User talk:Kaizenify/Archive 9

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Kaizenify. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ommo Clark, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID. Thank you. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Winged Blades of Godric, thank you for your message but I think there might be a mix-up here. I didn’t create the page Ommo Clark, i only added the correct link to her website on the page and that doesn’t warrant a conflict of interest clause. Please do check again and revert appropriately. Thanks. Kaizenify (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Re Zoe Charlton
Dear, A few moments ago I patrolled your article Zoe Charlton. The page curation tool shows that there is a copyvio. When checked the Earwig's tool says, 50.6% violation, and content appears to be copied from [this link]. I am not able to see whether this content is free or not? Could you please re-phrase the content in article. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Thanks from WikiProject Articles for Creation!
Thank you for participating in the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. We hope to see you again next time! On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Care to Explain?
Can you explain this action? Although already remedied accurately by as they sent the article back to draft see here my concerns are as follows; at first you accepted the article which is on a non notable entity at AFC, then proceeded to do this, which, for a lack of better word to describe this action is just “off” if the article had notability concerns as well as the optimization of unreliable sources, why then did you accept the article in the first place? Do you mind sharing with me why you accepted a promotional article on a non notable person? Celestina007 (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I left Kaizenify a similar question at the time, and they provided an explanation. See . They, as seems to be their way. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @, They seem to manually remove entirely all entries I presume they do not like from their tp. I’m awaiting their response on this very action of theirs. Celestina007 (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I have assumed good faith and waited patiently for a response, six days have passed now since I originally asked you to explain your reason for accepting a promotional article via AFC, Despite your reluctance to WP:COMMUNICATE. I would like to assume good faith and overlook this as an “error”. I am also pinging  to this discussion so they are aware you are making inappropriate “accepts” at AFC. If I note more of such mistakes in the future I am left with no other choice than to file an official report at ANI. Celestina007 (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Nomination of David Lanre Messan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lanre Messan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Lanre Messan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Drmies (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging