User talk:KPPEVT

December 2012
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Open peer review. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 08:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Altered Walter. I noticed that you recently removed some content from SCIENCEDOMAIN international without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Altered Walter (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at SCIENCEDOMAIN international, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove sourced material critical of the subject of the article without a valid reason. Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Open peer review, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop inserting irrelevant promotional material into this article. Randykitty (talk) 13:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Open peer review, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Randykitty (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for using Wikipedia only for promotional purposes. Your only edits so far have been to promote a specific publisher, both in that article (which is likely to be deleted unless additional sources can be found) and on a different Wikipedia page. After your block is up, if you don't want that article to be deleted, you're going to need to find reliable sources independent of the site that discuss it. If such sources do not exist, the site cannot have a page in Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Qwyrxian (talk) 14:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)