User talk:KNM/Archive2

ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು
ನಿಮಗೂ ಸಹ ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಹಾರ್ದಿಕ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು -- ನವೀನ್

ನನ್ನ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು ಕೂಡ. Shushruth \talk page \ contribs

ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವ
ಸಿರಿಗನ್ನಡಂ ಗೆಲ್ಗೆ, ನಿಮಗು ಸಹಾ ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು. ಮೊದಲೆ ಸಲಾ ನನ್ನ ಟಾಕ ಪುಟದ ಮ್ಯಾಲೆ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ಸಂದೇಶಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಧನ್ಯವಾದಗಳು. -- IndianCow  Talk  09:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

ಸಿರಿಗನ್ನಡಂ ಬಾಳ್ಗೆ
ಸಿರಿಗನ್ನಡಂ ಗೆಲ್ಗೆ, ಸಿರಿಗನ್ನಡಂ ಬಾಳ್ಗೆ. ಹಸಿರಾಗಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡ, ಉಸಿರಾಗಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡ. ನಮ್ಮ ಕನ್ನಡ ಭಾಷೆಯನ್ನು ಉಸಿರಾಗಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು ದೈನಂದಿನ ಜೀವನ ನಡೆಸೋಣ.--Raja Hussain 07:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Chalukya
KNM, I have not heard from briggete after our last comm on oct 23rd. what next?Do I contact here again?Dineshkannambadi 14:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala architects
The paragraph is ready with citations.Dineshkannambadi 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Chalukya
The Peer review discussion has been archived. What next?How do we go for FAC? Please take another look for syntax, semantics etc. So Shall I.Dineshkannambadi 21:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:KAR
Hi KNM, I had started a Karnataka Portal some time back. It has been lying under construction for some time now. I made some changes today also. But it still needs some work. Would you be able to chip in when you find time? Thanks. Sarvagnya 07:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Bangladesh
Actually, the user Adnandx is correct in making some of the changes. Bangladesh does not have a prime minister at this moment. When the previous govt's term ended, the power was handed over to a Caretaker government, consisting of a chief advisor, and a group of advisors. This year, the president has taken over the dual role of President and Chief Advisor. There is no prime minister or any other such posts now, until the next election is held and a new govt is formed (sometime in January, 2007 or so).

Thanks. --Ragib 18:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

infobox
Hi. Can you create one nice box for Western and Eastern Chalukyas as well when you have time.Dineshkannambadi 16:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment, KNM, from Parthi's comment, can you change the Infobox to just Chalukya dynasty and let everything else remain as is. Should we call it Chalukya Vamsha in Kannada and Chalukya dynasty in English then?Dineshkannambadi 02:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see this talk. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi KNM, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam ( T / C ) 06:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Western Chalukya
KNM, when you have time please add the Kannada text to the info box I created. It still says Chalukya Vamsha because I copied it from Badami Chalukya page.Dineshkannambadi 02:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Bengavaluru
Hi there, I've added the appropriate citation. The referenced article had previously been cited in another section; however no explicit reference to Bengavaluru had been previously made. Thanks AreJay 02:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala
KNM, I have written down the list of TBD for this page before peer review in the discussion page for Hoysala. Please take a look.Dineshkannambadi 15:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala kings
KNM, Some of the Hoysala kings in the info box dont have dates and my soruces dont give them dates because of insufficient inscriptional evidence. Do we need to keep them in the box or remove them? They are mentioned in the prose section anyway. Also, not much is said about the Hoysala branch in TN (Ramanatha/Vishwanatha) so I did not create any pages for them, but are mentioned in the "consolidation" section though. Maybe we dont need them either because they again merged with the main empire without many events there and basically remained in control of Halebidu all the time. Can we compress the box, it looks a bit long now.?Dineshkannambadi 20:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, I had added other capitals in Kannanur Kuppam and Tiruvannamalli (were temporary ones for strategic purposes to control Pandya, Cholas and fight the sultan of Madurai). Maybe we dont need to mention them as they were not really regal capitals. Ballala III stationed himself in Tiruvannamali for some years and fought from there after Halebidu was sacked in early 14th century. Mentioning too many secondary capitals is confusing. What do you think? Vijayanagara is important as it provides continuity to the next empire. Also, Sosevur the earliest capital was when they were a tiny feudatory and most of the world has not heard of it anyway. What do you think?Dineshkannambadi 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism
Thank you for reverting vandalism of my talk page. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 12:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

