User talk:Kacper99jed

Hi, I just need to know wether my article will be able to stay on Wikipedia, as I wish to send someone the link, but I can't because I don't know if it still stay there...
 * See The answer to life, the universe, and everything. If you can find and include 3~5 independent in-depth reliable sources about the subjects, then you may be able to submit them. Do not include advertisements, blogs, directory listings, forums, interviews, its own website(s), partnered organizations, press releases, quotes, social media, or (unless these are hosted by news agencies on their own site) YouTube videos. Dru of Id (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi again. Why do other articles have their own website URL' s and partnered organizations?
 * They can have those, but they also need to have references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?


 * Read WP:Your first article for useful advice.


 * Two tips: add new entries at the bottom of talk pages; and on talk pages (but not in articles) sign your entries by ending them with a group of four "tilde" characters  which the system will convert to a "signature" with your username and the time and date, like this: JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * And more: You can't be a reference in your article - nor can 'people' of any sort. It has to be publications - online or print - so that someone can verify things. When you give a reference, it's no good just saying weebly or Daily Telegraph. You have to be specific. Think of it like this - you know how big the Bible is. If you refer to something in there, and just put 'The Bible', it's going to take longer than anyone will spend to find the verse they need. You need 'chapter and verse' for references. (It's no good referring to weebly anyway BTW, as it's not a reliable independent source.) While things last a longish time at Articles for Creation (unless they are certain types like attack, copyright violation or spam), I'm sorry to say that I can't really see this making it as a full article. A two man voluntary outfit fairly newly formed is unlikely to find references that pass WP:RS to prove notability under WP:CORP or WP:GROUP. This doesn't mean you're not doing a good job. It just means no-one's taking much notice yet. Keep up the good work - a lot of big organisations started like you. Apple started in a garage... Peridon (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Another good read is WP:PRIMER. Peridon (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Kacper99jed (talk) 18:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SilvaSPCA (October 15)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- t  numbermaniac  c  02:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceelay Awards concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceelay Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SilvaSPCA concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SilvaSPCA, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceelay Awards


Hello Kacper99jed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ceelay Awards".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SilvaSPCA


Hello Kacper99jed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SilvaSPCA".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)