User talk:Kabulbuddha

Democracticly-elected issues
You might pay attention to ANI and make sure this is addressed. You might also contact User:Nathan_Johnson, who 'closed' the rfc, and help him understand the unanticipated consequences of his words. --HectorMoffet (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * All that is needed is a consensus amongst editors to use the phrase democratically elected,just need to start a section on the talk page and get votes for that term once that is done then the term can be used. That is what the rfc says.Kabulbuddha (talk) 19:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not involved in that page.  I only got involved when the 40 other pages got mass-deleted and then mass-reverted.   --HectorMoffet (talk)

You've got mail!
' Ankh '. Morpork  21:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not know what the purpose of this notice is as I have no email address registered so the chances of you sending me an email would be slim to none. Maybe you would like to explain this notice to me. Thanks.Kabulbuddha (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing
Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, citing a tabloid citing a private letter, is not a reliable source for something that would have many sources if it were true. Pilger's claims did not hold up in court. I've tagged the source on the grounds that it is not a historical book by a Cambodian scholar. Nic Dunlop actually is such a scholar, so please replace Operation Gladio with his book.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The Guardian is not a tabloid at all,I guess you have never read it or seen one.The book is an academic source and it is relating a story printed in the Guardian a reputable UK newspaper and you are edit waring,which you have done a few times now and I am not going to stand for it.I suggest you revert it back now.Kabulbuddha (talk) 01:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)