User talk:K shad17/sandbox

Peer Review
Hi K shad 17,

Only a small spelling error in the Slut Walk section,; you're missing an "e" in Los Angeles

I like the direction your going with this particular article. The child rape section you'd like to add is unfortunately deeply embedded within rape culture and shouldn't be left unmentioned so I think it's a great idea to contribute that section into the article.

I'm not sure if this statement is too biased and not encyclopedic enough, maybe a citation could help?

"The rape culture regarding children is problematic because states in the U.S. don’t respond to national surveys or claim there is no documentation."

It may seem too opinion-based but I definitely understand the point you're making.

Great uses of sources as well!

Kcueva (talk) 07:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Okay yes I see where you are coming from, and I will change the wording to be more neutral. K shad17 (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
I think you used your sources very well in this article. Everything you added seemed to be from a neutral standpoint. I also agree that adding that new section about adolescents was a good idea! Great Job. KarenKoepp7 (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you I appreciate it! K shad17 (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)