User talk:KUChildrensServices

November 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Ideally this would be backed up by something other than a WP:PRIMARY source, like a newspaper article about the organization rather than the organization's website itself. I also note that the article does specifically say that educational organizations are excluded from this list, so I do not believe that it could be included. Also, Wikipedia is not a place to promote an organization. This might not have been your intent, but this is how it can come across to others. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * In order to be unblocked, please answer those two questions:
 * Do you understand the WP:Conflict of interest policy?
 * Do you understand that every statement inserted into article should be backed by reliable independent secondary sources?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)