User talk:Kade Greer/sandbox

Clarasreese (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)== Peer Review ==

A lead section that is easy to understand Clear structure. Balanced coverage. Neutral content. Reliable sources.

Looking at the lead by itself, I do not feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic; however, based on the lead I have a strong and clear definition of the topic "skylights." The lead does select the most important information of the article by offering a concise definition. This lead does not give more weight to any part of the article nor is it redundant information.

The sections of this article are organized in a sensible order, and I do not believe presenting them in any other order would add to the quality of the article.

Each section's length is equal to its importance, with the description section acting as the longest. No section seems unnecessary or off topic. As I am not well versed in published literature regarding the skylight, I am not sure if this article reflects all perspectives represented in said literature. I do not believe that any significant viewpoints are missing or have been omitted from the article. The information in this article is presented in a neutral and unbiased manner. I could not guess the perspective of the author based on the information in the article, they do not make claims on behalf of any group of people named or named.

Most statements in the article are connected to reliable sources, and with seven different sources the article appears to be well balanced.

Clarasreese (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC) Clara S. Reese