User talk:KRtau16/Archive 1

Thanks for helping me on COVID-19 pandemic in Papua New Guinea.
I really like how you helped on the page. 😉 Esaïe Prickett (talk) 00:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Just doing my job. Thanks for your contribution on Wikipedia. Cheers :-) KRtau16 (talk) 01:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Can you edit Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Papua New Guinea medical cases chart?
PNG has confirmed is first death.Esaïe Prickett (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I see that you've requested another editor to reformat the pandemic data. I've been very busy since I've started School, however I'd like to thank you for continuously updating Wikipedia. Have a blessed day. Cheers. KRtau16 (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Ko na mauri
Dear KRtau16, mauri naba! I kabi taetae Kiribati, teutana. Bukin tera I-Buranti. Tinau ma tamau I-Italy. Natiu e I-Kiribati. E mena in Fiji. Tekeraoi ! Tiaboo moa.--Arorae (talk) 11:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah ngaia! Ka teimatoa te ibuobuoki ae koa tia ni karaoia iaon Wikipedia! Tiaboo ao tekeraoi. :-) KRtau16 (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Teutana! Please help me because I did not understand all your words. Ko rabwa.--Arorae (talk) 11:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry! What I said is that "Keep up the great work you have done in contributing to Wikipedia". Cheers :-) KRtau16 (talk) 11:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Now that you have translated I understand very well (teimatoa=keep up; ibuoboki=work; ae koa tia= that you have done; karaoia=contribute). Ngaia?--Arorae (talk) 11:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's right! See, your Kiribati is not that bad! Ko wanawana (You are smart) :-) KRtau16 (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * . Ko I-Banaba? from Rabi Island. If you do like to chat with me about that, I will be pleased of that.-Arorae (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am from Rabi Island (Buakonikai Village), though I haven't been to Banaba. KRtau16 (talk) 09:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * sadly like 95% of the Banabans since 1945.-Arorae (talk) 09:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Sad but it's the reality. I feel bad for my ancestors during those dark times. KRtau16 (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I have created the article Phosphate mining in Banaba and Nauru, so I know this very sad story.-Arorae (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * May I ask as to why you put Arorae as your username? As far as I know it's an island in Kiribati. Just curious. KRtau16 (talk) 08:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * replied by mail.-Arorae (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 16:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
 * Thanks. I will make good use of the tool :-) KRtau16 (talk) 18:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Blake Jenner
You should not have restored this content ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blake_Jenner&diff=977144299&oldid=977143697 your edit). There are no reliable sources that mention Jenner in connection to this incident. This content violates the biographies of living people policy and consists of original research. If you have any doubt about content for a BLP, do not add it. Fortunately, another editor reverted it. Schazjmd  (talk)  12:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I will surely keep that in mind and won't do it again. Hope that this would be my last mistake. Thanks for the reminder. Happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Geo-Political Simulator 4: Power and Revolution moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Geo-Political Simulator 4: Power and Revolution, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok. I will submit the draft if there are enough reliable sources and citations. Thanks and happy editing! KRtau16 (talk) 04:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi KRtau16. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AKRtau16 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thanks. I'll make good use of the tool. KRtau16 (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Respected dear wikipedian
Dear wikipedian KRtau16

Can you please rollback or else copy paste and publish from the below version of oppa Lee min-ho article because the below version is loaded with good pictures and change international fame to worldwide fame because leeminho is popular worldwide nowadays.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Min-ho_(actor)&oldid=981732182

Many Thanks Jenny116.93.120.231 (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ❌ 116.93.120.231: Though some images are own work, it does not provide proof or evidence that the author or the copyright holder agreed to license the file, with one image being nominated for deletion here. Therefore I am being reluctant to add those images to the article. And for your second request, International fame and worldwide fame basically means the same thing. KRtau16 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining very clearly about the images but worldwide fame is global and international means two or three countries. thats why i wanted you to change it anyways no problem... thanks again Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

The success of lee's television series globally established him as a top hallyu star and a global celebrity. could you please include the word global celebrity in the above sentence.it has been mentioned in the lead with scmp source added to it but someone removed it so can you add it thanks again jenny116.93.120.231 (talk) 11:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

lee min ho hailed as the king of social media in korea can you add this to media influence source below

https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/entertainment/2020/06/20/lee-min-ho-is-king-of-social-media-with-65-million-followers  116.93.120.231 (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 116.93.120.231: I think we should stick with International fame because many countries (not all) are mentioned in that sub section and I do not think that he is popular in ALL 195 countries unless you provide me with a reliable source. Thanks. KRtau16 (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again. - through boys over flowers he is popular in Asia-fact

-this scmp source says he is popular in europe continent through city hunter https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3088074/hyun-bin-lee-min-ho-park-seo-joon-and-5-more-korean-drama

-this source says he is popular in African continent currently through TKEM https://ynaija.com/all-you-didnt-know-about-the-lee-min-ho-trend-nigerian-ladies-are-jumping-on/

thus, lee is popular in Asia,Europe and Africa based on above sources he is popular in three continents is more than enough for mentioning worldwide fame or else fame between continents. so please change it

add this sentence in continued success section- On August 6 2020, Studio Dragon announced their financial performance of TKEM over the second quarter on Netflix with a record-breaking US$135 million in total sales.source below http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=20200807MW07423210103

in media influence change to be crowned as the Asian male god to was crowned as the Asian male god since he was the winner and past tense.

Many Thanks Jenny116.93.120.231 (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Anything related to the TKEM should be on that article. However I am going to request another experienced editor to help me on your request. Thanks. KRtau16 (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks I have high hopes you will manage this task you will get some idea from the below version as well how the sources were used

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Min-ho_(actor)&oldid=981752653

Many thanks & regards yours truly Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Continued success section--TKEM is 12th most watched series on Netflix worldwide beating other k-dramas released that year. source below https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/the-king-eternal-monarch-beats-crash-landing-on-you-to-become-most-watched-k-drama-on-netflix-in-2020-yet/ar-BB17v1zQ?li=AAggjDC

Thanks Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 17:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Being the number 12 most watched series on Netflix is from flixpetrol point system calculation, which was deemed unreliable here: Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 297 Also, it was #12 on flixpetrol for days only, this is not the end of year never changing reports/charts. It is #21 now, and is surpassed by another Korean series at #11.

As for the sales report, it is already on the series’ page and is not related here. Plus, the report doesn’t specify this series as solely the reason for the sale increase, accrediting the boost of license sales to multiple works such as Crash Landing on You, The King: Eternal Monarch, and It's Okay to Not Be Okay. CherryPie94 &#x1F352;&#x1f967; (talk) 04:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Is it true that this IP User is a vandal or a troll as this user's edit request was reverted by Explicit on the administrator's talk page here?


 * I’m not sure, we need a user check for that, but if an admin did it it means they know the IP is related but can’t ban it permanently as it is an IP that can change over time. Lee Min-ho’s page did have a high number of sock puppets adding the same things this IP is requesting. See Sockpuppet investigations/Finrell ausi/Archive and [block log]. CherryPie94  &#x1F352;&#x1f967; (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If that's the case please review the edit I made on behalf of this user's request: . KRtau16 (talk) 09:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't know what was happening in Lee Min-ho article. I was going through the history of the lee min ho article to find sources and pasted it suddenly explicit thought me for some one else and blocked me, when I explained him the situation he/she unblocked me. Thanks cherrypie94 for taking time and working on the Lee Min-ho article yours truly Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 11:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 116.93.120.231 If that's the case, why don't you create an account to avoid confusion? KRtau16 (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * is it compulsory i am a rare editor i am sorry i forgot to mention KRtau16 thank you so much for working on the Lee Min-ho article. Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * 116.93.120.231 Actually, for what I can see, Explicit did not unblock you, the duration of the block ran out. CherryPie94  &#x1F352;&#x1f967; (talk) 06:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

miss cherrypie94 why did you remove the poem quotes of lee min ho is there any reason for it its just a beautiful poem quotes by him. please re add thanks once again Jenny 116.93.120.231 (talk) 12:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * 116.93.120.231, Because it is fancruft. A message written to fans serves no purpose on Wikipedia. This is not a fan page. CherryPie94  &#x1F352;&#x1f967; (talk) 06:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
 * Thanks. Happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Reverted by Mistake
Hi, it seems at same time when you were updating Fiji on Template:COVID-19 pandemic data, I was updating for India, so it got misplaced. So, it was unintentional. Sorry for that. - Mayankj429 (talk) 05:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's ok :-) When I checked the time of edit, it was the same as mine so I knew it must be an edit conflict therefore I didn't left a message on your talk page. Nevertheless thanks for your valuable contributions on Wikipedia and happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of wax figures of Lee Min-ho displayed at various places for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wax figures of Lee Min-ho displayed at various places is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of wax figures of Lee Min-ho displayed at various places until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Your participation would be significant as you have edited Lee Min-ho's page before. Thank you.  -ink&amp;fables     «talk»   12:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. Voted Delete. KRtau16 (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Namaste; Thank you for taking time out. That article has been deleted. I am here to inform you about two IP addresses: 116.93.120.17 and 116.93.120.231, these IP addresses are used by, who has been blocked indefinitely for operating more than 25 sockpuppet accounts. So please be extra careful while completing the requests suggest by these IP addresses. Thank you.   -ink&amp;fables     «talk»   03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * . Oh! Thanks for informing me. I'll be extra careful in the future. Since you brought it up, please review the edit I made on behalf of this IP User. Thanks again. KRtau16 (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * it's perfect. If in future, you have confusion regarding reliability of sources for Korea related topics, then follow this:WP:KO/RS. Enjoy editing.   -ink&amp;fables     «talk»   05:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia not Wikinews
Dear friend. As you know, Wikipedia is not Wikinews. The nomination of SG of Pacific Forum, should be cited within Taneti Maamau only if it matters in the political life of te Beretitenti. Wikipedia is not to resume the news and declarations made and reported but only what matters. Gerald Zackios in my point of view, doesn’t matter enough to be included in this article. Not now. History is always on a longer perspective. Try to read the book An History of Kiribati to notice and resume better view on those topics, Tiaboo,--Arorae (talk) 13:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reminding me on policies regarding Wikipedia. I will surely read the book An History of Kiribati. Thanks again and happy editing. Tekeraoi. KRtau16 (talk)
 * I've seen that you haven't removed my edit on Taneti Maamau, should I remove it? KRtau16 (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * you’re right ; I haven’t removed. I was waiting for your point of view. Respectfully -Arorae (talk) 23:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, my opinion says that you are right. When I read it, it does sound like a news. Therefore, please review all my edits I've made there and feel free to correct them. I am happy to take advice from experienced editors as I'm still new here. Ko raba. KRtau16 (talk) 01:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there
Hope you are fine.. could please add this below source in the Lee Min-ho article in the citation needed tag placed in shanghai 2013 lead and also in the career section citation needed tag madame tussauds shanghai thanks http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20120826000290

yours truly jenny from phillipines 116.93.120.17 (talk) 16:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ 116.93.120.17. KRtau16 (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jung Hae-kyun has been accepted
 Jung Hae-kyun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jung_Hae-kyun help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Missvain (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks and happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for welcome message!
Hello, Wikipedia has a nice community. Thank you for the message and advice! Sami270 (talk) 12:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You welcome! Enjoy editing :-) KRtau16 (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi KRtau16. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 22:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello ,



It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to and  who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to, , and who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
 * Year in review

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
 * Reviewer of the Year

As a special recognition and thank you has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
 * NPP Technical Achievement Award

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the lack of citation
Hi, KRtau16 - Vinaka for pointing out the lack of citation in my TC Yasa entry! It's now fixed and cited appropriately. Stay well!Ed1t0r14J (talk) 09:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! :-) KRtau16 (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Greetings
--CyclonicallyDeranged (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you very much for the Christmas wish. A Merry Christmas to you and Australia. Sending love from Fiji. We are a Vuvale (family) as a whole as we share the same ocean. Happy New Year in advance.
 * Happy editing :-) KRtau16 (talk) 08:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy editing :-) KRtau16 (talk) 08:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
''Hello, I'm KRtau16. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hermann Kober, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KRtau16 (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)''

In this case the "source" is direct personal experience and knowledge. I am unsure how that stands in Wikepedia. AAMOF I subsequently saw it referred to, though less specifically, in the existing reference on the Kober page: O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Hermann Kober", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews. 31.125.76.2 (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. In regards to "direct personal experience and knowledge", that is strongly discouraged as per WP:COI. Anyways, I've checked the existing reference and it is indeed mentioned, so apologies for that. I've also restored your edit. KRtau16 (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Geo-Political Simulator 4: Power and Revolution


Hello, KRtau16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geo-Political Simulator 4: Power and Revolution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Tekeraoi am bong ! --Arorae (talk) 22:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank You very much! Happy editing you both! :-) KRtau16 (talk) 11:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. EN - Jungwon  01:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello and thanks for the warning. This is my first time receiving this warning as I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia and I'm sorry for that. Thanks and happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Greetings
Hi KRtau16, it's good to see you again after a hiatus. Was wondering where you were and hope you are well. In the meantime, I updated the first eight days of August for the Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Fiji article. Have also added the Fiji daily reports to Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in August 2021. Cheers. Andykatib 09:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your concern. Been busy with school coping up with the new norm. A huge thanks to you for your continuous work in Wikipedia as evident in your contribution. Happy editing. KRtau16 (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Glad to know that you are well. Wish you all the best at school under the new norm. God bless you. Andykatib 11:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello ,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our  Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but  there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

 * Thanks and much appreciated. Happy editing :-) KRtau16 (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

 * Thank you for the wishes. Happy editing:-) KRtau16 (talk) 07:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Happy belated birthday. Tekeraoi am bong.--Arorae (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ko nang raraba (Thank you so much). Tekeraoi naba. KRtau16 (talk) 04:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently Special:ListUsers/patroller New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi KRtau16. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The Signpost: 29 May 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Data Quality Management System
Thank you very much for your comment. It is very usefull. I added meanwhile several links to other pages. I added also links from other articles to my article. Can you please remove the commment? Greeting, Peter :) Data Quality Management System
 * ✅. Note: Please sign your posts by typing four tildes . KRtau16 (talk) 13:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Pndt (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much!! Pndt (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.
 * Backlog status

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
 * Backlog drive

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
 * TIP – New school articles

There is a new template available,, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
 * Misc

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.


 * Reminders
 * Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
 * If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
 * To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
 * Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

So you support child molesters?
you have no business removing legitimate information about a child sex abuser. 99.155.97.176 (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 99.155.97.176: Well first of all, I am not familiar with Kevin Ranaghan and accusing me of supporting child molesters will not get you anywhere. Unfounded accusations is considered a serious personal attack.
 * As I've already warned you in your talk page, I removed your edit because you added information without a citation to a reliable source. Please read Biographies of living persons for further clarification. KRtau16 (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)