User talk:KRKwrites

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, KRKwrites! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Chocmilk03 (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the cookies - and for the link to the Task Center! KRKwrites (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, KRKwrites, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad you took up my invitation to join as you will now be able to benefit more directly from our activities. I realize you have had difficulty in following all the background information on Wikipedia but we have a summary of the essentials in connection with women's biographies in our Ten Simple Rules. I see you have quite a bit more to add to your draft of Abigail Larson but just let me know when you think it's ready for main space and I'll see how it looks. I hope that this will be the first of many more biographies of women as you are progressing very well. Please let me know if you run into any further difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! I'm just finishing up a couple of lists and am planning to move into mainspace today. If you have any thoughts to share I'd certainly really appreciate hearing them! :) KRKwrites (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your first article
Thank you very much, KRKwrites, for all the time and effort you have spent on your first article Abigail Larson. It's now on main space and I've given it a B rating as it contains lots of detail and is well sourced. I hope this will be the first of many more, whether or not under specific assignments. Please let me know if ever I can help you again. Happy editng!--Ipigott (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

While double-checking the article, I noticed you had specifically introduced British rather than Canadian/American spellings for colour/watercolour and centres but have left American spellings of honor/honorable. As the subject of the article is American, I would suggest you use American spelling.--Ipigott (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Good catch, thank you! We put U's in words like colour here in Canada, so just force of habit. I will go through and correct when I have a moment. KRKwrites (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You can "correct" it either for Canadian with -our or American -or. As the subject is American, I would suggest you go for American. That will make it easier for future contributors.--Ipigott (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Have you considered nominating the article for GA or FA? I am not an expert, but it seems like it could pass. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry to respond to this a whole month later, but I wanted to thank you for the suggestion - I managed to get the article to GA status, based on your recommendation :) KRKwrites (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Glad I could help, even if it was only giving the idea. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Abigail Larson
Hi there, I don't want to formally pick up the GA review for this article right now, but I thought I would point out a few prose things that you might want to address while you're waiting. 1: the lead is much shorter than a typical GA. If that's all you think is relevant for the lead, it might be a sign that there isn't actually much real content in the article. Maybe you can say something more about her style? 2: the "career" section in particular looks like a list of things she's done rather than a narrative summary. Like #1, this also makes me a bit wary that there's no "there" there. You've got a pretty thorough-looking list of credits at the end of the article, maybe some of the less-important items can be moved there? Or they could be grouped together thematically?

Good luck with it, and welcome! -- asilvering (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * TYSM for the feedback! I was rushing a little to get the article up, and there's more I want to add about style in particular, so maybe I can use some of that to strengthen the lead.
 * With the "career" section, I was kind of trying to show the breadth/diversity of her projects and highlight the most notable or interesting ones (bc she kind of has a lot of credits to her name LOL), which I considered to be her own book (Crimson), her work with Netflix, her work with Mike Mignola, and her work with Evanescence. So maybe I can trim it down a bit and use reviews to beef up the article/demonstrate the significance of those projects? KRKwrites (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yep, that all sounds good. You definitely want to mention her solo art book! If there are any reviews of it it would be great to add those, but make sure they're post-publication, professional reviews, not the kinds of blurbs people wrote while it was being kickstarted. Since it was a self-pub that might be hard to do, though. Basically, the more you manage to form the article into something summative/descriptive rather than "a CV in sentences instead of bullet points", the better off you'll be heading into a GAN. -- asilvering (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I see you got this through to GA! Congrats! -- asilvering (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Did you know
Hi KRKwrites, if you want Abigail Larson to appear on Wikipedia's main page, you could nominate an interesting fact from the article for Did you know. Articles can be nominated within 7 days of publication to main space or achieving good article status. TSventon (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Ooh, good to know, thank you! I'll take a look-see. :) KRKwrites (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abigail Larson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
The article Abigail Larson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Abigail Larson and Talk:Abigail Larson/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canada Black Music Archives (March 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Canada Black Music Archives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Canada_Black_Music_Archives Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheChineseGroundnut&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Canada_Black_Music_Archives reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G.  &lbrack;talk&rbrack;  22:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Abigail Larson
Hello! Your submission of Abigail Larson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ©Geni (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
The article Abigail Larson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Abigail Larson for comments about the article, and Talk:Abigail Larson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Congratulations!--Ipigott (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Abigail Larson
 Schwede 66  00:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hahah, I don't think that fact matches the article :'D but this is very exciting, thank you! KRKwrites (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging