User talk:Kaj Taj Mahal

  
 * Put new text under old text. [ Click here to start a new topic].
 * Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes.
 * New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask answers, get questions.
 * Be polite, and welcoming to new users
 * Assume good faith
 * Avoid personal attacks
 * For disputes, seek dispute resolution

Welcome!
Hello, Kaj Taj Mahal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Lexein (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Xchat
Your edit summary at this edit, "no one cares" was pretty rude to whoever you were addressing, and uninformative to other editors. I should know, I'm guilty of doing the same thing too often. Please read WP:Edit summaries and WP:Civility. Summaries are best when they communicate reasoned action. Consider "rm, unsourced", or even, "unsourced & trivial: minor OS". It's best to keep argument and opinion out of noncontroversial deletions. That is, don't provoke. If you've read this far, thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. --Lexein (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

See WP:BLP
Hi, I rolled back your addition at the talk page for List of Scientists Opposing, etc, due to inflammatory language denigrating people. I don't particularly care for those guys' writings myself, but still we have to follow WP:BLP. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Your talk page comments, along with your !vote at the AfD, seemed a little like trolling. It would be helpful to keep the sarcasm to a minimum.- MrX 21:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement warning: Climate change
As discussed in the arbitration enforcement request concerning you, your edits to have violate Wikipedia's rules of conduct. By adding material such as "He maintains that the Anthropogenic climate change is a "scam",[ref] despite both its wide acceptance in the scientific community, and having no scientific qualifications himself to make this accusation", you have engaged in inappropriate editorializing and violated the WP:BLP and WP:NPOV policies by expressing in Wikipedia's voice and without references the opinion that this person has "no scientific qualifications", which is derogatory. If you repeat similar conduct, you are likely to be banned from editing articles in this topic area.  Sandstein  08:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

BLP
Friendly suggestion: BLP applies everywhere (not just articles). You'll soon be told this in a much less friendly way. I suggest striking "mental midget" where you've written it. Again, I don't say this to cause you trouble, but to try to help. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 01:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem. But even comments like "inferior" are very likely to bring you trouble. (Not that I'm disagreeing…)  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Note that Editor Review has been retired
Hi, Kaj Taj Mahal: this is a notice that after a MfD and two RfCs, the Editor Review process has been officially retired. You should not expect further comments on your open Editor Review, which will be archived soon. In the coming weeks there may be information available on alternative processes that you can pursue if you so desire. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 21:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Theresa May
She is not currently the Prime Minister. Stating that she is, is inaccurate. By all means edit the article once she becomes Prime Minister but doing so beforehand is inaccurate. As I have reverted two of your edits I suggest if you wish to debate this, then take it to the Talk page of the article. Calvin (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

WARNING: Please ensure accuracy when editing pages. She is the Prime Minister, and was officially for 40 seconds before you edited it. Editing in ignorance leads to inaccurate articles, which we don't want here on Wikipedia. Thedamneditor (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Also, the edit you made which had Jeremy Heywood as Acting PM was innacurate. The UK has no such position, as explained in entertaining narrative format here:http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ah-vignette-come-back.368378/ 125.237.174.161 (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

April 2021
Your recent editing history at Derek Chauvin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

For Kaj Taj Mahal: Three times now, you have pushed to add "convicted murderer" to the lead on that article, as seen here:  1st, 2nd, 3rd. There is a relevant Talk Page discussion going on about that right now at this location: Talk:Derek Chauvin. Instead of reverting again (and violating the 3RR rule), join in the discussion there. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk)