User talk:Kaabi

Spam in MrAirsoft.com
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MrAirsoft.com, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MrAirsoft.com is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MrAirsoft.com, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate MrAirsoft.com itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Mrairsoft
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mrairsoft, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mrairsoft is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mrairsoft, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Mrairsoft itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Mrairsoft.com
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mrairsoft.com, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mrairsoft.com is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mrairsoft.com, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Mrairsoft.com itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - Rklawton 16:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Real lives
Hi, I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. It could also have been deleted because it was very short and lacked content, and had been deleted by a previous admin as an advert.  Jimfbleak .  Talk to me. 05:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC))

Speedy deletion of "Rick Simpson"
A page you created, Rick Simpson, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. WadeSimMiser (talk) 00:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Run From The Cure
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Run From The Cure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Bsnowball (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It was probably deleted because there didn't seem to be enough info available to make an article, all articles have to meet the criteria in notability, which amounts to enough info from trustworthy sources. What I'd do for now is work on the Rick Simpson article and make sure it meets the specific criteria for biographies (WP:BIO), that would be multiple news reports, inteviews/reveiws of film etc. Note I blanked the talk page because (for copyright reasons) we can't just quote the entire articles. Just pick out relevant bits in summary or as quotes, with references. Blah blah... (yes this place is a little picky about rules;) Good luck & talk me again if need more help.  Misarxist  07:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tony Hancock has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ZX81  talk  04:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - Radtek67 (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Quite. Let's try to avoid any further outbursts of this nature, hm? – Luna Santin  (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Assuming that responses such as this are considered outbursts, of course. ~ Troy (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In response to your last edit (which is really not related to anything I've said or done), let me quote the header, visibly shown on the top of my talk page. It says, "Welcome to my discussion page. Please post new messages to the bottom of the page and use headings when starting new discussion topics" (end quote). ~ Troy (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rick Simpson
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rick Simpson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Rick Simpson. Thank you. LK (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Scream


A tag has been placed on DJ Scream requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. VQuakr (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Medical cannabis. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓ © 03:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
The article Codeacademy has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Codecademy


A tag has been placed on Codecademy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  role player 19:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Refs
Please read WP:MEDRS with respect to sourcing for medical articles. Also WP:MEDHOW can help with formatting. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)