User talk:Kaiser262

October 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  Agüeybaná  23:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  Agüeybaná  00:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing in Wikipedia for violating the 3 revert rule in the article "Puerto Rican flag". Let me remind you that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on verifiable facts and not a political forum. Thank you. Tony the Marine 01:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

PRSSA/PR Flag
Thanks for noting my contributions to the PRSSA/AEEEU page. I was particularly concerned at unidentified third parties doing translations that resulted in incorrect information appearing in the page of an organization that has produced so many good Puerto Ricans as the current Resident Commissioner, the Senate president and the former Attorney General Pierluisi.

Changing the subject, the color of the Puerto Rico flag triangle was not set in the PR Constitution. What the Constitution states is that matters pertaining to the PR flag (as well as coat-of-arms and anthem) shall be regulated by law and that any future amendments will not take effect until one year after the subsequent general election. As a matter of fact, there are different views as to the correct color, to the point where the flag in the House of Representatives is a darker blue than that in the Senate, both NPP-ruled legislative bodies. I once heard the Senate President explain that he preferred the "historically correct" lighter shade. The PR flag used the same colors as the Cuban flag of the late 1800's. Once Cuba became independent and started flying its flag on the high seas, the light blue stripes did not contrast enough with the light blue of the ocean and the sky, the flag appearing to simply be a red triangle from a distance, and Cuban then switched to "navy blue" stripes, but the original color copied from the Cuban stripes to the Puerto Rican triangle was the light "Penepé" Blue! To each his own! Pr4ever (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Just ran across the set of the Senate President/House Speaker response to the Governor's State of the "Commonwealth" message last week, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWJ75ugAr0k, see the color of the PR flag. As I said, there's no unanimity among statehooders regarding this issue.Pr4ever (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Improving PRSSA article
Given your interest in the PRSSA article, I suggest you search for additional reliable third-party references that will substantiate some of the facts contained in the article to protect it from being removed. I've been doing what I can. Good luck! Pr4ever (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Someone with access to ADENDI might want to check whether their digital files go as far back as 1980 when there were several good articles featuring MacClintock, Fortuno, post-election interviews and Paul Simon's speech at AEEEU's first convention. Pr4ever (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Kaiser262! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ramón Luis Rivera Jr. -
 * 2) Charlie Rodríguez -
 * 3) Jorge Santini -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Kevin McClintock
I found this in my new pages feed. I added some maintenance tags and they should not be removed by you, but other editors/contributors once the issues are corrected.

If you are writing this article about yourself, please note: creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If the article not about yourself, please provide sufficient information with cited sources and references and make sure the person meets Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines

If you have any questions or need to discuss it with me, please do it By clicking Here.--Ericf505 (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin McClintock


A tag has been placed on Kevin McClintock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ericf505 (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin McClintock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin McClintock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin McClintock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agt x 16:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Statehood movement in Puerto Rico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Progressive Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Kaiser262

Thank you for creating Proyecto Estrella.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 DOOMSDAYER 520 &#124; TALK &#124; CONTRIBS 21:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your undiscussed move of Proyecto Estrella
Hello Kaiser. I asked the admins to undo your recent "move" of Proyecto Estrella to Puerto Rico Star Project because you moved the page without discussing and reaching consensus first. As this is your second attempt to change the name of the page, please know that any further attempts may result in the page being move-locked and/or a block put on your account to prevent you from further moving the page. If you have reasons to move the page, you should start a discussion at teh article's Talk Page, giving your reasons why you believe the article should be renamed in English.

In addition, I would suggest you consider adding reliable sources to the article that directly and unequivocally demonstrate the organization is notable. As shown elsewhere in this Talk Page, the notbaility of the organization has been brought into question before by other editors and failure to shown notability may result in the entire article being deleted from the encyclopedia.

Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Young Republican Federation of Puerto Rico


The article Young Republican Federation of Puerto Rico has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Proyecto Estrella for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proyecto Estrella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Proyecto Estrella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercy11 (talk) 01:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)