User talk:Kahastok/Archive 7

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

List of nations
Please put List of nations on your watch list. I though it had been settled but Mat Lewis clearly does not a he waited a year and then changed the redirect. -- PBS (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Got it. Thanks. Pfainuk talk 10:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for reverting personal attack on my talk page! — Zhernovoi (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem. Pfainuk talk 17:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Wikipedia:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units
An article that you have been involved in editing, Wikipedia:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Martinvl (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories
I hope you don't mind my removing categories from a subpage of yours, as categories shouldn't populate such pages. Best, Verbal chat  17:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough - if they don't belong they don't belong. I've requested the page be speedied anyway because I'd forgotten I had it. Pfainuk talk 17:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BCAFL team
Template:BCAFL team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Pit-yacker (talk) 16:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Falklands Units
What to do? The situation can't be allowed to continue where one editor is effectively vetoing everything unless he gets his way. Justin talk 18:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I think we have a fairly strong case for non-unanimous consensus here. Goodness knows we've tried to get his agreement.  And it would be going by his word: he said he wouldn't contest WP:FALKLANDSUNITS if no-one else did - and notably, no-one else did.  Also notably, he's only actually opposed on procedural grounds (that he doesn't think we'll keep up our end of the bargain) - not on grounds of substance (that there's something wrong with the proposal).


 * If you agree with my feeling that there is actually non-unanimous consensus, then the next job is to start changing articles - which I don't mind starting on tomorrow. I figure on going down the importance scale, obviously excluding any that are clearly more connected to some other project.


 * On the consistency rule, last time around I only applied it where we were actually using (say) distance and area in the same paragraph. The rule is, if a metric measure is "significantly inconsistent" with an imperial one, use imperial for both, and then continue using imperial for that context in the rest of the article (for internal consistency).  In practice, this generally means that all land areas in an article go imperial if one of them happens to be in the same paragraph as a distance - and not much else. Pfainuk talk 21:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * OK I have kinda suggested we just go ahead and ignore him, I can make a low key start as I have a lot of commitments at the moment. Would it not be better to work to the weekend.  Justin talk 21:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Might be easier, yeah. Let's start at the weekend then. Pfainuk talk 06:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)


 * OK no worries, btw seen his latest love note? Justin talk 08:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah. He's run out of arguments, methinks. Pfainuk talk 18:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit-summaries and WP:CIVILITY
Pfainuk, I really don't want to get entangled in this dispute, but the "cleaning up Michael's mess" summaries are likely to cause offence. Will you please moderate these messages? Tony  (talk)  03:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)


 * If positions were reversed, would you say the same to Michael? Of course not.  Please don't try and set yourself up as a neutral observer here - we all know you're not and it doesn't help anyone. Pfainuk talk 09:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

3RR
No I had no intention of edit warring but I wasn't prepared to allow a racist epithet to remain in that article. Justin talk 19:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Pfainuk talk 19:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

sovereign states sorting criteria
Sorry to bother here, but as you are a contributor to certain discussions at the List of sovereign states I would like to show you the recently compiled list of all proposals for sorting criteria so that you can express your opinion here. Thanks! Alinor (talk) 13:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

3RR?
hi Pfainuk,

thank you for warning, but read here. --Keysanger 15:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image you created was promoted to VAlued picture

 * Thanks! Pfainuk talk 17:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

POV Pusher?
I would appreciate an explanation for this accusation. I also recommend you discuss this in the Talk Page instead of reverting a referenced edition. JCRB (talk) 09:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Simple. You do nothing on Wikipedia but push a pro-Spanish and apparently now a pro-Argentine POV.  You are a POV pusher. Pfainuk talk 17:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification
A proposal to change the layout and sorting criteria of the article List of sovereign states has been finalised and submitted for consensus.

