User talk:Ka1iban

---Please excuse my dust---

Some useful shortcuts
Toolbox TOTALLY stolen from Tawker's user page

which all can be found here anyway...

Wikipedia footnotes

tables

citation templates

Wikipedia is not...

No original research...

Manual of Style

Disambiguation

Oh and BTW...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NFT and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLE and don't forget http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information

Rumsfeld
Just a hint - it can be helpful in situations like this to reference existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines, (including insisting that anonymous editors sign their Talk comments with ~ ) and don't feel the need to overexplain yourself if it is clear that the policy is not being followed. This tends to set a professional tone on these discussions, which can help. I dealt with a similar situation recently that took a week or two, but the anonymous editor eventually quieted down and moved on to other things. Since this is not a clear-cut case of vandalism, you might also try posting a summary of the dispute at Mediation Cabal or third opinion. I don't want to get too dragged into it but that might attract some other helpful editors or administrators. Cheers, KWH 07:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thought you might appreciate this; I checked this just on a lark - our friend appears to be coming from an ISP in Germany, and has been trying to add the same stuff continually on German Wikipedia. KWH 05:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hah! That explains his creative phrasing...I honestly don't think I have the strength to get in a big tussle over his edits.  I just wish he'd realize that getting an ID would take him a long way from 'whackjob' to 'contributor'.  Guess I'll put in for arbitration if things get worse.  Thanks for following up on it, though. ka1iban 15:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm going to remove that paragraph. I think we went a long way towards assuming good faith, but it appears that it's original research. Shortly after the paragraph was left in the article, see what shows up on http://www.medienanalyse-international.de/rumsfeld.html -
 * "Entry in Wikipedia "Donald Rumsfeld":
 * Some critics feel that Rumsfeld's responses on the day of the 9/11 attacks (which are outlined in the Pentagon press briefing of Sept. 15, 2001&hellip;"
 * So this person is using Wikipedia to buttress their controversial claims on their own (or good friend's) website, and get traffic. I'm going to wait another day or two and remove the paragraph in question, but I am open to your opinion. KWH 07:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hah! Busted!  Yeah, that's not gonna play.  Book'em, Dano.  Pull the link, too, if it's just OR and personal promotion...ka1iban 14:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * In response to your question "can this guy be reasoned with" - pretty doubtful. I think we've done all we can in good faith, and everything that needs to be explained has been. It's pretty close to clear that this individual's motivation was only to include this claim in the article so they could cite it on their own website. Ignoring it can work. If they decide to put it back in the article themselves, wait a day or two and then remove it. Basically make it more work than it's worth for them to get their way. If they get nutty and start vandalising or breaking 3RR, then they could be easily banned, but that's only temporary and sometimes I like the challenge of getting them to bugger off without that being necessary. KWH 04:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

STA Edits
Hey, I thought I'd just stop by and thank you for the contribution you made to the Saint Thomas Academy page. The section you added seems like a good choice for an edit. (And maybe it'll keep down the random IP address edits Wiki gets to STA's page stating "Mock Trial brings the ruckus" Heh.)Pvt Mahoney 20:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Summit Ave
Ka1iban,

Regarding your tagging my piece on Summit Avenue: Yep, I need to expand it - the stub was a couple of hours old when you tagged it. Work called. I will be adding to it shortly.

Clippings
In recent continuity however, this power has been de-emphasized by writers in favor of the perceptual acuity afforded Daredevil by his superhuman senses, which are represented as giving him a "radar-like" awareness of his surroundings.

Minnesota meetup
A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by the discussion page if interested. Jonathunder 02:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Reminder: Meetup October 29, one o'clock, Mall of America. Jonathunder 16:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Claudiablack9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Claudiablack9.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Minnesota Meetup
 Minnesota Meetup Sunday, 2007-10-07, 1:00 p.m. (13:00) Pracna on Main 117 Main SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota Map Please pass this on! RSVP here.  Spam delivered by Jonathunder 16:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Res Ship Ext.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Res Ship Ext.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zeissbatman.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Zeissbatman.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cylon Resurrection ship
I have nominated Cylon Resurrection ship, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Cylon Resurrection ship. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mango juice talk 16:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CdhLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CdhLogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Minnesota Meetup
 2009 Details under discussion. Please share this with anyone who may be interested.  Jonathunder (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zeiss (comics)


The article Zeiss (comics) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Zeiss (comics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeiss (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zeiss (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)