re: Baka
Though I take note of your point, I had planned to do nothing about personal disputes because I don't have enough time. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 05:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Chalukya
KNM, the article has been accepted as a FA. I would like to thank you for your efforts in making this happen as a team.Dineshkannambadi 16:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see; you're trying to make a "Today's featured article" request. The correct place for this would be at the top of Today's featured article/requests, and not in a new article.  Please place the content of Chalukya dynasty/MainPage Request at the top of that page and place a db-author tag on the original.  Thanks! --Maxamegalon2000 17:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Super, but in the future it would probably be best to make such a page in your namespace, at User:KNM/Chalukya Dynasty Main Page Request, for instance. Right now you've made an actual article in the encyclopedia.  --Maxamegalon2000 18:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and moved it to User:KNM/Chalukya dynasty/MainPage Request. --Maxamegalon2000 22:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

award
Thanks. Gives a warm feeling.Dineshkannambadi 18:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

FA request
I made one for chalukya. Take a look and see if its ok. Or should I have waited? I did not get any reply from you guys regarding the content, so I assumed it was ok. We can always change it though if you guys think other wise.Dineshkannambadi 20:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

BangaloreBuzz revert
Hello, KNM -- if I understand the history page correctly, you removed the link I added to the Bangalore page to a blog called BangaloreBuzz. I don't really understand why, but since I am not a heavy Wikipedia user I might have done something wrong, so please enlighten me. Personally I find that particular blog a great aid to following news in Bangalore, and I just wanted to share it with others who were looking for information about the city. Thanks. MarkPritchard 21:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala
KNM, haven't heard from you for a few days. Do you think you have time for a cpedit, grammar/spelling check.Dineshkannambadi 20:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala
Users Mattisse and BostonMA are also helping us with copyedits. Feel free to jump in whenever you are free.Dineshkannambadi 19:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Smiley Award
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

Scripts issue
Hi KNM, I'm in favour of getting rid of ALL non-roman scripts from the pages. This is afterall an English language encyclopedia. I really don't see a point in them. IMO most people pushing for the inclusion of these scripts only want these to advertise the ethnicity of the subject. Cheers - Parthi talk/contribs 04:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I may have misinterpretted Utcursch's point. What is the special case with Satyameva Jayate? I may have been wrong in interpretting his proposal as allowing native scripts for non-English subject matters like those I mentioned. - Parthi talk/contribs 04:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

KNM
Hello KNM. I think that your DYK nom is good, but it needs to be in prose form to get a run on the main page.

Also, I am hoping to get an improvement drive on Ganguly, Dravid, Tendulkar in the near future - It will be hard like Ian Thorpe, which has only just passed, but I am confident that with the help of ALoan and Nichalp (who focuses on Indian FAs), both of whom have 10+ FAs and are good with getting the prose smoothened up ( the hardest part) and are active in cricket, we can get the job done. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion Vamshi
Hi. I saw this stub and I've proposed its deletion because I don't see that he meets WP:BIO through translating one book. But that's only my opinion. --Mereda 17:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hoysala Empire
KNM, Hoysala empire has become a featured article. Thank you for your many contributions.Dineshkannambadi 17:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back
Great to have you back! Not sure if you are still interested in cricket bios, but I am currently trying to work Harbhajan Singh up for an FA. It also has a free picture, so it can be put on the main page of Wikipedia during the World Cup if we get it done on time. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: Vatteluttu
Hello,

Thank you for the spell check for Kannada on the Vatteluttu page. It is much appreciated. By the way, I have recently formed the WikiProject Dravidian civilizations and would like to know if you would be interested in joining our group and participating in contributing to any Dravidian topic of your choice. Our project will be focussed on everything that has to do with the Dravidian civilizations of the Kannadigas, Tamils, Telugus, Malayalees, and other groups. It will also cover Dravidian civilizations outside of India like the Brahuis of Pakistan, and the Malto of Bangladesh. Furthermore, WikiPoject Dravidian civilizations will cover a wide array of Dravidian topics from arts, language, ethnicities, religion, history, and much more. If you are interested, please link to WikiProject Dravidian civilizations and add your name in the Members section. Thank you again for your contribution to the Vatteluttu page. Regards.

