User talk:KRSTIGER~enwiki

Hi KRSTIGER you are so cool!

Speedy deletion of Quantom Of Solace cheats
A tag has been placed on Quantom Of Solace cheats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Paste Let’s have a chat. 12:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Andrew Richards (swimmer)
A tag has been placed on Andrew Richards (swimmer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Krstiger
Hi KRSTIGER. I noticed you created an RfA page some time ago. I was wondering as to what the status of that RfA might be. Please let me know if you still intend to run for adminship with that RfA; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete it for you in about a week or so from today. Regards,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 01:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, yes I still intend to run for adminship. Thanks! --KRSTIGER (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:RfA
Alright, that can definitely be arranged. Your RfA has not been transcluded (i.e. submitted) yet for formal review. Would you like me to do that for you? -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 22:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright then. You will be able to see it at Requests for adminship.  -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 19:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Usually 7 days. During this time, other editors will !vote in your RfA to decide whether you should become an administrator.  -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 19:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can I just say (as I noted on your RfA), that I don't think you are ready for applying to be an administrator yet. You have far too few edits for us to be able to evaluate your abilities as an editor, let alone as a potential administrator. Personally, I would recommend that you contact Fastily (or another admin or bureaucrat) and ask if they could close the RfA as you wish to withdraw. There is absolutely no shame in saying that you wish to withdraw - in fact, it shows that you are aware of the fact that you are not ready yet, which most editors would respect.
 * It is, however, your right to allow it to continue until either the 7 days are completed, or until it is closed by an administrator or bureaucrat as "WP:NOTNOW" (which basically is a way of saying that the community do not think you are ready yet). At the moment, you have 3 opposes and 2 neutrals, with no supports. I have never seen someone with your experience (22 edits) to successfully pass an RfA. If you want to see the criteria for the kind of person which I would support, have a look at User:Phantomsteve/RfA standards - I do not think that I am too different in what I am looking for compared to most other editors (although every one has their own standards of what they look for in an admin, whether stated or not). Feel free to contact me if you want further advice. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/KRSTIGER
Hi KRSTIGER. Well done on your offer of serving as an admin, and on your boldness of offering your services with so little experience. Unfortunately, your RfA will not pass as you do not have enough experience of editing on Wikipedia. People are already quoting Not now, and at some point your RfA will be closed early. If you would like to become an admin on Wikipedia at some point, it would be in your interest to withdraw before the RfA is closed early. By withdrawing yourself, you will show to people that you had enough common sense to take advice - an important requirement for becoming an admin. Keeping your RfA open will be of no benefit to yourself because people will be saying the same thing, and it will simply be wasting other people's time. To withdraw, you just have to make a statement here saying you withdraw. Regards  SilkTork  *YES! 20:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably best to withdraw. Happy Editing - Ret.Prof (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry to tell you that I have closed your RFA early per WP:NOTNOW. Your keenness to serve Wikipedia is admirable, but there's just no chance of your request passing at this point. I'd suggest participating in or simply observing how these requests go to get a sense of what level of experience is necessary to become an administrator on this site.--Chaser (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Userpage
I suppressed the phone number you had on your userpage, that is not acceptable by our privacy policy. Apologies for the inconvenience. What I did do was format your poem for you. Welcome to Wikipedia! Keegan (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mantle (geology), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kleopatra (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called KRSTIGER. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name KRSTIGER~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)