program on their own), it is much easier to understand for a human, and much faster for the computer, being that it eliminates --or rather condenses-- multiple, unnecessary steps.

The only thing I know of to refer to would be to plug it into a Conway's Game of Life program in place of the original ruleset in the algorithm. Which is how I proved it, after running the simulation mentally. It works, and it works better than the other two versions. So I believe it to be worthy of note.

Is there some other way I should present this? JadiCraft (talk) 08:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The basic ruleset can be logically simplified as so:
 * Any cell with 3 neighbors lives.
 * Any live cell with 2 neighbors lives.
 * All other cells die.
 * And further condensed into two simpler logical outcomes as:
 * If cell has 3 neighbors, or cell is alive and has 2 neighbors, cell lives--
 * Else, cell dies.
 * JadiCraft (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reaching out to me. I'm actually digging through my edit history and can't find the revision you're talking about. Also the article is not on my watchlist, although I am familiar with the game (I implemented a poor version of it back in the 80's) and *thought* it was on my list. Your current account seems to be new so I'm assuming you made the edit under an IP address or other account before making this one.


 * So, I can't say anything about your edit. But everything you wrote above seems fine to me. It's possible I had an issue with spelling or grammar and put the wrong comment in my change or I simply reverted your change on mistake. In either case, I apologize and think your edit as stated above would be a fine addition to the article.


 * So, go ahead and dive in with your change! Just in case there's a weird technical error on the page, though, please double check your work after you've done it to ensure the edit didn't somehow get mangled in the process.


 * Good luck and happy editing!


 * KNHaw  (talk)  17:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)