As you were previously involved in the discussion for this change, I thought I would inform you of the final proposal. Please provide comments here.  Night  w   13:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

RFM
I've opened up a WP:RFM for List of sovereign states at Requests for mediation/List of sovereign states. Please indicate whether you agree or don't agree to mediation there. TDL (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

AN/I
Thanks for the heads up but for information I'm avoiding the article for the moment. Kind of a lame dispute, when a cool calm discussion could easily have resolved it. Justin talk 23:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Pfainuk talk 23:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

ARBCOM

 * Please see this addendum placed on the talk page. I want to make sure everyone sees and is aware of it. JodyBtalk 14:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

List of countries by population - Sovereign states or countries?
Hello, I've started a discussion on List of countries by population (talk page) that I thought you might be interested in joining. Thanks. Zarcadia (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

neologism
Hi Pfainuk,

There is an interesting discussion in Talk:Falklands_War and I would like to know your opinion about. --Keysanger 20:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Name Change & Territorial Waters
For info, changed it because I was fed up with prats making stupid jokes. Found an interesting article on the legality in International Law of Spain denying territorial waters to Gibraltar. The guys blog is here, you speak a little Spanish don't you? Very interesting reading. Wee Curry Monster talk 22:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

List of states with limited recognition at FLRC
nominated List of states with limited recognition for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.  Night  w   15:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Sock?
You don't think this could be Vintagekits or Alex do you? Maybe I'm getting paranoid? Wee Curry Monster talk 22:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Forget it, the contribution history is not comparable. Put it down to paranoia.  Wee Curry Monster talk 22:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Pfainuk for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * If I were you I'd be deeply offended that someone thought you were me. Wee Curry Monster talk 14:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

AE Courtesy Note
This is a courtesy note to let you know that you have been mentioned by name at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement and a proposed user conduct solution has been posted. No action has been suggested against you. Vassyana (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement

Gibraltar Discretionary Sanctions
This is a courtesy note to inform you that articles and discussions about Gibraltar or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar are subject to a discretionary sanctions remedy. Please see Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar. You are being notified per the actions logged here. Any disruptive, uncivil, or generally problematic conduct may lead to discretionary sanctions imposed by an administrator. This warning is not an indication of any wrong doing on your part. It is simply a general notice to recent editors in the topic area. Thank you for understanding. Vassyana (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Gibraltar
I sense you're tired, pissed off and frustrated. Not the best frame of mind to be editing. Stop, take 24hrs and don't respond to needling. Yes? Wee Curry Monster talk 22:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Gibraltar
I have provided a warning about discussion participation at Talk:Gibraltar. This is to ensure you have been explicitly notified. This note does not indicate any wrongdoing on your part. I am sending it to all talk page participants with the past 72 hours.

As a recent participant, I explicitly invite you to join in the discussion that I have started at Talk:Gibraltar. Discussions on the talk page are going around in old circles. I am trying to help break that pattern and get the discussion focused. I look forward to your contributions in helping improve the article. --Vassyana (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Falkland Islands. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MFIreland (talk • contribs) 14:20, 22 December 2010


 * Uh-huh. The template refers to a dispute that does not appear to exist.  As you have been told multiple times by multiple editors, you can't template the article when there is no dispute mentioned on talk. Pfainuk talk 15:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

time to sort out the icesave / debt repayment / loan agreement dispute finally
hey there, this is just a bulk message inviting you to re-think the topic as was discussed more than 6 months ago and is still unresolved. feel free to jump here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Icelandic_debt_repayment_referendum,_2010#Time_to_settle_the_title_dispute.3F and help figure out how we can end this conclusively this time. --Lotsofmagnets (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Gibraltarian
He did it again, I can't revert at the moment or I would have done it. Wee Curry Monster talk 21:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Got it. Thanks. Pfainuk talk 21:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Moving forward on Gibraltar
I make a proposal for a process and conditions to move forward. You are invited to share your thoughts and participate in the discussion. Cheers! --Vassyana (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Gibraltar

Gibraltar medcab update
With all the preliminaries out of the way, the mediation cabal case you are involved in will now get underway. The first issues for substantive discussion is posted on the bottom of the talk page. I ask that you watch the page to keep up to date with other parties' responses. Cheers! Lord Roem (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)