Wiki Raja 06:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Beware of these characters - wikiraja and venu62. They are POV pushers and tag all south Indian articles with dravidian template, they will call a donkey living in bangalore as a dravidian donkey. Thanks for reverting the template which they infested in the article Carnatic music 59.92.32.86 22:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * User 59.92.32.86 is blocked. Wiki Raja 10:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

hi
see Babri Mosque and Talk:Babri Mosque, there is a discussion about "terrorism". Baka man  04:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Gokak agitation
Thanks a lot for adding some precious content to the article. The article really looks informative now. Gnanapiti 19:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Archive please.
Hi KNM, I think its time you get one of those fancy archive boxes and start archiving this page. Please. Thanks. Sarvagnya 07:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

And oh, btw, good work on the Gokak agitation page. Congrats and keep it up! :) Sarvagnya 07:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks KNM
"nim'maatu kelee bhaalaa santosha-vaayitu"Kanchanamala 07:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Fast neutron therapy was successful
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Moving your own nominations to DYK
Please don't move your own nominations from the Suggestions page to Next Update. Suggestions need to be looked over by others before they are selected to make sure they meet the criteria for DYK, We also try to work to a rough oldest first order which you have ignored in picking your hook. Thanks, Yomangani talk 15:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Barnstar
Hi KNM, Please have a look at the Barn star Dinesh has given me in my talk page. I'm trying to reproduce the same structure in my user page, but I'm not able to do so. Can you please help me recreating the same table and content as in my talk page? Thanks Gnanapiti 22:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks awesome, Thanks a lot. So adding (br) did the trick? Gnanapiti 23:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Hoysala architecture
A reviewer has commented that the "Notable Temples" section at the bottom is poorely formatted in lower resolutions. Does he mean the images appear displaced in different resolutions or does he mean the template of temples appears poorly placed?Dineshkannambadi 15:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The images at the bottom seem to be completely off. Is this a resolution with my screen?Dineshkannambadi 21:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Amoghavarsha I

 * currently, Amoghavarsha I is redirected to Amoghavarsha. Shall we keep it that way? The main article on Rashtrakutas calls him Amoghavarsha I throughout as there is a Amoghavarsha II and III. But the kings page calls him Amoghavarsha with a redirect.Dineshkannambadi 16:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Amoghavarsha II and III
Amoghavarsha II and III are hardly known. So I dont intend to create elborate pages for them more than what already exists.thanksDineshkannambadi 00:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC).


 * Thanks. This is a new type of topic and this success will greatly help in future architecture related articles w.r.t other empires.thanks for your contributions.Dineshkannambadi 21:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK
Hello KNM. I'm sorry I missed your message because I am away on weekends. BTW, Harbhajan Singh which you edited in the past is now on FAC. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The DYK updates
The noms were from 24 February - and had expired. I'm about to go offline. I'll leave Shanel a note. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Shanel was offline and hasn't been back yet. I put the noms back, as I did not intend to revert her choices.  &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 12:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied
Replied on my page Sarvagnya 23:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK nom for Mayurasharma
Why is in the March 4th section?Dineshkannambadi 02:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC) And how long will it take for acceptance and appearence on DYK section of main page?Dineshkannambadi 02:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the two books I have on Kadambas, Kamath and G.Moraes are about the best books one can find on the Kadambas. Perhaps because the first Banavasi kingdom of Kadambas was so long ago and the later Kadambas of Hangal, Goa, Bailnadu, Belur etc were feudatory chiefdoms of larger Kannada empires, there are not too many writers. Fortunately, my book by Moraes gives a good account (250 pages) of the Banavasi,Hangal and Goa Kadambas. Eventually I plan to build full scale articles for all three like Chalukyas. I also have to somehow visit Banavasi, Halasi, Talagunda, Degamve for photographs of temples inscriptions etc. Last year I was in Jog falls, 30kms from Banavasi but could not go because of a full schedule.Dineshkannambadi 02:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Konkani name in Kannada script
will post a reply on the Konkani Language talk page ASAP. --Deepak D&#39;Souza 05:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Waiting for your response --Deepak D&#39;Souza 10:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK

 * Thanks for your help.-- Carabinieri 19:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)