User talk:KakCheshtha

Welcome!
Hello, KakCheshtha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Narayana. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Kudos! Excellent editing on Polycystic ovary syndrome
Hi KakChestha; Went to the Polycystic ovary syndrome article to edit, and noticed your extensive improvement of the information. Your edits are excellent, and are generally very beneficial to the article, and for that reason, I declined to alter any of the text; you are on a good path, and multiple hands can interrupt that, even if well-intentioned. I did notice, however, that, while you and I may have no problem reading some of those edits, since you obviously have no problem with scientific and medical jargon, the average reader is NOT a scientist, and that reader is the "audience" for Wikipedia might need information to be worded in a less technical manner. Still, keep up the good work; did not want to interrupt your flurry of good editing. --Anonymous209.6 (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Anonymous209.6 for the encouragement!! I will try to make my edits sound less technical. KakCheshtha (talk) 12:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks WhatamIdoing for the Barnstar!! I was really touched that you took the time out for appreciating me. Sorry, for the late response, I just returned to wikipedia. I will definitely try to help with other medicine-related articles. KakCheshtha (talk) 13:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, and welcome back! WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Jolly LLB
Your addition to Jolly LLB has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: 666 Park Avenue
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 666 Park Avenue, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.sidereel.com/666_park_avenue/season-1/episode-13, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:666 Park Avenue and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 666 Park Avenue, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:666 Park Avenue with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:666 Park Avenue. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:666 Park Avenue saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Polycystic ovary syndrome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Polycystic ovary syndrome, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://books.google.de/books?id=bpn1u9hziVgC&pg=PA4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/256806-workup#showall, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Polycystic ovary syndrome and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Polycystic ovary syndrome, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Polycystic ovary syndrome with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Polycystic ovary syndrome. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Polycystic ovary syndrome saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Exact concerns
In these edits you added
 * 1) "Despite the heterogeneity in  symptoms  associated  with PCOS, the essential feature is arrested follicular development at the stage when selection of the dominant follicle should normally occur." and ref states "Despite the heterogeneity  of  the  symptoms  associated  with PCOS, the essential feature is arrested follicular development at the stage when selection of the dominant follicle should normally occur"
 * 2) "Androgen excess can be tested by measuring total and free testosterone levels. Other androgens, such as DHEA-S, may be normal or slightly above the normal range in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) while levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) are usually low in patients with PCOS. Androstenedione levels are also elevated in women with PCOS. This androgen precursor is 60% ovarian and 40% adrenal in derivation." and ref states "Androgen excess can be tested by measuring total and free testosterone levels or a free androgen index. An elevated free testosterone level is a sensitive indicator of androgen excess. Other androgens, such as dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), may be normal or slightly above the normal range in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) are usually low in patients with PCOS. Androstenedione levels are also elevated in women with PCOS. This androgen precursor is 60% ovarian and 40% adrenal in derivation."

So I have reverted all your edits to the page in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Varna (Hinduism)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Varna (Hinduism), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.iep.utm.edu/hindu-ph/#SSH1a.iv http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/98395/caste http://www.archive.org/stream/purushasukta00unkngoog/purushasukta00unkngoog_djvu.txt, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Varna (Hinduism) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Varna (Hinduism), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Varna (Hinduism) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Varna (Hinduism). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Varna (Hinduism) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Buddhism and Hinduism
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Buddhism and Hinduism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.iep.utm.edu/hindu-ph/#SSH1a.iv, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Buddhism and Hinduism and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Buddhism and Hinduism, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Buddhism and Hinduism with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Buddhism and Hinduism. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Buddhism and Hinduism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Narayana
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Narayana, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://nitaaiveda.com/All_Scriptures_By_Acharyas/Upanishads/Sri_Narayana_Upanisad_Of_the_Krsna_Yajur_Veda.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Narayana and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Narayana, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Narayana with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Narayana. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Narayana saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please do not remove the copyvio template from articles, as you did with 666 Park Avenue. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:666 Park Avenue/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You should have checked the date the website was created before templating established users. Check the website date, it was created after I wrote the content on wikipedia. I have replied at Copyright problems/2013 March 27. Stop edit warring. --KakCheshtha (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Every single one of your substantial contributions appears to have been copied verbatim or closely paraphrased from non-free sources on the web—I suspect that editors will give very little credibility to your claim of authorship in this case. If you have evidence supporting it please post it at Copyright problems/2013 March 27.  Regardless, you shouldn't remove the copyvio template from the article; it states quite clearly that only an administrator or copyright clerk may do so. Removing the template is considered vandalism and you will be blocked if you continue to do so.  —Psychonaut (talk) 09:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It will take some time for me to go through all your claims (I am a busy person). But, in this case you are clearly wrong. You still haven't checked the date the website was created. You don't seem to know about copyright violations and how other websites copy from wikipedia WP:CIRCULAR. Please stick to WP:AGF. As far as removing template goes, when somebody is so obviously wrong WP:IAR applies. --KakCheshtha (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If I'm "clearly" wrong and reverse copying has occurred, then you should have no problem providing evidence of this, and the matter will be dealt with swiftly at Copyright problems. In the meantime please don't attempt to subvert the normal investigation process. Thanks! —Psychonaut (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The webpage was created after I added content to wikipedia. The burden is on you to show why you are right. Other than the assumption of bad faith, I don't see any reasonable argument here. Thanks!!--KakCheshtha (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * There is definite copyright infringement at the PCOS article as I have described above. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Addressing paraphrasing issues
Hi. I'm the admin who handled the copyright listings at Copyright problems/2013 March 27. I did see some substantial issues in articles, but investigation suggests that the TV episode summary was copied from you rather than the other way around. I wanted to let you know that and also to encourage you not to stop contributing. I realize that something like this must be extremely disheartening - I'd certainly be dismayed to discover that I had been violating a policy without realizing it - but it happens, and it is happened to some of our most active and prominent editors. If you're still interested in helping out (and I hope you will be, since I know how important Wikipedia is to readers around the world), it is something that can be overcome. It's simply a matter of learning how sources are used under our local rules. Close paraphrasing is the best guide we have. Basically, we can't copy any text from our sources except in brief and clearly marked quotations unless we can prove that the source is public domain or compatibly licensed, and then we have to acknowledge that the material is copied. Otherwise, we have to accurately restate everything in our own words. (We even have to be careful sometimes with using the structure of our sources - you can change every word and still violate copyright under the U.S. law we have to follow. But the essay I link talks about how to avoid that, too.)

Anyway, it's obvious that you were working with the best of intentions, and I'm very sorry that you suffered this setback. I'm also sorry that the problems at WP:CP were not dealt with as swiftly as they should have been. We have a real shortage of admins working in that area. :(

If you have any questions about any of this, please feel welcome to come by my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)