User talk:Kadalkidal

License tagging for Image:DSC01252.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01252.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Arctic Monkeys EMI deal
I had a look at the image you have uploaded - the copyright to the songs is held by Domino Records and EMI just act as the distributing company in markets where Domino has no presence. In the UK and USA, Domino do not need a distributing company, and so EMI is not featured. Futhermore, it looks to me like your CD is unofficial / an illegal copy, as a) the writing quality is poor, and b) it is apparently in a "2 CD" jewel case, which is not possible given it is a single CD.

The EMI deal referred to in the next is regarding the band signing exclusively for EMI in non-UK markets. EMI are purely acting as a distributing arm, not the band's recording label.

Regards, DJR (Talk) 11:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * First of all, I'm a bad photographer, sorry bout that, but those CD are original! i'll post some more picture to proof it in the future. The cd case is a single 1! You should see it in the top right corner. If EMI are acting as a distributing arms for Domino Records, i think you should mention it in the main page, as it was very relevant to the EMI deal rumour.
 * thx..

Not a problem - the number in the top right corner appeared to be a "2" at first glance - in the UK it only says a number if it is a "2" so I guess my eyes are trained to see a two if I see anything. I have used the EMI link you provided as a source in several areas of the article, and have clarified the details of acting as a publishing label. Regards, DJR (Talk) 13:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)