User talk:KP 0503/sandbox

Hello kalpit, I am gonna review yoursSSASHWIN (talk) 01:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

1. There are no enough hyperlinks, if possible try to add them by referring to Wikipedia pages.

2. Don't use "&" use and, it looks so casual not in a encyclopedia

3. Rest of it, the paragraph looks fine with enough information, also add one more paragraph related to pathways associated with it, specific functions (or) in some other sections.

That's the end of my reviewSSASHWIN (talk) 01:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall, well explained article using many current references. The only thing that I think you might want to do is wikilink some terms in your article.

Thank you for reviewing my edits, and I've done some minor changes as you guys have suggested to do. I have added more content and links and corrected and rearranged some sentences. KP 0503 (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)KP0503