User talk:KabukiStarship

Your submission at Articles for creation: Socket (computer science) (August 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Socket (computer science) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Socket (computer science), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Socket_(computer_science) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CASSIOPEIA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Socket_(computer_science) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Associative array edits
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 185.213.154.172 (talk) 02:56, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wiki associative array.png
Thank you for uploading File:Wiki associative array.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Recommended reading
Please read this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.213.154.172 (talk) 11:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 185.213.154.172 (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

I've imposed this block because of the range of reasons discussed at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents report, but more than anything else because of your completely unfounded claims that other editors are lying about their credentials. Our personal attacks policy specifies that accusations of disruptive behavior must be backed up, and baseless accusations are considered personal attacks. Once this block expires, you're welcome to edit productively, but if you resume the disruption that got you blocked, you will be blocked again, but for a longer period of time. Nyttend (talk) 19:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Socket (computer science) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Socket (computer science), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Understand its futile
I've tried to go against the popular opinion before and realised its a futile effort when brainwashed zombies who are told what to think and not how to think judge themselves to be the arbiteurs of knowledge along with their allied post-modernist 'sources'. Hey, there is just no point complaining to this mob because wikipedia is an unfunny joke. Just about everyone I've spoken to in academia views this organisation (Wikipedia Foundation) with disdain derision. Unless it is STEM (which has minimal to no subjective answers), then anyone with an agenda can edit it (just look up some of the authors here and there). Just about everything that isn't a hard science is basically just leftist mental masturbation. Disregard, disavow, and distance yourself from anything that could be propaganderised. It will do wonders for your mental clarity.

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Great Replacement, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Talkpages aren't soapboxes for promotion of conspiracy theories or for promotion of pet mathematical theories of population change. This seems to be a trend, please stop abusing talkages as fora. Acroterion   (talk)   03:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing from certain pages (Talk:Great Replacement) for Misuse of talk page after warning. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 04:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

And I just read another rant, on Talk:Men's rights movement--I think was being kind in making this a partial block, since what I see is grounds already for a total NOTHERE block. Drmies (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 05:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * thanks. I had only been awake literally 5 minutes and didn't look at the other talk page rants or the block log for their first block. I've reblocked with the block log stating "Noted other political rants at Talk:Men's rights movement‎ and Talk:Mulatto, clearly here with an agenda to "right great wrongs" and also taking into account the reasons for their first block." Doug Weller  talk 05:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Socket (computer science)
Hello, KabukiStarship. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Socket (computer science), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Socket (computer science)


Hello, KabukiStarship. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Socket".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)