User talk:KOKO25

Your repeated content deletions on Romeo Roselli article
You have been deleting contributions from various editors on the Romeo Roselli article without leaving an explanation in the edit summary or commenting on the discussion page Talk:Romeo_Roselli. Per Wikipedia guidelines, you should explain these deletions, and consensus should be reached according to Wikipedia guidelines.

I have strived to increase the quality of his article, adding wiki links, references, and external links. The first time you deleted my content, I posted my concerns on Talk:Romeo_Roselli in the hopes that we could discuss your reasoning. Now you have deleted even more of my contributions without explanation. I am especially frustrated that you have been deleting references for content in the article. You have also deleted tags asking for citations on unverifiable information, which I attempted to research for reference.

I believe in good faith that everything I have contributed to this article fits Wikipedia guidelines for neutrality, verifiability, and the other 5 pillars, as well as conforming to guidelines about biographies of living persons.

Some of my contributions have been similar to those of other editors that you have also deleted without explanation, as shown in the Romeo Roselli article history. The separate attempts by several editors over multiple years to add similar content seems to show consensus for facts in this article.

I recommend the following articles for useful information, and encourage you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines.
 * The 5 Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Single-purpose Accounts on Wikipedia
 * Neutral Point of View in Wikipedia
 * Wikipedia Etiquette

Please comment on Talk:Romeo_Roselli BEFORE you make any more revisions to the content posted by other editors. I look forward to working on this article with you Thank you.
 * Spanky dreamr (talk) 02:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your response on my talk talk page. Please post your comments on Talk:Romeo_Roselli... the discussion should happen on the talk page for the article. (I posted the previous communication on your talk page because I had not received response to the comments on Talk:Romeo_Roselli, and thought perhaps you did not read that page.)  Thanks!
 * Spanky dreamr (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)