User talk:Kaiwen1

Oswax
Hi! Thanks for the comments on my talk. I read your userpage, and look forward to working with you on the Liber Linteus. Very few people know anything about this, so it would be good to have another person look it over. I've been working a little to get up to a better standard. Pictures are something that would be great! Oswax 16:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Life comments
I added some comments to your discussion on Life. 71.65.54.92 05:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

AIS
There was a quite a bit in your AIS atricle that is not in Automatic Identification System. I hope you will copy stuff over. -- RHaworth 20:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Age of Consent
Hi, thanks for your edits on the AoC page. However, the link to Interpol has been discussed before. Their website has been found to be out of date in many respects. Also, alphabetising the list has also been discussed before. It was decided that it was more manageable in regional order. The discussion concluded with this statement: "Reorganizing the list alphabetically would of course make it easier to find a single country that one might want to search for in the list, not unlike thumbing through the yellow pages. But if you just want to browse randomly, the geographical ordering by continent seems more logical, and so I don't agree that the strictly alphabetical order is necessarily more user friendly." This was some time ago. The whole point is possibly moot however because the entire AoC page is undergoing a rewrite and restructure. If you want to join in on the project drop by the talk page. Cheers! --Monotonehell 04:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Redirects
Just so you know, when you want to redirect a page (when you want something to a "see such and such") instead of keeping two articles the syntax #REDIRECT page name here is the accepted syntax. You got the bot auto warning because the redirect didn't match the pattern, I know its good faith and I've fixed it for you. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message :) -- Tawker 07:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC) -- Tawker 21:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And I see you've already fixed it, cheers :) -- Tawker 21:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Truth in Advertising
Hi Kaiwen1. This comment was originally in a section on your voting page re: anonymous edits, but was removed by Canderra for reasons which mystify me. I add it here only because I worry that due to its removal you might not have had a chance to read it. I only put it there originally because I hadn't figured out how to reach your user page here.


 * I've already gone into my reasons for supporting anonymous editing above, so I won't belabor the point. I would like to simply state that if this change is adopted by Wikipedia, it will invalidate the motto of "the encyclopedia anyone can edit", since some people for technical reasons can only edit anonymously.


 * This being the case, I would like to respectfully request that if the result of the straw poll is to support your intention, that when you forward the report to the Wikimedia board, that you include a recommendation that for purposes of remaining honest and preserving Wikipedia's credibility, that the motto phrase "anyone can edit" be struck from the main page, as it will no longer apply. Please, inform me on my talk page when you're ready to forward your results, Kaiwen1; I'm very interested in keeping abreast of developments.


 * Cheers,

Kasreyn 03:48, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Anonymous editing
What about "digging" page User:Kaiwen1/Vote_to_prohibit_anonymous_edits to get more votes? --The NeveR SLeePiNG 17:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Mail Order Brides
Hi Gavin, I've submitted the dispute about edits on mail-order bride to the Mediation Cabal here. I thought it might help to get another opinion. --The Famous Movie Director 00:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I've now begun drafting a user RfC against ; it's User:The_Famous_Movie_Director/Draft_RfC_on_. To make it into a stronger case when it is submitted to mediation, please help edit it and add evidence about the problem and how you've helped try to solve it. There has been little discussion between the editors involved in this dispute, so it's difficult for any one person to do it alone. I'd really appreciate your help--I hope one day we can get this article up to a much higher standard. --Grace 02:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

RfC
Hi Gavin. Having finished my exams for the semester, I finally got around to submitting the RfC against Sorry it took so long. The page is at Requests_for_comment/. Please edit it to add any other evidence you want to add, and sign the "Users certifying the basis for this dispute" section, since you were one of those who tried and failed to resolve the dispute. Thanks! --Grace 23:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Anon editing poll
Perhaps time to retire this? It doesn't seem to be generating anything constructive, rather it's basically a series of votes for strongly held positions which are then somewhat aggressively responded to by people voting the other way. --bainer (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made to The Maxims of Ptahhotep
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Kaiwen1! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 01:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Tilera
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tilera, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tilera seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tilera, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Please provide links to news coverage of this company; there were no sources and no claims to notability for the company. Carlossuarez46 00:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see my suggestion in Talk:Tilera. Feel free to chime in with your thoughts ... richi 01:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. bd_ 01:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and important ongoing discussion
Kaiwen, see my User page, hidden though it is—un-gray by clicking on Edit tab—to see who I am. Concerning the future direction of the Natural Products article, see Class section and beyond—in a current sorry state, and avoided for its current structure and constraints. See developing discussion at. Perhaps you have a view to express. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=611512491 your edit] to Kidapawan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * amp;Itemid=50 Mindanews - Kidapawan prepares for Fruit Festival] celebrates the fruit harvest.  The city purchases large quantities of local fruit which is laid

Copyright problem on Phou Den Din National Protected Area
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.namha-npa.org/npa_in_laos/1_Phou_Daen_Din.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Cerebras moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cerebras, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cerebras (November 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cerebras and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cerebras, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cerebras Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cerebras reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cerebras
Hello, Kaiwen1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cerebras, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

September 2023
Your edit to PQXDH has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PQXDH


The article PQXDH has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Classic WP:TOOSOON. New thing might be big someday, but there aren't the sources right now."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)