User talk:Kabulwu

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:


 * First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
 * When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
 * Remember to use a neutral point of view!
 * If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:


 * Policy Library
 * Utilities
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Conflict resolution
 * Brilliant prose
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Village pump
 * Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkTroll 23:13, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Observatory
Sorry, my mistake. I meant to move it to Cincinnatti Observatory (right spelling, capital O, capital C), but committed a typo. Thanks for catching that--I'll move it now. If you catch another typo, you can feel free to correct it yourself--we appreciate it when you're bold in editing! Best wishes, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 02:31, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

Women's studies
You ask on Talk:Women's studies, "Why is more than half the article devoted to criticisms of Women's Studies, and why so many critical entries in 'Further Reading'? Seems blatantly one-sided." Assuming that the question is not just rhetorical, the answer seems to be simple: because someone (or more than one someone) hostile to women's studies has taken the time to write some dubious, opinionated content, and because no one more sympathetic to the field has made it a priority to write what should be the core of the article. Feel more than free to be the one to remedy this.

By the way, when adding your comments to a talk page, the tradition here is to add them to the bottom. Since we archive talk from the top, putting your coments at the top may mean that they are gone before much anyone sees them. I've moved your comment down. - Jmabel | Talk 17:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)