User talk:Kackem/Kariba Dam

One error I saw was in the first source at the bottom, it looks like there is something wrong with the title for it. Other than that I think the additions are pretty good. The sources used are public access so there will be no trouble accessing them and I like how you incorporated them into the article. JakeBrooks2 (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

peer review
The article is very informative and is written from a neutral viewpoint. The section added is a good way to improve the article because it adds recent and important information to know. It is well written and easy to understand and there are no spelling errors. The only thing I would say to improve is to fix the first reference since it has a red error alert. Great article! Giacorbett (talk) 06:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)